Investigation of Adsorption Mechanism and Selective Adsorption of Carbonyl Compounds of Mainstream Tobacco Smoke by Ion Exchangers

이온교환체에 의한 담배 주류연 중 카보닐 화합물의 선택적 흡착 특성 및 흡착 메카니즘 구명

  • Lee John-Tae (Analysis Center, KT&G Central Research Institute) ;
  • Kim Hyo-Keun (Analysis Center, KT&G Central Research Institute) ;
  • Ji Sang-Un (Analysis Center, KT&G Central Research Institute) ;
  • Hwang Keon-Joong (Analysis Center, KT&G Central Research Institute) ;
  • Rhee Moon-Soo (Analysis Center, KT&G Central Research Institute) ;
  • Park Jin-Won (Analysis Center, KT&G Central Research Institute)
  • 이존태 (KT&G 중앙연구원 분석센터) ;
  • 김효근 (KT&G 중앙연구원 분석센터) ;
  • 지상운 (KT&G 중앙연구원 분석센터) ;
  • 황건중 (KT&G 중앙연구원 분석센터) ;
  • 이문수 (KT&G 중앙연구원 분석센터) ;
  • 박진원 (KT&G 중앙연구원 분석센터)
  • Published : 2004.12.01

Abstract

This work has been conducted to select appropriate filter materials for removing carbonyl compounds in mainstream tobacco smoke. To investigate of the usability of this filter materials, two types of bead ion exchangers were synthesized and their adsorption characteristics for carbonyl compounds were investigated. Sulfonic acid group-containing cation exchanger and ammonium group-containing anion exchanger were synthesized by the suspension polymerization of glycidylmethacrylate(GMA) and divinylbenzene(DVB) followed by the subsequent functionalization, respectively. The removal efficiency of carbonyl compounds by these two ion exchangers increased in the presence of moisture. However, the amount of carbonyl compounds adsorbed on the anion exchanger was larger than that on the cation exchanger under two levels of water contents tested. This phenomenon seems to arise from the electron delocalization in carbonyl group of the anion exchangers. There was not any significant relationship between the amount of carbonyl compounds adsorbed on ion exchangers and the length of adsorption column. From the large ion exchange capacity and rapid ion exchange reaction rate of the anion exchanger, it is suggested that the anion exchanger may be a good filter material for removing carbonyl compounds in the mainstream tobacco smoke.

Keywords

References

  1. Budavari S. (1996) The Merck Index, $12^{th}$ ed., Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, N.J., USA
  2. Chen P. X. and Moldoveanu S. C. (2003) Main stream Smoke Chemical Analyses for 2R4F Kentucky Reference Cigarette. Beitr$\ddot a$ze zur Tabakforschung International 20 : 448-458
  3. Health Canada (1999) Determination of Selected Carbonyls in Mainstream Tobacco smoke.Tobacco Control Programme, Health Canada Official Method T-104
  4. Helfferich F. (1962) lon Exchanger, P. 25-39 McGraw-Hill Company, New-York, USA
  5. Hwang T. S., Lee S. A. and Lee M. J. (2001) Synthesis of Aminated GMA DVB Copolymer and Their Adsorption Properties forNitrate. PoIym. Korea 25 (3) : 311-318
  6. ISO 3308:2000(E) Routine Analytical Cigarette Smoking Machine-Definitions and Standard Conditions
  7. Kim H. K., Lee J. T., Yoon O. S. and Rhee M. S.(2003) The Effect of Solvent Trap Apparatus on the Analysis of Carbonyl Compounds in Cigarette Smoke. J. Kor. Soc. Toba. Sci. 25 (2) : 137-14
  8. Surgeon General's report (1964)
  9. Smith C. J. and Hansch C. (2000) The RelativeToxicity of Compounds in Mainstream Cigarette Smoke Condensate. Food Chem.Toxicot. 38 : 637-646 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-6915(00)00051-X
  10. Wachinski A. M. and Etzel J. E. (1997) Environmental lon Exchange : Principles and Design. Lewis Publishers, New York. USA
  11. World Health Organiazation, Advandng Knowledge on Regulating Tobacco Products. (2001) World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland