DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Emergy evaluation of the optimum number of stories of new apartment buildings

아파트의 적정 건설층수 결정을 위한 에머지(emergy)평가

  • Im Jung-Hyuk (Department of Envrionmental Engineering, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Kang Dae-Seok (Department of Ecological Engineering, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Lee Suk-Mo (Department of Ecological Engineering, Pukyong National University)
  • Published : 2005.05.01

Abstract

The cost of the construction and management of new apartment buildings was evaluated using a monetary analysis and an emergy concept to provide a new perspective regarding the housing policy of Korea. The systems of analyses were typical apartment buildings with an area of $76.03m^2$ per household in Korea built on the same size of land area. Three apartment buildings with different stories were evaluated and compared; 5-story, 15-story, and 20-story apartment buildings. The durable years of those apartments were assumed to be 40 years. The total cost of the construction and management of an apartment building was divided into three categories of construction, land purchase, and management. A 20-story apartment showed the highest cost and a 15-story apartment the lowest in the monetary cost analysis. In contrast, the emergy evaluation revealed a different pattern in the cost of construction and management, the cost increasing from a 5-story apartment to a 20-story one. This means that the higher the apartment constructed, the greater the cost in terms of real wealth. This result suggests that new evaluation methodologies like the emergy analysis should be used together with the monetary analysis to provide better insights on the national housing policy.

Keywords

References

  1. 대한주택공사, 2002, 주택핸드북, 493pp
  2. 통계청, 2000, 통계지리정보시스템 (http://gis.nso.go.kr)
  3. 김진균, 오정은, 2000, 중층고밀 집합주거의 적용 타당성 연구, 대한건축학회논문집(계획계), 16, 45-52
  4. 이상경, 배정환, 신영철, 2001, 서울시 용적률 규제강화에 따른 도시 및 주거환경 개선 편익 추정, 대한국토.도시계획학회지 '국토계획, 36(5), 89-99
  5. 이홍석, 이관호, 이언구, 2001, 환경비용과 생애 주기를 고려한 건물에너지의 경제성 분석방법에 관한 연구, 대한건축학회논문집(계획계), 21, 585-588
  6. 이유섭, 2003, 코스트 중요항목 분석을 통한 공사비 예측모델 연구, 한국건설관리학회논문집, 4(4), 212-219
  7. 정용식, 서치호, 2002, 고층공동주택 재건축과 리모델링의 경제성 비교를 위한 LCC분석연구, 대한건축학회논문집(구조계), 18(12), 115-124
  8. 심재만, 이동배, 2004, 고층아파트단지의 경관 구성요소와 차폐도 지표 설정에 관한 연구, 대한건축학회 논문집 (계획계), 20(2), 143-152
  9. 한수진, 박신영, 2003, 아파트 관리비의 영향 요인에 대한 실증 분석, 대한건축학회논문집(계획계), 19(4), 41-48
  10. Odum, H. T., 1996, Environmental Accounting, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 370pp
  11. Edward, L. and R. Trobjorn, 2003, Emergy evaluation of three cropping systems in south western Australia, Jornal of Ecological Modelling, 161, 195-211 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00341-1
  12. Lee, S. M. and H. T. Odum, 1994, Emergy analysis overview of Korea, J. of the Korean Environmental Sciences Society, 3(2), 165-175
  13. 손지호, 신성교, 조은일, 이석모, 1996, 한국 수산업의 EMERGY 분석, 한국수산학회지, 29(5), 689-700
  14. 이석모, 손지호, 강대석, 2000, 시스템 생태학적 접근법에 의한 한국의 지속적인 발전가능성 평가(I), 한국환경과학회지, 9(6), 449-454
  15. 엄기혁, 손지호, 조은일, 이석모, 박청길, 1996, EMERGY분석법에 의한 득량만의 환경용량 산정, 한국수산학회지, 29(5), 629-636
  16. 손지호, 이석모, 2000, Emergy 평가에 의한 부산광역시의 지속적인 발전가능성 평가, 한국환경과학회지, 9(3), 185-191
  17. 김진이, 손지호, 김영진, 이석모, 2000, 낙동강 유역의 지속가능한 이용을 위한 EMERGY 분석, 한국환경과학회지, 9(1), 49-55
  18. Kang, D. S and S. S. Park. 2002, Emergy evaluation perspectives of a multipurpose dam proposal in Korea, J. of Environmental Management, 66, 293-306 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4797(02)90594-3
  19. Huang, S. L. and W. L. Hsu, 2003, Material flow analysis and emergy evaluation of Taipei's urban construction, J. of Landscape and Urban Planning, 63, 61-74 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00152-4
  20. Brown, M. T. and S. Ulgiati, 2002, Emergy evaluations and environmental loacling of electricity production systems, Journal of Cleaner Production, 10, 321-334 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00043-9
  21. 대한주택공사, 2002, 주택공사비분석자료 (http://itis.jugong.co.kr/)
  22. 대한가정생활진흥회, 2000, '투명한 아파트 길라잡이 2000' 프로그램
  23. 한국감정평가협회, 2000, 표준공시지가 수준표(http://kapanet.co.kr/)

Cited by

  1. A Study on the Estimation of Environmental Carrying Capacity and Sustainability in National Land using the Emergy Synthesis vol.25, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2016.25.2.141