Structural Engineering and Mechanics

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

State-of-the-art of semiactive control systems using MR fluid dampers in civil engineering applications

  • Jung, H.J. (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Sejong University) ;
  • Spencer, B.F. Jr. (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) ;
  • Ni, Y.Q. (Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic University) ;
  • Lee, I.W. (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2003.01.10
  • Accepted : 2003.12.25
  • Published : 2004.03.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Semiactive control systems have received considerable attention for protecting structures against natural hazards such as strong earthquakes and high winds, because they not only offer the reliability of passive control systems but also maintain the versatility and adaptability of fully active control systems. Among the many semiactive control devices, magnetorheological (MR) fluid dampers comprise one particularly promising class. In the field of civil engineering, much research and development on MR fluid damper-based control systems has been conducted since this unique semiactive device was first introduced to civil engineering applications in mid 1990s. In 2001, MR fluid dampers were applied to the full-scale in-service civil engineering structures for the first time. This state-of-the-art paper includes a detailed literature review of dynamic models of MR fluid dampers for describing their complex dynamic behavior and control algorithms considering the characteristics of MR fluid dampers. This extensive review provides references to semiactive control systems using MR fluid dampers. The MR fluid damper-based semiactive control systems are shown to have the potential for mitigating the responses of full-scale civil engineering structures under natural hazards.

Keywords

References

  1. Baker, G.A., Johnson, E.A., Spencer, Jr., B.F. and Fujino, Y. (1999), "Modeling and semiactive damping of staycables", Proc. of the 13th ASCE Eng. Mech. Conf., Baltimore, Maryland, USA, CD-ROM.
  2. Butz, T. and von Stryk, O. (2002), "Modelling and simulation of electro- and magnetorheological fluiddampers", ZAMM: Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 82, 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4001(200201)82:1<3::AID-ZAMM3>3.0.CO;2-O
  3. Carlson, J.D. and Weiss, K.D. (1994), "A growing attraction to magnetic fluids", Machine Des., (Aug.), 61-64.
  4. Carlson, J.D., Catanzarite, D.M. and St. Clair, K.A. (1995), "Commercial magneto-rheolgoical fluid devices",First Int. Conf. on ER Fluids, MR Fluids and Associated Technol., Sheffield, U.K.
  5. Chang, C.-C. and Roschke, P.N. (1998), "Neural network modeling of a magnetorheological damper", J.Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 9, 755-764. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X9800900908
  6. Chang, C.-C. and Zhou, L. (2002), "Neural network emulation of inverse dynamics for a MR damper", J. Struct.Eng., ASCE, 128(2), 231-239. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:2(231)
  7. Chen, Z.Q., Wang, X.Y., Ni, Y.Q. and Ko, J.M. (2002a), "Field measurement on wind-rain-induced vibration ofbridge cables with and without MR dampers", Proc. of the 3rd Int. Conf. Structural Control, Como, Italy.
  8. Chen, Y., Ni, Y.Q. and Ko, J.M. (2002b), "Applicability of passive and active devices for vibration control oflong-span bridge cables", Research Report, Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, The Hong KongPolytechnic University, Hong Kong.
  9. Christenson, R.E. (2001), "Semiactive control of civil structures for natural hazard mitigation: analytical andexperimental studies", Ph.D dissertation, University of Notre Dame, Indiana, USA.
  10. Christenson, R.E. and Spencer, Jr., B.F. (1999a), "Coupled building control using 'smart' dampers", Proc. 13thASCE Engineeing Mechanics Conf., Baltimore, Maryland, USA, CD-ROM.
  11. Christenson, R.E., Spencer, Jr., B.F. and Johnson, E.A. (1999b), "Coupled building control using active andsmart damping strategies", Optimization and Control in Civil and Structural Engineering (B.H.V. Topping andB. Kumar eds.), Civil-Comp Press, 187-195.
