대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제42권6호
  • /
  • Pages.664-670
  • /
  • 2004
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지

THE EFFECT OF ABUTMENT HEIGHT ON SCREW LOOSENING IN SINGLE IMPLANT-SUPPORTED PROSTHESES AFTER DYNAMIC CYCLIC LOADING

  • Kim Nam-Gun (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim Yung-Soo (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim Chang-Whe (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jang Kyung-Soo (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lim Young-Jun (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University)
  • 발행 : 2004.12.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Statement of problem. One of the common problems of dental implant prosthesis is the loosening of the screw that connects each component, and this problem is more common in single implant-supported prostheses with external connection. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to examine the changes of detorque values of abutment screws with external connection in different abutment heights. Materials and methods. After cyclic loading on three different abutment heights, detorque values were measured. Abutments were retained with titanium abutment screws tightened to 30 Ncm (30.5 kgmm) with digital torque gauge as recommended by the manufacturer. Replacing abutments, implants and titanium abutment screws with new ones at every measurement, initial detorque values were measured six times. In measuring de torque values after cyclic loading, Avana Cemented Abutments of 4.0 mm collar, 7.0 mm height (Osstem Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea) were used with three different lengths of 5.0, 8.0, 11.0 mm. Shorter abutments were made by milling of 11.0 mm abutment to have the same force-exercised area of 4.5 mm diameter. Sine curve force (20N-320N, 14Hz) was applied, and detorque values were measured after cyclic loading of 2 million times by loading machine. Detorque values of initial and after-loading were measured by digital torque gauge. One-way ANOVA was employed to see if there was any influence from different abutment heights. Results. The results were as follows: 1. The initial detorque value was 27.8$\pm$0.93 kgmm, and the ratio of the initial detorque value to the tightening torque was 0.91(27.8/30.5). 2. Measured detorque values after cyclic loading were declined as the height of the abutment increased, that was, 5.0 mm; 22.3$\pm$0.82 kgmm, 8.0 mm; 21.8$\pm$0.93 kgmm, and 11.0 mm; 21.3$\pm$0.94 kgmm. 3. One-way ANOVA showed no statistically significant differences among these (p>0.05). 4. Noticeable mobility at the implant-abutment interface was not observed in any case after cyclic loading at all.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Adell R, Lekholm U, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
  2. Laney WR, Jemt T, Harris D, Henry PJ, Krogh PH, PolizziG et al. Osseointegrated implants for single-tooth replacement: progress report from a multicenter prospective study after3 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:49-54
  3. BinonPP. The effect of implant/abutment hexagonal misfit on screw joint stability. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:149-160
  4. Jemt T. Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Br$\aa$nemark implants in edentulous jaws: A study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:270-276
  5. Jemt T. Multicenter study ofoverdentures supported by Br$\aa$nemark. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:513-522
  6. Jemt T, Linden B, Lekholm U. Failures and complications in 127 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Br$\aa$nemark implants: From prostheses treatment to first annual check up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:40-43
  7. Artzi Z, Dreiangel A. A screw lock for single-tooth implant superstructures. J Am Dent Assoc 1999;130:677-682 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1999.0277
  8. Carr AB, Grunski JB, Hurley E. Effects of fabrication, finishing, and polishing procedures on preload in prostheses using conventional gold and plastic cylinders. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:589-598
  9. Jemt T, Lekholm U, Grondahl K. A 3-year follow-up study of early single implant restorations ad modurn Br$\aa$ncmark. Int J Perio Rest Dent 1990;10:341-349
  10. Jemt T, Laney WR, Harris D, Henry PJ, Krogh PH, Polizzi G et al. Osseointegrated implants for single tooth-replacement: a 1-year report from a multicenter prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:29-36
  11. Ekfeldt A, Carlsson GE, Borjesson G. Clinical evaluation of single-tooth restorations supported by osseointegrated implants: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:179-183
  12. Haas R, Mensdorff-Pouilly N, Mailath G, Watzek G. Br?nemark single tooth implants: a preli-minary report of 76 implants. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:274-279 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80205-7
  13. Henry PJ, Laney WR, Jemt T, Harris D, Krogh PH, Polizzi G et al. Osseointegrated implants for single tooth-replacement: a prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:450-455
  14. Becker W, Becker BE. Replacement of maxillary and mandibular molars with single endosseous implant restorations: a retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:51-55 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80229-X
  15. Wie H. Registration of localization, occlusion and occluding materials for failing screw joints in the Br$\aa$nemark implant system. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:47-53 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060106.x
  16. Carl JD. A clinical study of the efficacy of gold-tite square abutment screws in cement-retained implant restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:273-278
  17. Schwarz MS. Mechanical complications of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11 Suppl 1:156-158. Review
  18. Cavazos E, Bell FA. Preventing loosening of implant abutment screws. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:566-569 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90464-3
  19. Cibirka RM, Nelson SK, Lang BR, Rueggeberg FA. Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:268-275 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.114266
  20. ISO/DIS 14801 Dental implants-Dynamic continuous fatigue test. International Organization for Standardization, 2001
  21. Jaarda MJ, Razzoog ME, Gratton DG. Geometrical comparison of five interchangeable implant prosthetic retaining screws. J Prosthet Dent 1995;9:373-379
  22. Rangert BR, Sullivan RM, Jemt TM. Load factor control for implants in the posterior partially edentulous segment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:360-370
  23. Balfour A, O' Brien GR. Comparative study of antirotational single tooth abutments. J Prosthet Dent 1995;7:36-43
  24. Beat RM, Stephan H, Urs CB. Mechanics of the implant-abutment connection: An 8-degree taper compared to butt joint connection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:519-526
  25. Norton MR. An in vitro evaluation of the strength of an internal conical interface compared to a butt joint interface in implant design. Clin Oral Impl Res 1997;8:290-298 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080407.x
  26. McGlumphy E. Keeping implants screws: Are we beyond retrievability. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:628
  27. Bankaeen LG, Winkler S, Neff PA. The effect of implant diameter, restoration design, and occlusal table variations on screw loosening of posterior single-tooth implant restorations. J Oral Implantol 2001;27:63-72 https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2001)027<0063:TEOIDR>2.3.CO;2
  28. Bickford JH. An introduction to the design and behavior of bolted joints. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1995. p.515-564
  29. Lee JS, Kim YS, Kim CW, Han JS. Wave analysis of implant screw loosening using an air cylindrical cyclic loading device. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:402-408 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.128099
  30. Gibb CH, Mahan PE, Mauderli A, Lundeen HC, Walsh EK. Limits of human bite strength. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:226-229 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90480-4
  31. Schulte JK, Coffey J. Comparison of screw retention of nine abutment systems: a pilot study. Implant Dent 1997;6:28-31
  32. Weinberg LA, Kruger B. A comparison of implant/ prosthesis loading with four clinical variables. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:421-433