산업공학 (IE interfaces)

  • 제17권1호
  • /
  • Pages.56-70
  • /
  • 2004
  • /
  • 1225-0996(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-6465(eISSN)
대한산업공학회 (Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers)
권호 표지

제품 차별화 지연생산의 경제적 타당성: 문헌연구

Economic Evaluation of Delayed Product Differentiation: Literature Review

  • 투고 : 20031000
  • 심사 : 20031200
  • 발행 : 2004.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Expanding product variety and high customer service provision place an enormous burden on demand forecasting and the matching of supply with demand in a supply chain. Postponement of product differentiation has been found to be powerful means to improve supply chain performance in the presence of increasing product variety. Delaying the point of product differentiation implies that the process would not commit the work-in-process into a particular finished product until a later point. This paper reviews the recent analytical models that quantify the value of delayed product differentiation. We conclude the literature review by summarizing and synthesizing the economic evaluation of the postponement and outline directions for future research.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alderson, W. (1950), Marketing Efficiency and the Principle of Postponement, Cost and Profit Outlook, September, 3
  2. Child, P., Diederichs R., Sanders F., and Wisniowsky S. (1991), The Management of Complexity, Sloan Management Review, Fall
  3. Chopra, Sunil and Meindl (2001), Supply Chain Management, Prentice Hall, 237-241
  4. Eppen, G.D. and Schrage, L. (1981), Centralized Ordering Policies in a Mulriwarehouse System with Lead Times and Random Demand, in Multi-Level Production/Inventory Systems: Theory and Practice, L.B. Schwarz (Eds.), North Holland, Amsterdam and New York
  5. Federgruen, A. and Zipkin, P. (1984), Approximations of Dynamic Multi-location Production and Inventory Problems, Management Science, 30
  6. Fisher, M. (1992), Integrating Manufacturing, Logistics and Marketing, paper presented at the ORSA/TIMS Joint National Meeting, San Francisco, CA
  7. Garg, A. and Tang, C. (1997), On Postponement Strategies for Produce Families with Multiple Points of Differentiation, IlE Transaction, 29
  8. Hadley, G. and Whitin, T. (1963), Analysis of Inventory Systems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
  9. Harvard Business School Note (1990), Quick Response in the Apparel Industry, N9-690-038, February 27
  10. Johnson, M. and Anderson, E. (2000), Postponement Strategy for Channel Derivatives, The International Journal of Logistics Management, 11(1)
  11. Lee, H. (1993), Design for Supply Chain Management: Methods and Examples, in Perspectives in Operations Management, R. Sarin (Eds.), Kluwer, Norwell, MA, 45-66
  12. Lee, H. (1996), Effective Inventory and Service Management through Product and Process Design, Operations Research, 44(1)
  13. Lee, H. and Billington, C. (1992), Pitfalls and Opportunities in Supply Chain Inventory Management, Sloan Management Review, 33
  14. Lee, H. and Billington, C. (1994), Designing Products and Processes for Postponement, in Management of Design: Engineering and Management Perspectives, S. Dasu and e. Eastman (Eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, 105-122
  15. Lee, H., Billington, C., and Career, B. (1993), Hewlett-Packard Gains Control of Inventory and Service through Design for Localization, Interfaces, August
  16. Lee, H. and Tang, C. (1997), Modelling the Costs and Benefits of Delayed Product Differentiation, Management Science, 43(1)
  17. Lee, H. and Tang, C. (1998), Variability Reduction Through Operations Reversal, Management Science, 44(2)
  18. Pagh, J.D. and Cooper, M.C. (1998), Supply Chain Postponement and Speculation Strategies: How to Choose the Right Strategy, Journal of Business Logistics, 19(2)
  19. Schwarz, L.B. (1989), Model for Assessing the Value of Warehouse Risk Pooling: Risk Pooling over Outside-Supplier Leadtimes, Management Science, 39
  20. Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P. and Simchi-Levi, E. (2000), Designing and Managing the Supply Chain» Management, McGraw Hill
  21. Ulrich, KT. (1991), Modularity, Variety, and Standardization in Product Design, paper presented at Production and Operations Summer Camp, MIT,Cambridge, MA
  22. Ulrich, KT. and Tung, K (1991), Fundamentals of Product Modularity, working paper, MIT, Cambridge, MA
  23. Whang, S. and Lee, H. (1998), Value of Postponement, in Product Variety Management, Ho T. and C. Tang(Eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Bosron, MA, pp.65-84
  24. Zinn, W. and Bowersox, D.J (1988), Planning Physical Distribution with the Principle of Postponement, Journal of Business Logistics, 9(2)