  12. Christenson, R.E., Spencer, Jr., B.F. and Johnson, E.A. (2000), "Coupled building control using 'smart' dampingstrategies", Proc. of the Smart Systems for Bridges, Structures, and Highways, the 7th SPIE AnnualInternational Smart Structures and NDE Symposia, Newport Beach, CA, USA.
  13. Christenson, R.E., Spencer, Jr., B.F. and Johnson, E.A. (2001), "Experimental verification of semiactive dampingof stay cables", Proc. of the 2001 American Control Conf., Arlington, Virginia, USA, 5058-5063.
  14. Christenson, R.E., Spencer, Jr., B.F. and Johnson, E.A. (2002), "Experimental studies on the smart damping ofstay cables", Proc. of the 2002 Structures Congress, Denver, Colorado, USA, CD-ROM.
  15. Dyke, S.J. (1998), "Seismic protection of a benchmark building using magnetorheological dampers", Proc. 2ndWorld Conf. Structural Control, Kyoto, Japan, 2, 1455-1462.
  16. Dyke, S.J. and Spencer, Jr., B.F. (1996), "Seismic response control using multiple MR dampers", Proc. of the2nd Int. Workshop on Structural Control, Hong Kong, 163-173.
  17. Dyke, S.J. and Spencer, Jr., B.F. (1997), "A comparison of semi-active control strategies for the MR damper",Proc. of the IASTED Int. Conf. Intelligent Information Systems, The Bahamas.
  18. Dyke, S.J., Spencer, Jr., B.F., Sain, M.K. and Carlson, J.D. (1996a), "Modeling and control ofmagnetorheological dampers for seismic response reduction", Smart Materials and Structures, 5, 565-575. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/5/5/006
  19. Dyke, S.J., Spencer, Jr., B.F., Sain, M.K. and Carlson, J.D. (1996b), "Experimental verification of semi-activestructural control strategies using acceleration feedback", Proc. of the 3rd Int. Conf. Motion and VibrationControl, Chiba, Japan, III, 291-296.
  20. Dyke, S.J., Spencer, Jr., B.F., Sain, M.K. and Carlson, J.D. (1998), "An experimental study of MR dampers forseismic protection", Smart Materials and Structures: Special Issue on Smart Materials and StructuresTechnology: Application to Large Civil Infrastructure, 7, 693-703.
  21. Dyke, S.J., Caicedo, J.M., Turan, G., Caicedo, J.M., Bergman, L.A. and Hague, S. (2003), "Phase I benchmarkcontrol problem for seismic response of cable-stayed bridges", J. Struct. Eng., 129(7), 857-872. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:7(857)
  22. Erkus, B., Abe, M. and Fujino, Y., (2002), "Investigation of semi-active control for seismic protection ofelevated highway bridges", Eng. Struct., 24, 281-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00095-5
  23. Fujitani, H. et al. (2003), "Development of 400 kN magnetorheological damper for a real base-isolated building",Proc. of SPIE Conf. Smart Structures and Materials, 5057.
  24. Gamota, D.R. and Filisko, F.E. (1991), "Dynamic mechanical studies of electrorheological materials: moderatefrequencies", J. of Rheology, 35, 399-425. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.550221
  25. Hiemenz, G.J., Choi, Y.T. and Wereley, N.M. (2003), "Seismic control of civil structures using semi-active MRbraces", Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 18, 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8667.t01-1-00297
  26. Jansen, L.M. and Dyke, S.J. (1999), "Investigation of nonlinear control strategies for the implementation ofmultiple magnetorheological dampers", Proc. of the 1999 ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conf., Baltimore,Maryland, USA.
  27. Jansen, L.M. and Dyke, S.J. (2000), "Semi-active control strategies for the MR damper: a comparative study", J.Eng. Mech., ASCE, 126(8), 795-803. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:8(795)
  28. Jin, G., Sain, M.K., Pham, K.D., Spencer, Jr., B.F. and Ramallo, J.C. (2001), "Modeling MR-dampers: anonlinear blackbox approach", Proc. of the American Control Conference, Arlington, Virginia, USA.
