Economic Valuation of an Urban Green Space Using Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice CVM

이단계 이선 가상가치평가법을 사용한 도시녹지의 경제적 가치평가

  • Hong, Sung-Kwon (Department of Environmental Science, Konkuk University) ;
  • Kim, Jae-Hyun (Department of Environmental Science, Konkuk University) ;
  • Jo, Hyun-Kil (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Kangwon National University)
  • Published : 2005.02.01


본 연구는 서울시 도시녹지를 1평을 늘리는 것에 대한 시민들의 지불의사금액(WTP)을 이단계 이선 가상가치법으로 계산함으로써 도시녹지의 경제적 가치를 평가하고, WTP에 영향을 미치는 변수들의 종류와 영향력 정도를 밝히기 위해 수행되었다. 지불도구는 기금이었으며, 'fat-tail problem'없이 WTP를 계산하기 위해 생존분석을 사용하였다. 분석 결과, 서울시민들은 생활녹지 1평을 늘리는데 약 23,400원을 기부할 용의가 있었다. WTP에 영향을 주는 변수는 자연환경태도(NEP), 구조적 제한요소, 소득 및 환경보전을 위해 편리함을 양보할 의사이었다. 본 연구의 결과는 도시녹지의 개발 또는 보존과 관련된 정부의 의사결정이나 도시녹지 관련 예산 확충을 요구할 수 있는 기본 자료로 활용할 수 있을 것이다.


