한국의류학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles)

  • 제28권12호
  • /
  • Pages.1562-1570
  • /
  • 2004
  • /
  • 1225-1151(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-0793(eISSN)
한국의류학회 (The Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles)
권호 표지

물질주의 성향 및 사회화대행자의 태도가 의복의 상징적 소비에 미치는 영향

The Effect of Materialism and Agent of Socialization on the Symbolic Consumption in Clothing

  • 이선재 (숙명여자대학교 의류학과) ;
  • 고은경 (숙명여자대학교 의류학과)
  • Lee Sunjae (Dept. of Clothing and Textiles, Sookmyung Women's University) ;
  • Ko Eunkyung (Dept. of Clothing and Textiles, Sookmyung Women's University)
  • 발행 : 2004.12.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 제품의 기능적 측면보다는 제품이 지니고 있는 사회적, 주관적 의미를 더 중요하게 생각하는 소비지향적인 사회분위기 속에서, 이론적 연구와 예비조사결과를 토대로 물질주의 성향과 사회화대행자의 영향력에 따른 의복의 상징적 소비에 차이가 있는지를 알아보고자 하였다. 연구대상은 수도권에 거주하는 20대 여성 500명을 편의 추출하여 설문조사하였으며, 불성실한 응답을 제외한 426명을 SPSS통계 Package를 이용하여 요인분석, 신뢰도 검증, 분산분석, Duncan-test, 회귀분석 등을 실시하였다. 연구결과, 의복의 상징적 소비는 유행추구적 소비, 유명상표지향적 소비, 쾌락적 소비 요인으로 분류되었으며,20대 여성 소비자에게 의복은 기능적 측면으로서 뿐만 아니라 쾌락적 소비의 수단으로써 중요한 존재임을 알 수 있었다. 또한 물질주의 성향이 높을수록, 사회화대행자의 영향력을 많이 받을수록 의복의 상징적 소비와 하위요인의 성향도 높게 나타났다. 다중회귀분석 결과 의복의 상징적 소비에 영향을 미치는 가장 큰 요인은 준거집단의 영향이었으며, 물질주의성향과 대중매체의 영향도 큰 것으로 나타났다.

The main purpose of this study was to investigate the elements which influence the symbolic consumption in clothing. Materialism and agent of socialization have been studied and the affect of these two are also developed. The theoretical study and survey methods were used. The survey was administered to 426 women in their twenties living in Seoul and Kyungki region. SPSS packages were applied to find out the results of ANOVA Duncans multiple range tests, means, standard deviation, factor analysis, and regression analysis. The major findings of this study could be summerized as follows; First, the subordinate parts of symbolic consumption was divided into these three parts; fashion oriented consumption, brand oriented consumption, hedonic consumption. The average of hedonic consumption was higher than other subordinate parts of symbolic consumption. Second, symbolic consumption was seemed to have the differences according to materialism and its subfactors. The higher materialism indicated, the higher symbolic consumption was. Third, symbolic consumption was proven to have the differences according to agent of socialization such as reference group and mass media. The higher the influence of the reference group and mass media was, the higher symbolic consumption was. Fourth, according to the results of the regression analysis examing the relative influences of variables affecting symbolic consumption in clothing, the influence of the reference group was the most important variable. The influence of mass media and materialism was related positively to the symbolic consumption.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bearden, W. O. & Etzel, M. J. (1982). Reference group influ-ence on product and brand purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(September), 183-194
  2. Belk, R. W. (1984). Three scales measure constructs related to materialism: reliability, validity, and relationship to measures of happiness. Advances In Consumer Research, 11
  3. Brim, O. G. (1968). Socialization and society. ed. J. Clausen, Boston: Little, Brown & Co
  4. Buckley, H. M. & Roach, M. E. (1974). Clothing as a non-verbal communicator of social and political attitudes. Home Economics Research Journal, 3(December), 98-102
  5. Churchil G. R. & Mochis, G. P (1978). Consumer social-ization: a theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal Of Marketing Research, 115
  6. Choi, S. H. & Kim, S. Y. (2000). A study of conspicuous clothing consumption behavior of Korean female X-generation consumer. Journal of the Korean Society of Costume, 50(7), 141-153
  7. Douty, H. I. (1963). Influence of clothing on perception of person. Journal of Home Economics, 55, 197-202
  8. Fischer, E. & Arnold, S. J. (1990). More than a labor of love: gender roles and Christmas shopping. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(December), 333-345
  9. Gibbins, R. A. & Schneider, A. I. (1980). Meaning of garments: relation between impression of an outfit and the message carried by its component gannents. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 51, 287-291
  10. Hirschman, E. C. (1980). Attributes of attributes and layers of meaning. In Advances In Consumer Research, 7
  11. Holbrook, M. B. (1980). Some preliminary notes on research in consumer Esthetics. In Advances In Con-sumer Research, 7
  12. Holman, R. M. (1980). Clothing as communication: an empirical Investigation. In Advances In Consumer Research, 7
  13. Hong, B. S. & Lee, O. K. (1998). The symbolic consump-tion in clothing and related factors. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 22, 781-792
  14. Jo, E. Y. & Lee, O. H.(2000). Materialism and conspicuous consumption in clothing information sources. The Research Journal ofthe Costume Culture, 8(2), 293-304
  15. Jung, Y. G. (1993). A study on correlation between Cloth-ing Involvement and reference group influence. Sook-myung Women's University
  16. Ju, S. R. & Jung, C. J. & Jung, M. S. (2001). A model of adolescent's conspicuous consumption on clothes. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 25(7), 1215-1226
  17. Kasser, T. & Ryan, R. M. (1993). A dark side of the Amer-ican dream: correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. Journal of personality and social psychology, 65(August)
  18. Kim, J. Y. (1998). A study about adolescent conspicuous consumption. Ewha University, Korea
  19. Lee, J. Y. (1999). A study on information source, clothing image and clothing purchase behavior - concentrated on fashion shown on Tv. Sookmyung Women's Uni-versity, Korea
  20. Levy, S. J. (1959). Symbols for sale. Harvard Business Review 37(July-August)
  21. Levy, S. J. (1980). The symbolic analysis of companies, brands, and customers. University of Pittsburgh, (April), Twelfth Annual Albert Wesley Frey Lecture
  22. Levy, S. J. & Sherry, M. M. (1993) The dark side of the gift. Journal of business research, 28(November), 225-245
  23. Mick, D. G. (1996). Are studies of dark side variables con-founded by socially desirable responding? The case of materialism. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(September), 106-119
  24. Paik, K. M. (1996). The propensity for conspicuous con-sumption of urban housewives and its related factors. Seoul National University, Korea
  25. Richins, M. L. (1987). Media, materialism and human hap-piness. Advances In Consumer Research, 14
  26. Rinchins, M. L. & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: scale development and validation. Journal Of Consumer Research, 19(December)
  27. Rokeach, M. A. (1968). A theory of organization and change within value-attitude systems. Journal of Social Issues, 24(1)
  28. Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. N. Y.: Basic Books