  29. Jin, G., Sain, M.K. and Spencer, Jr., B.F. (2002), "Modeling MR-dampers: the ridgenet estimation approach",Proc. of the American Control Conference, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.
  30. Johnson, E.A., Ramallo, J.C., Spencer, Jr., B.F. and Sain, M.K. (1998), "Intelligent base isolation systems", Proc.of the Second World Conf. on Structural Control (2WCSC), Kyoto, Japan, 1, 367-376.
  31. Johnson, E.A., Spencer, Jr., B.F. and Fujino, Y. (1999), "Semiactive damping of stay cables: a preliminarystudy", Proc. of the 17th Int. Modal Analysis Conf., Kissimmee, Florida, USA, 417-423.
  32. Johnson, E.A., Baker, G.A., Spencer, Jr., B.F. and Fujino, Y. (2000a), "Mitigating stay cable oscillation usingsemiactive damping", Smart Structures and Materials 2000: Smart Systems for Bridges, Structures andHighways (S.C. Liu ed.), Newport Beach, California, USA, 3988, 207-216.
  33. Johnson, E.A., Christenson, R.E. and Spencer, Jr., B.F. (2000b), "Semiactive damping of cables with sag", Proc.of the Int. Conf. on Advances in Structural Dynamics (ASD2000) (J.M. Ko and Y.L. Xu eds.), Hong Kong,327-334.
  34. Johnson, E.A., Christenson, R.E. and Spencer, Jr., B.F. (2001), "Smart stay cable damping - effects of sag andinclination (invited)", Proc. of the 8th Int. Conf. Structural Safety and Reliability (ICOSSAR'01), NewportBeach, California, USA, CD-ROM.
  35. Johnson, E.A., Baker, G.A., Spencer, Jr., B.F. and Fujino, Y. (2002), "Semiactive damping of stay cables", J.Eng. Mech., ASCE, in press.
  36. Jung, H.-J., Spencer Jr., B.F. and Lee, I.-W. (2001), "Benchmark control problem of seismically excited cablestayedbridges using smart damping strategies", Proc. of the IABSE Conf. on Cable-Supported Bridges -Challenging Technical Limits, Seoul, Korea, Serial 84, 256-257 (Full paper in CD-ROM).
  37. Jung, H.-J., Spencer, Jr., B.F. and Lee, I.-W. (2002), "Seismic protection of cable-stayed bridges usingmagnetorheological dampers", Proc. of the Seventh U.S. Nat. Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Boston,Massachusetts, USA, CD-ROM.
  38. Jung, H.-J., Spencer, Jr., B.F. and Lee, I.-W. (2003), "Control of seismically excited cable-stayed bridgeemploying magnetorheological fluid dampers", J. Struct. Eng., 129(7), 873-883. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:7(873)
  39. Kamath, G.M. and Wereley, N. (1997), "Nonlinear viscoelastic-plastic mechanism-based model of anelectrorheological damper", J. Guidance, Control Dynamics, 20, 1125. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4167
  40. Ko, J.M., Ni, Y.Q., Chen, Z.Q. and Spencer, Jr., B.F. (2002a), "Implementation of MR dampers to donting LakeBridge for cable vibration control", Proc. of the 3rd Int. Conf. Structural Control, Como, Italy.
  41. Ko, J.M., Zheng, G., Chen, Z.Q. and Ni, Y.Q. (2002b), "Field vibration tests of bridge stay cables incorporatedwith magneto-rheological (MR) dampers", Smart Structures and Materials 2002: Smart Systems for Bridges,Structures, and Highways (S.C. Liu and D.J. Pines eds.), SPIE 4696.
  42. Koh, H.M., Park, W., Park, K.S., Ok, S.Y. and Hahm, D. (2001), "Performance evaluation and cost effectivenessof semi-active vibration control system for cable-stayed bridges under earthquake excitation", Proc. of theIABSE Conf. on Cable-Supported Bridges - Challenging Technical Limits, Seoul, Korea, Serial 84, 258-259(Full paper in CD-ROM).