  1. Alberini, A.(1995a) Testing willingness-to-pay models of discrete choice contingent valuation survey data. Land Eco-nomics 71: 83-95
  2. Alberini, A.(1995b) Optimal designs for discrete choice con-tingent valuation surveys: Single-bound. double-bound. and bivahate. Journal of Environmental Economics and Manage-ment 28: 287-306
  3. Bishop. R. C., and T. A. Herberlein (1979) Measuhng values of extramarket goods: Are indirect measures biased? American Journal of Agricultural Economics 61: 926-930
  4. Bockstael. N. E., K. E. McConnell. and I. E. Strand (1991) Recreation. In: J. B. Braden. and C. D. Kolstad. eds. Measuhng the Demand for Environmental Quality. Ams-terdam: North-Holland. pp. 227-270
  5. Botha, C., J. L. Crompton. and S. Kim (1999) developing a revised competitive position for Sun/Lost City. South Africa. Journal of Travel Research 37: 341-352
  6. Brown. T.. P. ChamP, R. Bishop, and D. McCollum (1996) Which response format reveals the truth about donations to a public goods? Land Economics 72: 152-166
  7. Cameron, T. A., and D. D. Huppert(1991) Referendum contingent valuation estimation: Sensitivity to the assign-ment of offered values. Journal of the American Statistical Association 86: 910-918
  8. Cameron, T. A., and J. Quiggin (1994) Estimation using contingent valuation data from a "dichotomous choice with follow-up" questionnaire. Journal Environmental Economics
  9. Carson, R., and R. C. Mitchell(1987) Economic Value of Reliable Water Supplies for Residential Water Users in the State Water Project Service Area. Report Prepared for the Metropolitan Water district of Southem California
  10. Carson, R., and D. Steinberg(1989) Estimation of Demand Curves via Survival Analysis. Paper Presented at the Annual Amehcan Statistical Association Winter Conference, january, San Diego. CA
  11. Choi. Yoon-jeong(2001) A Study on the Valuation of View in Apartment Housing Price. Master's Thesis. University of Seoul
  12. Chung. S. -S., and C.-S. Poon(2001) A comparison of waste-reduction practice and new environmental paradigm of rural and urban Chinese citizens. Journal of Environ-mental Management 62: 3-19
  13. Cooper. J., and J. Loomis (1992) Sensitivity of willingness-to-pay estimates to bid design in dichotomous choice contingent valuation method. Land Economics 68: 211-224
  14. Crawford. D. W., and G. Godbey (1987) Reconceptualizing barriers to farmly leisure. Leisure Sciences 9: 119-127
  15. Dharmaratne, G. S., and A. E. Brathwaite (1998) Economic valuation of the coastline for tourism in Barbados. Journal of Travel Research 37: 138-144
  16. Dunlap. R., and K. Van Liere (1978) The new environ-mental paradigm. Journal of Environmental Education 9:10-19
  17. Dwyer, J. F., E. G. McPherson, H. W. Schroeder. and R. A. Rowntree (1992) Assessing the benefits and costs of the urban forest. Journal of Arboriculture 18: 227-234
  18. Dwyer, J. F., G. L. Peterson, and A. J. Danrragh (1983) Estimating the value of urban forests using the travel cost method. Joumal of Arboriculture 9: 182-185
  19. Fishbein. M., and I. Ajzen (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading: Addison-Wesley
  20. Hair, J., R. Anderson, R. Tatham, and W. Black (1995) Multivariate Data Analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall
  21. Hanemann, W. M.(1984) Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. Amehcan Journal of Agricultural Economics 66: 332-341.
  22. Hanemann, W. M.(1985) Some issues in continuous- and discrete-response contingent valuation studies. Northeastern Journal of Agricultural Economics 5-13
  23. Hanemann. W. M.(1989) Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete response data: Reply. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71: 1057-1061
  24. Hanemann, M., J. Loomis, and B. Kannmen (1991) Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Amehcan Journal of Agricultural Economics 73: 1254-1263
  25. Henderson, K. A., D. Stalnaker, and G. Taylor (1988) The relationship between barriers to recreation and gender-role personality traits for women. Journal of Leisure Research 20: 69-80
  26. Herriges, J. A., and J. F. Shogren (1996) Starting point bias in dichotomous choice valuation with follow-up questioning. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 31:112-131
  27. Hong, Sung-kwon (1998) Economic valuation of Yeido Park: Application of double-Bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation method. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 26: 90-103
  28. Jackson. E. L.(1990) Variations in the desire to begin a leisure activity: Evidence of antecedent constraints? Journal of Leisure Research 22: 55-70
  29. Jackson. E. L., and K. A. Henderson (1995) Gender based analysis of leisure constraints. Leisure Sciences 17: 31-51
  30. Jackson. E. L., D. W. Crawford, and G. Godbey (1993) Negotiation of leisure constraints. Leisure Sciences 15: 1-11
  31. Kanninen. B. J.(1995) Bias in discrete response contingent valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Ma nagement 28: 114-125
  32. Kleinbaum, D. G.(1996) Survival Analysis: A Delf-Learning Text. New York: Sphnger-Verlag
  33. Korea Forest Service(2002) Masterplan to Establish and Manage Urban Forest
  34. Korea National Statistical Office(2000) Population. House-holds and Housing Units by Administrative Disthct
  35. Lockwood. M., and K. Tracy(1995) Nonmarket economic valuation of an urban recreation park. Joumal of Leisure Research 27: 155-167
  36. Loomis. J. B.(1988) Contingent valuation using dichotomous choice models. Journal of Leisure Research 20: 46-56
  37. McPherson. E. G.(1992) Accounting for benefits and costs of urban green space. Landscape and Urban Planning 22:41-51
  38. Miller. R. W.(1997) Urban Forestry: Planning and Ma-naging Urban green spaces. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall
  39. Mitchell, R. C., and R. T. Carson(1993) Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future
  40. Morales, D. J., F. R. Micha. and R. L. Weber(1983) Two methods of valuating trees on residential sites, journal of Arbohculture 9: 21-24
  41. More, T. A., T. Stevens, and P. G, Allen(1988) Valuation of urban parks. Landscape and Planning 15: 139-152
  42. Nunnally. J., and I. Bernstein(1994) Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill
  43. Schneider. F., and W. Pommerehne(1981) Free riding and collective action: An experiment in public microeconomics. Quarterly Journal of Economics 97: 689-702
  44. Seoul Development Institute (2001) Urban Master Planning for 2021 Seoul: Park and green space Planning
  45. Seoul Metropolitan Government(2002) Vision Seoul 2006
  46. Shin, W., R. Jaakson. and E. Kim(2001) Environmental auditing: Benefit-based analysis of visitor use of Sorak-San national park in Korea. Environmental Management 28:413-419
  47. Stevens, T., J. Echeverrmia. R. Glass, T. Hager, and T. More(1991) Measuring the existence value of wldlife:What do cvm estimates really show? Land Economics 67:390-400
  48. Tyrvinen. L., and H. Vaananen(1998) The economic value of urban forest amenities: An application of the contingent valuation method. Landscape and Urban Planning 43:105-118
  49. Ulrich, R. S.(1984) View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science 224: 420-421
  50. Ulrich, R. S.(1986) Human responses to vegetation and landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 13: 29-44
  51. U.S. District Court of Appeals(1989) State of Ohio versus US Department of Interior. Case No.86-1575. July 14. 1989
  52. U.S. Water Resources Council(1983) Economic and Environ-mental Principles for Water and Related Land Resources Implementation Studies, Washington. D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office
  53. 6600