Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association (대한가정학회지)

The Korean Home Economics Association (대한가정학회)
권호 표지

The effect of Project Approach Program on Children's Cognitive Styles

프로젝트접근법이 유아의 인지양식에 미치는 영향

  • 채행찬 (상명대학교 가족복지학과) ;
  • 황혜신 (상명대학교 가족복지학과)
  • Published : 2005.04.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The present study investigation the effect of a project approach program on children's cognitive styles. It examined closely the characteristics and processes of the project approach program to determine its impact on children's individual cognitive styles such as divergent thinking, field independence, and reflection. The subjects were 384-year-old children. Eighteen children were assigned to the experimental group and twenty to the control group. Pretest-treatment-posttest design was adopted for this study. Collected data were analyzed with SPSS Win 10.0 and processed statistically using average, standard deviation, and ANCOVA. For the children's divergent thinking, the children with the project approach program showed significant difference in fluency and flexibility, but no difference in originality and elaboration, compared to the children in the control group. Children with the project approach program showed more field independence than those in the control group. Children with the project approach program showed no difference in reflection. These results showed that the project approach pro!3ram partly influenced the children's cognitive styles.

Keywords

References

  1. 김미숙(1985). 5세 아동의 사려성-충동성 인지양식과 창의성 관계에 관한 연구. 중앙대학교 석사학위논문
  2. 김미숙(1985). 5세 아동의 장독립성-장의존성 인지 양식과 창의성과의 관계에 관한 연구. 중앙대 학교석사학위 논문
  3. 김미정(1987). 5-6세 유아의 인지양식과 창의성간의 관계: 장독립성 장의존성 차원을 중심으로. 이화여자대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문
  4. 김유미(1995). 유아의 장독립성-의존성 인지양식과 조망수용능력과의 관계. 이화여자대학교 석사 학위논문
  5. 심옥화(1997). 창의성 교육 프로그램 개발과 효과에 관한 연구. 이화여자대학교 석사학위논문
  6. 전윤식.장혁표(1986). 집단잠입도형검사. 코리안 테스팅 센터
  7. 채순희.이기현(2002). 프로젝트접근법이 유아의 과학적 문제해결력에 미치는 영향. 아동학회지, 23(6), 103-119
  8. 최송림(1999). 프로젝트 접근법이 아동의 사회 정서 발달과 창의성발달에 미치는 영향. 전북대학 교석사학위논문
  9. Alieldin, M. T(1979). Torrance Indicators of Creative Thinking: A developmental Study. Dissertation Abstracts International, 39, 4129
  10. Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and Grouwth in Personality. NY : Holt, Rinehart and Winston
  11. Berry, J. W. (1976). Human ecology and cognitive style: Comparative studies in cultural and psychological adaptation. New Work: Wiley
  12. Coates, S. W. (1974). Sex-differences field dependenceindependence between the age of 3 and 6. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 39, 1307-1310 https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1974.39.3.1307
  13. Gandini, L., & Edwards, P. E. (1988). Early childhood integration of the visual arts. Gifted International, 5(3), 14-18
  14. Gardner, R W., Holzman, P.S., Klein, G. S., Linton, H. B., & Spence, D. P. (1959). Cognitive control: A study of individual encies in cognitive behavior. Psychological Issue, 1(4), 1- 186
  15. Goldstein, K. M., & Blackman, B. (1978). Cognitive Style-Five approaches and relevant research. NY: John Wiley & Sons
  16. Goodenough, O. R, & Eagle, C. A. (1963). Modification of the Embedded Figures Test for use with young children. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 103, 67-74 https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1963.10532498
  17. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill
  18. Guilford, J. P. (1980). Cognitive style: What are they? Education and Psychological Measurement, 4(3), 715-735
  19. Harrison, A, & Nadelman, L. (1972). Conceptual Tempo and Inhibition of movement in Black Preschool Children. Child Development, 43, 657- 668 https://doi.org/10.2307/1127564
  20. Justice, M. T. (1969), Field dependence, intimacy of topic and interperson distance(Ooctoral dissertation, University of Florida). Dissertation Abstracts International, 31, 395B-396B
  21. Kagan, J. (1966). Reflectionceptual tempo. Journal of Abnarmal Psychology, 71, 17-24 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022886
  22. Kagan, J., & Kogan, N. (1970). Individual variations in cognitive psychology, In NY: Wiley. L. G., & Chard, S. C. (1989). Engaging children's minds. NY: Ablex
  23. Kilpatrick, W. H. (1919). The Project method. NY: Teachers College, Columbia University
  24. Klein, G. S. (1961). The personal world through perception. In P. R Blake and G. W. Ramsey (Eds.), Perception: An Approach to Personality (pp. 1-50). NY; Ronald
  25. Messer, S. B., & Brodzinsky, D. M. (1979). The relation of conceptual tempo to aggression and its controL Child Development, 50, 758-766 https://doi.org/10.2307/1128943
  26. New, R S. (1992). The integrated early childhood curriculum: New interpretations based on research and practice. In C. Columbia University, NY: Teachers College Press
  27. New, R S. (1993). Reggio Emilia: Some lessons for U.S. educators. ERIC Diagest. (BOD PS-93-3)
  28. New, R S. (1994). Reggio Emilia: Its vision and challenges for educators in the United States. In L. G. Katz, & B. Cesarone (Eds.), Reflections on the Reggio Emilia Approach(33-40). Perspectives from ERIC/EECE [monograph serical No. 6].
  29. Peters. S. (1990). Project work report. Unpublished manuscript
  30. Siegel, A. W., Kirasic, K. CI, & Kilburg, P. R (1973). Recognition memory in reflective and impulsive preschool children. Child Development, 44, 651-656 https://doi.org/10.2307/1128025
  31. Steinfeld, S. L. (1973), Level of differentiation and age as predictor of reinforcer effectiveness. Doctoral dissertation, HofstraUniversity
  32. Torrance, E. P. (1959). Research notes from here and there: Current Research on the nature of creative talent. Journal of Counseling psychology, 6(4),309-316 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042285
  33. Werner, E. E. (1979), Cross-culture child development, Monterey, California: Brooks/Cole
  34. Witkin, H. A., Faterson, H. F., Goodenough, D. R, & Karp, S. A. (1962). Psychological differentiation. New York: John Wiley & Sons
  35. Witkin, H. A., Goodenough, D. R (1977), Field dependence and interpersonal behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 661-689 https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.84.4.661