  43. Leva, A. and Piroddi, L. (2002), "NARX-based technique for the modeling of magneto-rheological dampingdevices", Smart Materials and Structures, 11, 79-88. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/11/1/309
  44. Li, W.H., Yao, G.Z., Chen, G., Yeo, S.H. and Yap, F.F. (2000), "Testing and steady state modeling of a linearMR damper under sinusoidal loading", Smart Materials and Structures, 9, 95-102. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/9/1/310
  45. Li, J. and Samali, B. (2001), "Sliding mode control of five story benchmark model with magnetorheological(MR) damper", Proc. of the eighth Ease Asia-Pacific Conf. on Structural Engineering and Construction,Singapore, Paper No. 1534, CD-ROM.
  46. Liu, Y., Gordaninejad, F., Evrensel, C.A. and Wang, X. (2000), "Semi-active control of a bridge usingcontrollable magneto-rheological dampers", Smart Systems for Bridges, Structures, and Highways, Proc. ofSPIE Conf. on Smart Materials and Structures (S.C. Liu ed), Newport Beach, California, USA, 3988, 199-206.
  47. Liu, Y., Gordaninejad, F., Evrensel, C.A. and Hitchcock, G. (2001), "Experimental study on fuzzy logic vibrationcontrol of a bridge using fail-safe magnetorheological fluid dampers", Smart Systems for Bridges, Structures,and Highways, Proc. of SPIE Conf. on Smart Materials and Structures (S.C. Liu ed), Newport Beach,California, USA, 4330, 281-288.
  48. Lou, W.J., Ni, Y.Q. and Ko, J.M. (2001), "Modal damping and stepping-switch control of stay cables withmagnetorheological fluid dampers", Smart Structures and Materials 2001: Smart Systems for Bridges,Structures, and Highways (S.C. Liu ed.), SPIE 4330, 354-365.
  49. Moon, S.J., Bergman, L.A. and Voulgaris, P.G. (2002), "Sliding mode control of a cable-stayed bridge subjectedto seismic excitation", Proc. of the 7th US Nat. Conf. Earthquake Engineering, Boston, Massachusetts, USA,CD-ROM.
  50. Moon, S.J., Bergman, L.A. and Voulgaris, P.G. (2003), "Sliding mode control of cable-stayed bridge subjected toseismic excitation", J. Eng. Mech., ASCE, 129(1), 71-78. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2003)129:1(71)
  51. Ni, Y.Q. (2002), "Implementation of magneto-rheological dampers to cable-stayed bridges for wind-rain-inducedvibration control", Seminar at KAIST, Daejeon, Korea.
  52. Ni, Y.Q., Cao, D.Q., Ko, J.M. and Chen, Y. (2000), "Neuro-control of inclined sagged cables using semi-activeMR dampers", Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Advances in Structural Dynamics (ASD2000) (J.M. Ko and Y.L. Xueds.), Hong Kong, II, 1373-1380.
  53. Ni, Y.Q., Liu, H.J. and Ko, J.M. (2002a), "Experimental investigation on seismic response control of adjacentbuildings using semi-active MR dampers", Smart Structures and Materials 2002: Smart Systems for Bridges,Structures, and Highways (S.C. Liu and D.J. Pines eds.), SPIE 4696.
  54. Ni, Y.Q., Chen, Y., Ko, J.M. and Cao, D.Q. (2002b), "Neuro-control of cable vibration using semi-activemagneto-rheological dampers", Eng. Struct., 24, 295-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00096-7
  55. Ni, Y.Q., Chen, Y., Ko, J.M. and Zheng, G. (2002c), "Optimal voltage/current input to ER/MR dampers formulti-switch control of stay cable vibration", Proc. of the 3rd World Conf. Structural Control, Como,Italy.
  56. Ni, Y.Q., Duan, Y.F., Chen, Z.Q. and Ko, J.M. (2002d), "Damping identification of MR-damped bridge cablesfrom in-situ monitoring under wind-rain-excited conditions", Smart Structures and Materials 2002: SmartSystems for Bridges, Structures, and Highways, S.-C. Liu and D.J. Pines (eds.), SPIE 4696.
