Steel and Composite Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Energy-based seismic design of structures with buckling-restrained braces

  • Kim, Jinkoo (Department of Architectural Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Choi, Hyunhoon (Department of Architectural Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Chung, Lan (Department of Architectural Engineering, Dankook University)
  • Received : 2004.02.05
  • Accepted : 2004.11.19
  • Published : 2004.12.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A simplified seismic design procedure for steel structures with buckling-restrained braces (BRB) was proposed based on the energy balance concept and the equal energy assumption. The input seismic energy was estimated from a design spectrum, and the elastic and hysteretic energy were computed using energy balance concept. The size of braces was determined so that the hysteretic energy demand was equal to the hysteretic energy dissipated by the BRB. The validity of using equivalent single-degree-of-freedom systems to estimate seismic input and hysteretic energy demand in multi story structures with BRB was investigated through time-history analysis. The story-wise distribution pattern of hysteretic energy demands was also obtained and was applied in the design process. According to analysis results, the maximum displacements of the 3-story structure designed in accordance with the proposed procedure generally coincided with the target displacements on the conservative side. The maximum displacements of the 6- and 8-story structures, however, turned out to be somewhat smaller than the target values due to the participation of higher vibration modes.

Keywords

References

  1. Akbas, B., Shen, J. and Hao, H. (2001),"Energy approach in performance-based seismic design of steel moment resisting frames for basic safety objective", The Structural Design of Tall Buildings, 10, 193-217. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.172
  2. ATC (1996),"Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings", ATC-40, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California.
  3. Black, C., Makris, N. and Aiken, I. (2002),"Component testing, stability analysis and characterization of buckling restrained braces", Final Report to Nippon Steel Corporation, Japan.
  4. Chou, C.C., and Uang, C.M. (2002),"Evaluation of site-specific energy demand for building structures", Seventh U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Boston, Massachusetts.
  5. Estes, K.R. and Anderson, J.C. (2002),"Hysteretic energy demands in multistory buildings", Seventh U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Boston, Massachusetts.
  6. Huang, Y.H., Wada, A., Sugihara, H., Narikawa, M., Takeuchi, T., and Iwata, M. (2000),"Seismic performance of moment resistant steel frame with hysteretic damper", Proc. of the Third Int. Conf. STESSA, Montreal, Canada.
  7. International code council (2000), 2000 International building code, Int. Conf. Building Officials.
  8. Iwata, M., Kato, T. and Wada, A. (2000),"Buckling-restrained braces as hysteretic dampers", Proc. of Behavior of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas, Balkema, Rotterdam.
  9. Leelataviwat, S., Goel, S.C. and Stojadinovic, B. (2002),"Energy-based seismic design of structures using yield mechanism and target drift", J. Struct. Eng., 128(8), 1046-1054. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:8(1046)
  10. Leger, P. and Dussault, S. (1992),"Seismic-energy dissipation in MDOF structures", J. Struct. Eng., 118(5), 1251-1269. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:5(1251)
  11. Riddell, R. and Garcia, J.E. (2001),"Hysteretic energy spectrum and damage control", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 30(12), 1791-1816. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.93
  12. Saeki, E., Maeda, Y., Nakamura, H., Midorikawa, M., and Wada, A. (1995),"Experimental study on practicalscale unbonded braces", J. Struct. Construct. Eng., 476, 149-158.
  13. SEAOC (2001),"Recommend provisions for buckling-restrained braced frames", in draft form, Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento, CA.
  14. Somerville, P., Smith, H., Puriyamurthala, S. and Sun, J. (1997),"Development of ground motion time histories for phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC steel project", SAC Joint Venture, SAC/BD-97/04.
  15. Tremblay, R., Degrange, D. and Blouin, J. (1999),"Seismic rehabilitation of a four-story building with a stiffened bracing system", Proc. of the 8th Canadian Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, 549-554.
  16. Tsai, K.C. and Li, J.W. (1997),"DRAIN2D+, A general purpose computer program for static and dynamic analyses of inelastic 2D structures supplemented with a graphic processor", Report No. CEER/R86-07, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  17. Uang, C.M. and Bertero, V.V. (1988),"Use of energy as a design criterion in earthquake-resistant design", Report No. UCB/EERC-88/18, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley.
  18. Vanmarcke, E.H. and Gasparini, D.A. (1976),"A program for artificial motion generation, user's manual and documentation", Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  19. Yamaguchi, M., et al., (2000),"Earthquake resistant performance of moment resistant steel frames with damper", Proc. of Behavior of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas, Balkema, Rotterdam.

Cited by

  1. Seismic design of buckling-restrained braced frames based on a modified energy-balance concept vol.33, pp.10, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1139/l06-068
  2. Seismic design, nonlinear analysis, and performance evaluation of recentering buckling-restrained braced frames (BRBFs) vol.14, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-014-1201-3
  3. Energy-based seismic design of buckling-restrained braced frames using hysteretic energy spectrum vol.28, pp.2, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.08.008
  4. Derivation of energy-based base shear force coefficient considering hysteretic behavior and P-delta effects vol.17, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-018-0431-3
  5. Structural behavior of conventional and buckling restrained braced frames subjected to near-field ground motions vol.7, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.7.4.553
  6. An equivalent SDOF system model for estimating the response of R/C building structures with proportional hysteretic dampers subjected to earthquake motions vol.40, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1049
  7. Energy-based design method for seismic retrofitting with passive energy dissipation systems vol.46, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.07.011
  8. Constant Ductility Energy Factors for the Near-Fault Pulse-Like Ground Motions vol.21, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1157529
  9. Earthquake response of ten-story story-drift-controlled reinforced concrete frames with hysteretic dampers vol.32, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.02.025
  10. Evaluation of seismic energy demand and its application on design of buckling-restrained braced frames vol.31, pp.1, 2009, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2009.31.1.093
  11. Seismic behavior factors of buckling-restrained braced frames vol.33, pp.3, 2004, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2009.33.3.261
  12. Cyclic test of buckling restrained braces composed of square steel rods and steel tube vol.13, pp.5, 2004, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2012.13.5.423
  13. Energy-Based Seismic Design Method for EBFs Based on Hysteretic Energy Spectra and Accumulated Ductility Ratio Spectra vol.2019, pp.None, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3180596
  14. Design of buckling restrained braces with composite technique vol.35, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.35.5.687
  15. Performance of innovative composite buckling-restrained fuse for concentrically braced frames under cyclic loading vol.36, pp.2, 2004, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.36.2.163
  16. Seismic Retrofit of an Existing Reinforced Concrete Building with Buckling-restrained Braces vol.15, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874149502115010203
  17. Experimental study on steel hysteretic column dampers for seismic retrofit of structures vol.40, pp.4, 2004, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2021.40.4.495
  18. Improving the seismic performance of reinforced concrete frames using an innovative metallic-shear damper vol.28, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2021.28.3.275