KOREAN JOURNAL OF CROP SCIENCE (한국작물학회지)

The Korean Society of Crop Science (한국작물학회)
권호 표지

Comparison of Two Soybean Cultivars in Dry Matter Production and Ecophysiological Characteristics

  • Cho Jin-Woong (Honam Agricultrual Research Institute, National Institute of Crop Science) ;
  • Lee Jung-Joon (Honam Agricultrual Research Institute, National Institute of Crop Science) ;
  • Kim Choong-Soo (Collage of Agriculture & Life Science, Chungnam National University)
  • Published : 2004.09.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This experiment was carried out at paddy field (commercial silty loam soil) in the southwestern Korea. Pungsannamulkong, a determinate growth habit, was a relatively high yielding and late maturing cultivar, and Han­namkong, a semi determinate growth habit, was a relatively low yielding and early maturing cultivar. Seeds were sowed at two plants and with a planting density of $70{\times}10cm$ on May 26, 2003. Fertilizer was applied prior to planting at a rate of 3.0-3.0-3.4g $(N-P_2O_5-K_2O)\;per\;m^2$ by all basal fertilizations. Experimental design was a randomized complete block with three replications. Seed yield was higher in Pungsannamulkong by 362g per $m^2$ than in Hannamkong of 260g per $m^2$ Also, the number of pod, number of seed, and number of seed per pod were greater in Pungsannamulkong than in Hannamkong. The number of leaves per $m^2$ showed similar with two soybean cultivars up to August 24 but thereafter it decreased in Hannamkong. The leaf area up to August 4 increased in Hannamkong higher than in Pungsannamulkong, but after that time, Pungsannamulkong had greater leaf area than Hannamkong. The shoot and leaf dry matter of two soybean cultivars from June 23 to August 4 were similar but thereafter, Pungsannamulkong had a significantly greater than Hannamkong. Crop growth rate (CGR), relative growth rate (RGR) and net assimilate rate (NAR) for Punsannamulkong were relatively higher than Hannamkong but leaf area ratio (LAR) and specific leaf weight (SLW) showed higher in Hannamkong. Most of leaves distributed in the ranges of 80-90cm and 60-70cm from the soil surface in Punsannamulkong and Hannamkong, respectively. Pods of Punsannamulkong ranged 10-80cm from the soil surface and most of pods were distributed at 40-50cm. Photosynthetic rate at the flowering stage showed a significant difference between cultivars in the upper most leaf position. There was no significant difference of the photosynthetic rate at $7^{tn}$ leaf at the flowering stage, and the uppermost and 7th leaf position at the seed development stage between two soybean cultivars.

Keywords

References

  1. Asanome, N and T. Ikeda 1998 Effect of branch directions arrangement on soybean yield and yield components. J Agronomy & Crop Sci 181 .95-102 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.1998.tb00404.x
  2. Buttery, B. R. and R I. Buzzell 1977 The relationship between chlorophyll content and rate of photosynthesis In soybean. Ca J Plant Sci 57. 1-5 https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps77-001
  3. Cho, J. W, C. H KIm, and J D So. 2003 Varietal difference of dry matter production and photosynthesis of middle and lower leaves in soybean Korean J Crop Sci 48: 25-30
  4. Domhoff, G. M. and R. M. Shibles 1970. Varietal differences in net photosynthesis of soybean leaves Crop Sci 10 43-45
  5. Fehr, W R, C E Caviness, D T Burmood, and J S Pennington 1971 Stage of development descriptions for soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merrill Crop Sci. 11 . 929-931 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1971.0011183X001100060051x
  6. Ford, D M., R Shibles, and D E. Green. 1983. Growth and yield of soybean lines selected pod divergent leaf photosynthetic ability Crop Sci.23 . 517-520 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1983.0011183X002300030018x
  7. Hunt, R 1982 Plant growth curves An introduction to the functional approach to plant growth analysis Edward Arnold, London, pp 14-46
  8. Ikeda, T 2000. Some factors related with net production of soybean population. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 69.12-19 https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.69.12
  9. Kokubun, M., H. Mochida, and Y. Asahi. 1988 Soybean cultivars difference in leaf photosynthetic rate and its relation to seed yield. Jpn J. Crop Sci. 57 743-748 https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.57.743
  10. Kokubun, M and K Watanabe 1982 Analysis of the yield determining process of field grown soybean in relation to canopy structure Japan J Crop Sci 51 51-57 https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.51.51
  11. Ookawa, T, Y Takase, K Ishihara, and T Hirasawa 1999 Dry matter production and ecophysiological characteristics between soybean cultivars, Enrei and Tachinagaha Jpn. J Crop Sci 68: 105-111 https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.68.105
  12. Sagawa, S 1998 Varietal difference in photosynthetic rate of middle and lower leaves and its relation to seed yield In soybean plants. Jpn J Crop Sci 67. 221-225 https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.67.221
  13. Shin, D. C ,C K Park, I Y Baek, I Y.jung, S. B Song, H S Suh, and Y. J. Oh. 1995. Early maturing, resistant to disease and logging, small seed size sprouting soybean variety 'Hannamkong' RDA J Agri Sci 37.139-143
  14. Suh, S. K ,H S Kim, Y J Oh, K H Kim, S K Cho, Y J Kim, S D Kim, H. K Park, M S Park, and S Y. Cho 1997 A new soybean variety for sprout with small seed high yielding 'Pungsan namulkong'. RDA J Sci 39 120-124
  15. Wofford, T J and F L. Allen 1982 Variation in leaflet orientation among soybean cultivars. Crop Sci 22 999-1004 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1982.0011183X002200050025x