  57. Ni, Y.Q., Ying Z.G., Wang, J.Y., Ko, J.M. and Spencer, Jr., B.F. (2003), "Semi-active control of randomly windexcitedtall building structures using MR-TLCDs", accepted to Proc. of the 5th Int. Conf. on StochasticStructural Dynamics, Hangzhou, China.
  58. Oh, J.W., Roschke, P.N., Lin, P.Y., Carlson, J.D. and Sunakoda, K. (2002), "Neuro-fuzzy modeling of a 30-tonmagnetorheological damper", Proc. of the 2nd Int. Sym. Advances in Structural Engineering and Mechanics,Busan, Korea, CD-ROM.
  59. Qu, W.L. and Xu, Y.L. (2001), "Semi-active control of seismic response of tall buildings with podium structureusing ER/MR dampers", The Structural Design of Tall Buildings, 10, 179-192. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.177
  60. Qu, W.L., Xu, Y.L. and Lv, M.Y. (2002), "Seismic response control of large-span machinery building on top ofship lift towers using ER/MR moment controllers", Eng. Struct., 24, 517-527. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00118-3
  61. Rabinow, J. (1948), "The magnetic fluid clutch", AIEE Transaction, 67, 1308-1315.
  62. Ramallo, J.C., Johnson, E.A., Spencer, Jr., B.F. and Sain, M.K. (2000), "'Smart' base isolation systems", Proc. ofthe Advanced Technology in Structural Engineering, Structures Congress, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA,CD-ROM.
  63. Ramallo, J.C., Johnson, E.A. and Spencer, Jr., B.F. (2002), ""Smart" base isolation systems", J. Eng. Mech.,ASCE, 128(10), 1088-1099. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:10(1088)
  64. Ribakov, Y. and Gluck, J. (2002a), "Selective controlled base isolation system with magnetorheologicaldampers", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31, 1301-1324. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.164
  65. Ribakov, Y. and Gluck, J. (2002b), "Selective combined control stiffness and magneto-rheological dampingsystem in nonlinear multistory structures", The Structural Design of Tall Buildings, 11, 171-195. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.191
  66. Ruangrassamee, A. and Kawashima, K. (2001), "Semi-active control of bridges by using MR dampers", Proc. ofthe US-Japan Workshop on Smart Structures for Improved Seismic Performance in Urban Region, Seattle,Washington, USA, 199-212.
  67. Ruangrassamee, A., Jung, H.-J., Kawashima, K. and Spencer, Jr., B.F. (2001), "Semi-active control of anonlinear coupled bridge system by the clipped optimal control algorithm", Proc. of the US-JapanWorkshop on Smart Structures for Improved Seismic Performance in Urban Region, Seattle, Washington,USA, 183-198.
  68. Sahasrabudhe, S. and Nagarajaiah, S. (2001), "Semiactive control of sliding isolated buildings with MRdampers", Proc. of 2001 Mechanics and Materials Conf., San Diego, California, USA.
  69. Schurter, K. and Roschke, P.N. (2000), "Fuzzy modeling of a magnetorheological damper using ANFIS", Proc.of the IEEE Fuzzy 2000 Conf., San Antonio, Texas, USA.
  70. Schurter, K. and Roschke, P.N. (2001a), "Neuro-fuzzy control of structures using acceleration feedback", SmartMaterials and Structures, 10, 770-779. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/10/4/322
  71. Schurter, K. and Roschke, P.N. (2001b), "Neuro-fuzzy control of structures using magnetorheological dampers",Proc. of the 2001 American Control Conf. Washington, D.C., USA.
