DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Implementation of a macro model to predict seismic response of RC structural walls

  • Fischinger, Matej (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering) ;
  • Isakovic, Tatjana (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering) ;
  • Kante, Peter (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering)
  • Received : 2003.04.04
  • Accepted : 2004.04.16
  • Published : 2004.05.25

Abstract

A relatively simple multiple-vertical-line-element macro model has been incorporated into a standard computer code DRAIN-2D. It was used in blind predictions of seismic response of cantilever RC walls subjected to a series of consequent earthquakes on a shaking table. The model was able to predict predominantly flexural response with relative success. It was able to predict the stiffness and the strength of the pre-cracked specimen and time-history response of the highly nonlinear wall as well as to simulate the shift of the neutral axis and corresponding varying axial force in the cantilever wall. However, failing to identify the rupture of some brittle reinforcement in the third test, the model was not able to predict post-critical, near collapse behaviour during the subsequent response to two stronger earthquakes. The analysed macro model seems to be appropriate for global analyses of complex building structures with RC structural walls subjected to moderate/strong earthquakes. However, it cannot, by definition, be used in refined research analyses monitoring local behaviour in the post critical region.

Keywords

References

  1. 'CAMUS 3' (1999), International Benchmark, Report I, Specimen and loading characteristics. Specifications for the participants -report. CEA, GEO and AFPS.
  2. Combescure, D. and Chaudat, T. (2000), "ICONS European program seismic tests on R/C bearing walls - CAMUS 3 specimen, CEA", Rapport DMT, SEMT/EMSI/RT/00-014/A.
  3. Eurocode 8 (2002), Design of structures for earthquake resistance, prEN 1998 - final draft.
  4. Fischinger, M., Vidic, T. and Fajfar, P. (1992), "Non-linear seismic analysis of structural walls using the multiplevertical- line-element model", Non-linear Seismic Analysis and Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings, Elsevier, Bled, Slovenia, edited by Peter Fajfar and Helmut Krawinkler, 191-202.
  5. Fischinger, M. and Isakovi , T. (2000a), "Benchmark analysis of structural wall", Proc. 12th WCEE (CD-ROM), Auckland, New Zealand.
  6. Fischinger, M., Isakovi , T. and Kante, P. (2000b), 'CAMUS 3' International Benchmark Report on numerical modelling, IKPIR Report EE - 1/00, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engeering, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  7. Inoue, N., Yang, K and Shibata, A. (1997), "Dynamic non-linear analysis of reinforced concrete shear wall by finite element method with explicit analytical procedure", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 26, 967-986 John Wiley and Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199709)26:9<967::AID-EQE689>3.0.CO;2-T
  8. Kabeyasawa, T., Shiohara, H., Otani, S. and Aoyama, H. (1983), "Analysis of the full-scale seven-story reinforced concrete test structure", J. Fac. Eng., University of Tokyo, 431-478.
  9. Kanaan, A. E. and Powell, G. H. (1973), DRAIN-2D − A general purpose computer program for dynamic analysis of planar structures, Report No. UBC/EERC-73/6, University of California, Berkeley.
  10. Lefas, I. D. and Kotsovos, M. D. (1990), "NLFE analysis of RC structural walls and design implications", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 116, 146-64. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:1(146)
  11. McKenna, F. and Fenves, G. L. (2000a), The OpenSees Command Language Primer, Version 1.1 - Preliminary Draft, PEER, University of California, Berkeley, http://OpenSees.Berkeley.edu.
  12. McKenna, F. and Fenves, G. L. (2000b), "An object-oriented software design for parallel structural analysis", Advanced Technology in Structural Engineering, Proceedings, Structures Congress 2000, ASCE, Washington, D.C.
  13. Moazzami, S. and Bertero, V.V. (1987), "Three-dimensional inelastic analysis of reinforced concrete frame-wall structures", Report No.UCB/EERC-87/05, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
  14. Perus, I., Fajfar, P. and Grabec, I. (1994), "Prediction of the seismic capacity of RC structural walls by nonparametric multidimensional regression", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 23, 1139-1155. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290231008
  15. U. S. - Japan Cooperative Research Programs (1984), "Tests of reinforced concrete structures", Proc. the 8th WCEE, Prentice Hall, San Francisco, 593-706.
  16. Vulcano, A., Bertero, V. V. and Caloti, V. (1989), "Analytical modeling of R/C structural walls", Proc. the 9th WCEE, Tokyo-Kyoto, Maruzen, 6, 41-46.

Cited by

  1. An adaptive modal pushover analysis procedure (VMPA-A) for buildings subjected to bi-directional ground motions 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0324-x
  2. Shake-Table Response of a Coupled RC Wall with Thin T-Shaped Piers vol.143, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001718
  3. Ductility enhancement of reinforced concrete thin walls vol.2, pp.2, 2005, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2005.2.2.111
  4. Numerical simulation of performance of near-surface mounted FRP-upgraded beam–column sub-assemblages under cyclic loading vol.11, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2014.926376
  5. Comparative Study of State-of-the-Art Macroscopic Models for Planar Reinforced Concrete Walls vol.115, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14359/51710835
  6. Numerical analysis of under-designed reinforced concrete beam-column joints under cyclic loading vol.7, pp.3, 2004, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2010.7.3.203
  7. Behaviour of RC buildings with large lightly reinforced walls along the perimeter vol.73, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.038
  8. Efficient membrane element for cyclic response of RC panels vol.20, pp.3, 2004, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2017.20.3.351
  9. Assessment of a force-displacement based multiple-vertical-line element to simulate the non-linear axial-shear-flexure interaction behaviour of reinforced concrete walls vol.17, pp.12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00680-7