DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of CHAMP Magnetic Anomalies for Polar Geodynamic Variations

  • Kim Hyung Rae (Goddard Earth Science and Technology, Univ. Maryland, Baltimore County at Geodynamics) ;
  • von Frese Ralph R.B. (Department of Geological Sciences, the Ohio State University) ;
  • Park Chan-Hong (Marine Geoenvironment & Resources Division, Korea Ocean Research and Development Inst.,) ;
  • Kim Jeong Woo (Dept. of Geoinformation Engineering, Sejong University)
  • Published : 2005.02.01

Abstract

On board satellite magnetometer measures all possible magnetic components, such as the core and crustal components from the inner Earth, and magnetospheric, ionospheric and' its coupled components from the outer Earth. Due to its dipole and non-dipole features, separation of the respective component from the measurements is most difficult unless the comprehensive knowledge of each field characteristics and the consequent modeling methods are solidly constructed. Especially, regional long wavelength magnetic signals of the crust are strongly masked by the main field and dynamic external field and hence difficult to isolate in the satellite measurements. In particular, the un-modeled effects of the strong auroral external fields and the complicated behavior of the core field near the geomagnetic poles conspire to greatly reduce the crustal magnetic signal-to-noise ratio in the polar region relative to the rest of the Earth. We can, however, use spectral correlation theory to filter the static lithospheric and core field components from the dynamic external field effects that are closely related to the geomagnetic storms affecting ionospheric current disturbances. To help isolate regional lithospheric anomalies from core field components, the correlations between CHAMP magnetic anomalies and the pseudo-magnetic effects inferred from satellite gravity-derived crustal thickness variations can also be exploited, Isolation of long wavelengths resulted from the respective source is the key to understand and improve the models of the external magnetic components as well as of the lower crustal structures. We expect to model the external field variations that might also be affected by a sudden upheaval like tsunami by using our algorithm after isolating any internal field components.

Keywords

References

  1. Alsdorf, D. E., R. R. B. von Frese, J. Arkani-hamed, and H. C. Noltimier, 1994. Separation of lithospheric, external, and core components of the south polar geomagnetic field at satellite altitudes, J. Geophys. Res., 99: 4655-4667 https://doi.org/10.1029/93JB02580
  2. Chao, B. and R. Gross, 2005. Did the 26 December 2004 Sumatra, Indonesia, Earthquake disrupt the Earth's rotation as the mass media have said?, Eos, 86: 1-2
  3. Constable, S and C. Constable, 2004. Observing geomagnetic induction in magnetic satellite measurements and associated implications for mantle conductivity, Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 5, Issue 1, Q01006
  4. Danziel, I. W. D. and D. H. Elliot, 1982. West Antarctica: Problem child of Gondwanaland, Tectonics, 1: 3-19 https://doi.org/10.1029/TC001i001p00003
  5. Fullerton, L. G., H. V. Frey, J. H. Roark, and H. H. Thomas, 1994. Contributions of Cretaceous Quiet Zone natural remanent magnetization to Magsat anomalies in the Southwest Indian Ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 99: 11923-11936 https://doi.org/10.1029/94JB00645
  6. Haines, G. V., 1985. Spherical cap harmonic analysis, J. Geophys. Res., 90: 2583-2591 https://doi.org/10.1029/JB090iB03p02583
  7. Kim, H. R., 2002. Antarctic lithospheric anomalies from Orsted satellite and near-surface magnetic observations (unpublish.), Ph. D. thesis, The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, Ohio
  8. Kim, H. R., R. R. B. von Frese, J. W. Kim, P. T. Taylor, and T. Neubert, 2002. $\phi$rsted verifies regional magnetic anomalies of the Antarctic lithosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett, 29: 8002-8005 https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013662
  9. LeBrecque, J. L. and C. A. Raymond, 1982. Seafloor spreading anomalies in the Magsat field of the North Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res., 9: 250-253
  10. Maus, S., M. Rother, K. Hemant, H. Luehr, A. Kuvshinov and N. Olsen, 2004. Earth's crustal magnetic field determined to spherical harmonic degree 90 from CHAMP satellite measurements, submitted to J. Geophys. Res
  11. Mayhew, M. A., B. D. Johnson, and P. J. Wasilewski, 1985. A review of problems and progress in studies of satellite magnetic anomalies, J. Geophys. Res., 90: 2511-2542 https://doi.org/10.1029/JB090iB03p02511
  12. Olsen, N., T. Sabaka, and L. Toffner-Clausen, 2000. Determination of the IGRF 2000, Earth, Planets and Space, 52: 1175-1182 https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352349
  13. Purucker, M. E., R. R. B. von Frese, and P. T. Taylor, 1999. Mapping and interpretation of satellite magnetic anomalies from POGO data over Antarctic region, Annali di Geofisica, 42: 215- 228
  14. Sabaka, T. J., N. Olsen, and R. A. Langel, 2002. A comprehensive model of the quiet-time, near- Earth magnetic field: phase 3, Geophys. J. Int., 151: 32-68 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01774.x
  15. von Frese, R. R. B., W. J. Hinze, and L. W. Braile, 1982. Regional North American gravity and magnetic anomaly correlations, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 69: 745-761 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1982.tb02773.x
  16. von Frese, R. R. B, M. B. Jones, J. W. Kim, and J. H. Kim, 1997. Analysis of anomaly correlations, Geophysics, 62: 342-351 https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444136
  17. von Frese, R. R. B, H. R. Kim, L. Tan, J. W. Kim, P. T. Taylor, M. E. Purucker, D. E. Alsdorf, and A. J. Anderson, 1999. Satellite magnetic anomalies of the Antarctic crust, Annali di Geofisica, 42: 293-307
  18. von Frese, R. R. B., L. Tan, J. W. Kim, and C. R. Bentley, 1999. Antarctic crustal modeling from the spectral correlation of free-air gravity anomalies with the terrain, J. Geophys. Res., 104: 25275-25297 https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JB900232
  19. von Frese, R. R. B. and H. R. Kim, 2003. Satellite magnetic anomalies for lithospheric exploration, Proceedings of OIST-4, 115-118