  72. Soong, T.T. and Spencer Jr., B.F. (2002), "Supplemental energy dissipation: state-of-the-art and state-of-thepractice",Eng. Struct., 24, 243-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00092-X
  73. Spencer Jr., B.F. and Sain, M.K. (1997) "Controlling buildings: a new frontier in feedback", IEEE ControlSystems Magazine: Special Issue on Emerging Technologies (Tariq Samad, Guest Ed.), 17(6), 19-35. https://doi.org/10.1109/37.642972
  74. Spencer Jr., B.F. and Nagarajaiah, S. (2003) "State of the art of structural control", J. Struct. Control, ASCE,129(7), 845-856.
  75. Spencer Jr., B.F., Dyke, S.J., Sain, M.K. and Carlson, J.D. (1997), "Phenomenological model of amagnetorheological damper", J. Eng. Mech., ASCE, 123, 230-238. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:3(230)
  76. Stanway, R., Sproston, J.L. and Stevens, N.G. (1985), "Non-linear identification of an electro-rheologicalvibration damper", IFAC Identification and System Parameter Estimation, 195-200.
  77. Stanway, R., Sproston, J.L. and Stevens, N.G. (1987), "Non-linear identification of an electro-rheologicalvibration damper", J. of Electrostatics, 20, 167-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3886(87)90056-8
  78. Stengel, R.F. (1986), Stochastic Optimal Control: Theory and Application, John Wiley & Sons, New York,NY.
  79. Subramanian, R.S., Reinhorn, A.M., Nagarajaiah, S. and Ryley, M.A. (1996), "Hybrid control of structures usingfuzzy logic", Microcomput. Civ. Eng., 11, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.1996.tb00305.x
  80. Symans, M.D. and Constantinou, M.C. (1999), "Semi-active control systems for seismic protection of structures:a state-of-the-art review", Eng. Struct., 21, 469-487. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00225-3
  81. Utkin, V.I. (1992), Sliding Modes in Control Optimization, Springer, New York, NY.
  82. Vavreck, A.N. (2002), "Single-stage magnetorheological damper parameter estimation", Smart Materials andStructures, 11, 596-598. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/11/4/316
  83. Wang, D.-H. and Liao, W.-H. (2001), "Neural network modeling and controllers for magnetorheological fluiddampers", Proc. of the 2001 IEEE Int. Fuzzy Conf. 1323-1326.
  84. Wang, X. and Gordaninejad, F. (2001), "Lyapunov-based control of a bridge using magneto-rheological fluiddampers", Proc. of the 8th Int. Conf. on ER/MR Fluids.
  85. Wang, X. and Gordaninejad, F. (2002), "Lyapunov-based control of a bridge using magneto-rheological fluiddampers", J. Intelligent Material System and Structures, 13(7), 415-419. https://doi.org/10.1106/104538902025939
  86. Wang, J.Y., Ni, Y.Q., Ko, J.M. and Spencer, Jr., B.F. (2002), "Semi-active TLCDs using magneto-rheologicalfluids for vibration mitigation of tall buildings", Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Advances in Building Tech., HongKong.
  87. Wen, Y. (1976), "Method for random vibration of hysteretic systems", J. Eng. Mech. Div., 102, 249-263.
  88. Weiss, K.D., Carlson, J.D. and Nixon, D.A. (1994), "Viscoelastic properties of magneto- and electro-rheologicalfluids", J. Intelligent Material System and Structures, 5, 772. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X9400500607
  89. Winslow, W.M. (1949), "Induced vibration of suspensions", J. of Applied Physics, 20, 1137-1140. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1698285
  90. Xu, Y.L., Qu, W.L. and Ko, J.M. (2000), "Seismic response control of frame structures usingmagnetorheological/electrorheological dampers", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 29, 557-575. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(200005)29:5<557::AID-EQE922>3.0.CO;2-X
  91. Xu, Z.-D., Shen, Y.P. and Guo, Y.-Q. (2003), "Semi-active control of structures incorporated withmagnetorheological dampers using neural networks", Smart Materials and Structures, 12, 80-87. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/12/1/309
  92. Yang, G. (2001), "Large-scale magnetorheological fluid damper for vibration mitigation: modeling, testing andcontrol", Ph.D dissertation, University of Notre Dame, Indiana, USA.
