Monitoring of Bacterial Community in a Coniferous Forest Soil After a Wildfire

  • Kim Ok-Sun (Department of Environmental Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Yoo Jae-Jun (Department of Environmental Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Lee Dong-Hun (Division of Life Sciences, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Ahn Tae-Seok (Department of Environmental Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Song Hong-Gyu (Division of Biological Sciences, Kangwon National University)
  • Published : 2004.12.01

Abstract

Changes in the soil bacterial community of a coniferous forest were analyzed to assess microbial responses to wildfire. Soil samples were collected from three different depths in lightly and severely burned areas, as well as a nearby unburned control area. Direct bacterial counts ranged from $3.3­22.6\times10^8\;cells/(g{\cdot}soil).$ In surface soil, direct bacterial counts of unburned soil exhibited a great degree of fluctuation. Those in lightly burned soil changed less, but no significant variation was observed in the severely burned soil. The fluctuations of direct bacterial count were less in the middle and deep soil lay­ers. The structure of the bacterial community was analyzed via the fluorescent in situ hybridization method. The number of bacteria detected with the eubacteria-targeted probe out of the direct bacterial count varied from $30.3\;to\;84.7\%,$ and these ratios were generally higher in the burned soils than in the unburned control soils. In the surface unburned soil, the ratios of $\alpha,\;\beta\;and\;gamma-proteobacteria,$ Cytoph­aga-Flavobacterium group, and other eubacteria groups to total eubacteria were 9.9, 10.6, 15.5, 9.0, and $55.0\%,$ respectively, and these ratios were relatively stable. The ratios of $\alpha,\;\beta\;and\;gamma-proteobacteria,$ and Cytophaga-Flavobacterium group to total eubacteria increased immediately after the wildfire, and the other eubacterial proportions decreased in the surface and middle layer soils. By way of contrast, the composition of the 5 groups of eubacteria in the subsurface soil exhibited no significant fluctuations dur­ing the entire period. The total bacterial population and bacterial community structure disturbed by wildfire soon began to recover, and original levels seemed to be restored 3 months after the wildfire.

