Comparative Study on Somatotype Characteristic based on Sasang Physical Constitution and Body Measurement Method for Women in their 20's

사상체질(四象體質)에 근거(根據)한 체질별(體質別) 체형특성(體型特性)과 인체계측(人體計測)을 통(通)한 유형별(類型別) 체형특성(體型特性)과의 비교연구(比較硏究)- 20대(代) 성인여성(成人女性)을 중심(中心)으로 -

  • Shim, Boo-Ja (Dept. of Fashion & Textiles, Dong-A University) ;
  • Suh, Chu-Yeon (Dept. of Fashion & Textiles, Dong-A University) ;
  • Lee, So-Young (Dept. of Fashion & Textiles, Dong-A University)
  • 심부자 (동아대학교 의상섬유학부) ;
  • 서추연 (동아대학교 의상섬유학부) ;
  • 이소영 (동아대학교 의상섬유학부)
  • Published : 2004.06.30

Abstract

This study aims to compare and analyze somatotype characteristics in clothing ergonomics as well as Sasang (Oriental physical constitution type classification into 4 kinds: taeyang, taeeum, soyang, soeum) medicine. The subjects were women collegians in their 20s. As a result, a new approach was made in somatotype classification. The following are conclusions: 1. The results of body measurement of the subjects belonged to 1 in most items when they were compared with the average records of female adults in their 20s in the national standard physique report. Thus, the subjects belonged to the average somatotype. 2. According to Sasang physical constitution classification, no subjects belonged to taeyang-type. Taeeum type (28.4%), had lower-body development greatest height and even development in width, thickness and girth. Soeum-type(37.8%) had the smallest physique. Soyang-type(33.8%) showed small values in height but great values in width, thickness and girth. 3. The factor analysis revealed 5 factors of somatotype characteristics: lower body factors including body weight, upper body factors, height factors including stature, belly width factors including waist and belly, and other factors comprising ankle and head size. 4. A cluster analysis by way of factor scores resulted in 3 types: cluster 1 44.6%, biggest values, largest somatotypes; cluster 2 17.6%, average somatotypes; cluster 3 tiniest somatotypes in most items. 5. In the crosstabs analysis, taeeum-type (57.6%) appeared a lot in cluster 1, soyang-type (76.9%) appeared most in cluster 2, and soeum-type (69.9%) was mostly seen in cluster 3. To sum up, the somatotype analysis of clothing ergonomics had something to do with constitution classification suggested in Sasang medicine. For clear justification, more systematic and scientific research should be followed with even more diverse subjects in sex and age.

Keywords

References

  1. 김수범(2000), 내 몸에 꼭 맞는 체질건강법, 동아시아출판사
  2. 김혜경(1997), 피복인간공학 실험실계방법론, 교문사
  3. 대한 사상의학회(1970), www.esasasang.com
  4. 대한 사상체질연구회(2001), www.sinbihan.co.kr
  5. 산업자원부 기술 표준원(1997), KS A-7003
  6. 산업자원부 기술 표준원(1999), KS A-7004
  7. 산업자원부 기술 표준원(1997), 국민표준체위조사
  8. 손병욱(1997), 사상의학의 이해(상․하), 행림출판사
  9. 송일병(1993), 알기 쉬운 사상의학, 하나미디어
  10. 심부자(1997), 피복인간공학, 교문사
  11. 심재평(1999), 사상의학의 사상체질과 동, 서양의 체질유형론 비교연구, 성균관대 교육대학원 석사학위 논문
  12. 이문호(1988), 사상체질유형과 체격 및 신체형태지수와의 비교연구, 원광대 한의학과 석사논문
  13. 이정임,남윤자(2002), 18-24세 한국인 여성의 표준체형에 관한 연구(제1보)-다빈도유형 및 다빈도구간에 대한 분석을 중심으로, 한국의류학회지, 26(5), 630-641
  14. 이정임,남윤자(2002), 18-24세 한국인 여성의 표준체형에 관한 연구(제2보)-표준프로포션과 표준체형에 대하여, 한국의류학회지, 26(6), 801-810
  15. 정명숙(1994), 성인 여성 체형의 분류 및 연령별 특징연구, 서울대학 대학원 박사 학위논문
  16. 최유경․이순원(1998), 성인 여성의 정면 체형에 대한 형태적 분류, 한국의류학회지, 22(1), 80-88