  93. Yang, G., Jung, H.-J. and Spencer, Jr., B.F. (2001), "Dynamic modeling of full-scale MR dampers for civilengineering applications", Proc. of the US-Japan Workshop on Smart Structures for Improved SeismicPerformance in Urban Region, Seattle, Washington, USA, 213-224.
  94. Yang, G., Spencer, Jr., B.F., Carlson, J.D. and Sain, M.K. (2002), "Large-scale MR fluid dampers: modeling anddynamic performance considerations", Eng. Struct., 24, 309-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00097-9
  95. Yi, F., Dyke, S.J., Frech, S. and Carlson, J.D. (1998), "Investigation of magnetorheological dampers forearthquake hazard mitigation", Proc. of the 2nd World Conf. Structural Control, Kyoto, Japan, 1, 349-358.
  96. Yi, F., Dyke, S.J., Caicedo, J.M. and Carlson, J.D. (2001), "Experimental verification of multi-input seismiccontrol strategies for smart dampers", J. Eng. Mech., ASCE, 127(11), 1152-1164. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2001)127:11(1152)
  97. Ying Z.G., Ni, Y.Q. and Ko, J.M. (2002a), "Non-clipping optimal control of randomly excited nonlinear systemsusing semi-active ER/MR dampers", Smart Structures and Materials 2002: Smart Systems for Bridges,Structures, and Highways (S.C. Liu and D.J. Pines eds.), SPIE 4696.
  98. Ying, Z.G., Ni, Y.Q. and Ko, J.M. (2002b), "Analysis and control of dynamic stability of bridge stay cablesinduced by parametrically excited oscillation", Research Report, Department of Civil and StructuralEngineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
  99. Yoshida, O., Dyke, S.J., Giacosa, L.M. and Truman, K.Z. (2002), "Torsional response control of asymmetricbuildings using smart dampers", Proc. of the 15th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conf., New York, NY, USA,CD-ROM.
  100. Yoshioka, H., Ramallo, J.C. and Spencer, Jr., B.F. (2002), ""Smart" base isolation strategies employingmagnetorheological dampers", J. Eng. Mech., ASCE, 128(5), 540-551. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:5(540)
  101. Zhang, J. and Roschke, P.N. (1998), "Neural network simulation of magnetorheological damper behavior", Proc.of the Int. Conf. on Vibration Engineering '98, Dalian, China.
  102. Zhang, J. and Roschke, P.N. (1999), "Active control of a tall structure excited by wind", J. Wind Engineeringand Industrial Aerodynamics, 83, 209-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(99)00073-2
  103. Zhou, L. and Chang, C.C. (2000a), "A recurrent neural network emulator for the inverse dynamics of an MRdamper", Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Advances in Structural Dynamics (ASD2000) (J.M. Ko and Y.L. Xu eds.),Hong Kong, 365-372.
  104. Zhou, L. and Chang, C.C. (2000b), "Adaptive fuzzy control for a structure-MR damper system", Smart Systemsfor Bridges, Structures, and Highways, SPIE's 7th Annual Int. Symp. on Smart Structures and Materials,Newport Beach, California, USA.