Keywords

References

  1. Acea, M. and T. Carballas. 1996. Changes in physiological groups of microorganisms in soil following wildfire. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 20, 33-39
  2. Acea, M., A. Prieto-Fernández, and N. Diz-Cid. 2003. Cyanobacterial inoculation of heated soils: effect on microorganisms of C and N cycles and on chemical composition in soil surface. Soil Biol. Biochem. 35, 513-524
  3. Ahn, T., J. Lee, D. Lee, and H. Song. 2002. Ecological monitoring of soil microbial community after forest fire, p. 144-175. In Proceedings of Symposium on Prevention of large forest fire and remediation of ecosystem. Korea Forest Research Institute, Seoul, Korea
  4. Alfreider, A., J. Pernthaler, R. Amann, B. Sattler, F. Glöckner, A. Wille, and R. Psenner. 1996. Community analysis of the bacterial assemblages in the winter cover and pelagic layers of a high mountain lake by in situ hybridization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62, 2138-2144
  5. Amann, R., W. Ludwig, and K. Schleifer. 1995. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol. Rev. 59, 143-169
  6. Baath, E., A. Frostegard, T. Pennanen, and H. Fritze. 1995. Microbial community structure and pH response in relation to soil organic matter quality in wood-ash fertilized, clear-cut or burned coniferous forest soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 27, 229-240
  7. Belkova, N.L., V.V. Dryukker, S.H. Hong, and T.S. Ahn. 2003. A study of the composition of the aquatic bacterial community of Lake Baikal by the in situ hybridization method. Microbiol. 72, 244-245
  8. Gabos, S., M. Ikonomou, D. Schopflocher, B. Fowler, J. White, E. Prepas, D. Prince, and W. Chen. 2001. Characteristics of PAHs, PCDD/Fs and PCBs in sediment following forest fires in Northern Alberta. Chemosphere. 43, 709-719
  9. Glockner, F.O., B.M. Fuchs, and R. Amann. 1999. Bacterioplankton compositions of lakes and oceans: a first comparison based on fluorescence in situ hybridization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 3721-3726
  10. Harris, P., H. Schomberg, P. Banks, and J. Giddens. 1995. Burning, tillage and herbicide effects on the soil microflora in a wheatsoybean double-crop system. Soil Biol. Biochem. 27, 153-156
  11. Hartmann, A., B. Aamus, G. Kirchhof, and M. Schloter. 1997. Direct approaches for studying soil microbes, p. 279-309. In J. van Elsas, J. Trevors, and E. Wellington (eds.) Modern Soil Microbiology, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York
  12. Hicks, R., R. A$\beta$mann, and D. Stahl. 1992. Dual staining of natural bacterioplankton with 4, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole and fluorescent oligonucleotide probes targeting kingdom level 16S rRNA sequences. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58, 2158-2163.
  13. Hobbie, J., R. Daley, and S. Japer. 1977. Use of Nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 33, 1225-1228
  14. Kim, J.-B. 2002. Molecular ecological analysis of the structural changes of bacterial community in forest soil stressed by fire. M.S. Thesis, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea
  15. Lund, V. and J. Goksøyr. 1980. Effects of water fluctuations on microbial mass and activity in soil. Microb. Ecol. 6, 115-123
  16. MacGregor, B. 1999. Molecular approaches to the study of aquatic microbial communities. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 10, 220-224
  17. Madigan, M., J. Martinko, and J. Parker. 2003. Brock Biology of Microorganisms, p. A5-A13. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
  18. Manz, W., R. Amann, W. Ludwig, and M. Wagner. 1992. Phylogentic oligodeoxynucleotide probes for the major subclasses of Proteobacteria: Problems and solutions. Syst. Appl. Micorbiol. 15, 593-600
  19. Martínez, M., J. Díaz-Ferrero, R. Martí, F. Broto-Puig, L. Comellas, and M. Rodríguez-Larena. 2000. Analysis of dioxin-like compounds in vegetation and soil samples burned in Catalan forest fire. Comparison with the corresponding unburned material. Chemosphere 41, 1927-1935
  20. Neary, D., C. Klopatek, L. DeBano, and P. Ffolliott. 1999. Fire effects on belowground sustainability: a review and synthesis. Forest Ecol. Manage. 122, 51-71
  21. Sharma, G.D. 1981. Effect of fire on soil microorganisms in a Meghalaya pine forest. Folia Microbiol. 26, 321-327
  22. Stevenson, I.L. 1956. Some observations on the microbial activity in remoistened air-dried soils. Plant and Soil 8, 171-182
  23. Swift, L., K. Elliott, R. Ottmar, and R. Vihnanek. 1993. Site preparation burning to improve Southern Appalachian pine-hardwood stands: fire characteristics and soil erosion, moisture, and temperature. Can. J. Forest Res. 23, 2242-2254
  24. Trebesius, K., R. Amann, W. Ludwig, K. Mühlegger, and K. Schleifer. 1994. Identification of whole fixed bacterial cells with nonradioactive rRNA targeted transcript probes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60, 3228-3235
  25. Vasander, H. and T. Lindholm. 1985. Fire intensities and surface temperatures during prescribed burning. Silva Fennica. 19, 1-15
  26. Vazquez, F., M. Acea, and T. Carballas. 1993. Soil microbial populations after wildfire. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 13, 93-104
  27. Wackett, L. and C. Hershberger. 2001. Biocatalysis and Biodegradation : Microbial transformation of organic compounds, p. 39-69. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
  28. Walstad, J., S. Radosevich, and D. Sandberg. 1990. Introduction to natural and prescribed fire in Pacific Northwest forests, p. 3-5. In J.D. Walstad, S.R. Radosevich, and D.V. Sandberg (eds.), Natural and Prescribed Fire in Pacific Northwest Forests Oregon State University Press, Corvallis.