Wind and Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Accumulation of wind induced damage on bilinear SDOF systems

  • Hong, H.P. (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Western Ontario)
  • Received : 2002.12.09
  • Accepted : 2004.03.19
  • Published : 2004.06.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The evaluation of the accumulation of permanent set for inelastic structures due to wind action is important in establishing a criterion to select a reduced design wind load and in incorporating the beneficial ductile behaviour in wind engineering. A parametric study of the accumulation of the permanent set as well as the ductility demand for bilinear single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems is presented in the present study. The dynamic analysis of the inelastic SDOF system is carried out using the method of Newmark for artificially generated time history of wind speed. Simulation results indicate that the mean of the normalized damage rate is highly dependent on the natural frequency of vibration. This mean value is relatively insensitive to the damping ratio if the damping ratio is larger than 5%. The scatter associated with the accumulation of the permanent set is very significant. The consideration of the postyield stiffness can significantly reduce the accumulation of the permanent set if the ratio of the yield strength to the expected peak response is small. The results also show that the ductility demand due to the wind action over a period of one hour for flexible structures can be much less than that for rigid structures or structures with larger damping ratio if the SDOF systems are designed with a reduced peak response caused by the fluctuating wind.

Keywords

References

  1. Chen, D. and Davenport, A.G. (2000), "Vulnerability of tall buildings in typhoons", Proc. the International Conference on Advances in Structural Dynamics, Hong Kong.
  2. Chopra, A.K. (2000), Dynamics of Structures, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
  3. Davenport, A.G. (1961), "The spectrum of horizontal gustiness near the ground in high wind", J. Royal Meteorol. Soc., 87, 194-211. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49708737208
  4. Davenport, A.G. (1964), "Note on the distribution of the largest value of a random function with application to gust loading", Proc. Inst. of Civil Engineers, 24, pp. 187-196.
  5. Shinozuka, M. (1972), "Monte Carlo Solution of Structure Dynamics", Int. Comput. Struct., 2, 855-874. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(72)90043-0
  6. Shinozuka, M. (1987), Stochastic Fields and Their Digital Simulation, in Stochastic Mechanics, (ed. M. Shinozuka), Department of Civil Engineering & Engineering Mechanics, Columbia University, New York.
  7. Simiu, E. and Scanlan, R.H. (1996), Wind Effects on Structures, Fundamentals and Applications to Design, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York.
  8. Tshcanz, T. (1983), "The base balance measurement techniques and applications to dynamic wind loading of structures", Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario.
  9. Vickery, B.J. (1970), "Wind action on simple yielding structures", J. Eng. Mech. Div., ASCE, 96(EM2), 107-120.
  10. Wyatt, T.A. and May, H. (1971), "Ultimate load behaviour of structures under wind loading", Proc. the 3rd International Conference on Wind Effects on Buildings and Structures, 501-510.

Cited by

  1. Inelastic responses of wind-excited tall buildings: Improved estimation and understanding by statistical linearization approaches vol.159, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.12.041
  2. Relationship between specified ductility and strength demand reduction for single degree-of-freedom systems under extreme wind events vol.109, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2012.06.006
  3. Nonlinear inelastic responses of transmission tower-line system under downburst wind vol.123, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.05.047
  4. Modeling of Nonstationary Winds and Its Applications vol.142, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001047
  5. Effect of human error on the reliability of roof panel under uplift wind pressure vol.52, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.07.001
  6. An efficient framework for the elasto-plastic reliability assessment of uncertain wind excited systems vol.58, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2015.09.001
  7. Assessment of capacity curves for transmission line towers under wind loading vol.13, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2010.13.1.001
  8. Probabilistic performance assessment of inelastic wind excited structures within the setting of distributed plasticity vol.84, pp.None, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.101923
  9. Performance-based wind design of tall buildings: concepts, frameworks, and opportunities vol.31, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2020.31.2.103
  10. Simulation of Nonstationary and Nonhomogeneous Wind Velocity Field by Using Frequency-Wavenumber Spectrum vol.7, pp.None, 2004, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.636815
  11. Nonlinear Dynamic Response of Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems Subjected to Along-Wind Loads. II: Implications for Structural Reliability vol.147, pp.11, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0003124
  12. Nonlinear Dynamic Response of Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems Subjected to Along-Wind Loads. I: Parametric Study vol.147, pp.11, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0003125
  13. Inelastic Performance of High-Rise Buildings to Simultaneous Actions of Alongwind and Crosswind Loads vol.148, pp.2, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0003236
  14. Upper Limit of Aerodynamic Forces for Inelastic Wind Design vol.148, pp.2, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0003260