  105. Zhou, L., Chang, C.C. and Spencer, Jr., B.F. (2002), "Intelligent technology-based control of motion andvibration using MR dampers", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 1(1), 100-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-002-0013-1

Cited by

  1. Modeling and Identification of a Small-scale Magnetorheological Damper vol.20, pp.7, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X08098440
  2. Magnetorheological fluid dampers: a review of parametric modelling vol.20, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/20/2/023001
  3. Feasibility Test of Adaptive Passive Control System Using MR Fluid Damper with Electromagnetic Induction Part vol.136, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2010)136:2(254)
  4. Experimental and analytical studies on stochastic seismic response control of structures with MR dampers vol.5, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.5.4.395
  5. Characterization and modeling of a self-sensing MR damper under harmonic loading vol.15, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2015.15.4.1103
  6. Hybrid base-isolation with magnetorheological damper and fuzzy control vol.14, pp.3, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.163
  7. Advancement in energy harvesting magneto-rheological fluid damper: A review vol.28, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13367-016-0035-2
  8. Adaptive Control to Mitigate Damage Impact on Structural Response vol.21, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X10361993
  9. Performance evaluation of an MR damper in building structures considering soil-structure interaction effects vol.18, pp.1, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.430
  10. An Experimental Design of Bypass Magneto-Rheological (MR) damper vol.260, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/260/1/012021
  11. Fuzzy Optimal Control of Uncertain Dynamic Characteristics in Tall Buildings Subjected to Seismic Excitation vol.14, pp.12, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546308091206
  12. Optimal semi-active control of seismically excited MR-equipped nonlinear buildings using FLC and multi-objective NSGAII algorithms considering ground excitations vol.6, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-016-0174-7
  13. Active and Semi-active Adaptive Control for Undamaged and Damaged Building Structures Under Seismic Load vol.27, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2011.00719.x
  14. Experimental investigation of the seismic control of a nonlinear soil-structure system using MR dampers vol.20, pp.8, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/20/8/085026
  15. WPT-based modal control on distributed structures with MRF-04K damper vol.17, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-011-1640-2
  16. Experimental Investigations of Stochastic Control of Randomly Base-Excited Structures vol.15, pp.11, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.15.11.1963
  17. Semi-active suspension systems for railway vehicles using magnetorheological dampers. Part I: system integration and modelling vol.47, pp.11, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1080/00423110802538328
  18. Experimental analysis of a semi-actively controlled steel building vol.19, pp.6, 2005, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2005.19.6.721
  19. Magnetorheological Damper Working in Squeeze Mode vol.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/410158
  20. Development of a linear damper working with magnetorheological shear thickening fluids vol.26, pp.14, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X15577653
  21. Magnetorheological fluid dampers: A review on structure design and analysis vol.23, pp.8, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X12436735
  22. Semi-active control of seismic response of a building using MR fluid-based tuned mass damper vol.16, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2015.16.5.807
  23. Optimal design of control valves in magnetorheological fluid dampers using a nondimensional analytical method vol.24, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X12461721
  24. Experimental study and modeling of a novel magnetorheological elastomer isolator vol.22, pp.11, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/22/11/117001
  25. Identification of a magnetorheological damper: Theory and experiments vol.41, pp.2, 2008, https://doi.org/10.3182/20080706-5-KR-1001.01331
  26. Cable vibration control with a semiactive MR damper-numerical simulation and experimental verification vol.34, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2010.34.5.611
  27. Shaking table testing of a steel frame structure equipped with semi-active MR dampers: comparison of control algorithms vol.15, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2015.15.4.963
  28. Implementation of a closed-loop structural control system using wireless sensor networks vol.15, pp.4, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.214
  29. Magneto-rheological tuned liquid column dampers (MR-TLCDs) for vibration mitigation of tall buildings: modelling and analysis of open-loop control vol.83, pp.25-26, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.03.011
  30. A magnetorheological damper with an integrated self-powered displacement sensor vol.22, pp.7, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/22/7/075001
  31. Experimental Evaluation of a ‘Self-Sensing’ Capability of an Electromagnetic Induction System Designed for MR Dampers vol.21, pp.8, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X10367837
  32. Vibration Control of a Wind-Excited Benchmark Tall Building with Complex Lateral-Torsional Modes of Vibration vol.10, pp.3, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1260/136943307781422208
  33. State of the art of control schemes for smart systems featuring magneto-rheological materials vol.25, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/25/4/043001
  34. Simplified inverse dynamics models for MR fluid dampers vol.28, pp.3, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.06.013
  35. Experimental study of a self-powered and sensing MR-damper-based vibration control system vol.20, pp.10, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/20/10/105007
  36. Research and Application of Vibration Control for Coupled Structures System vol.278-280, pp.1662-7482, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.278-280.68
  37. Mechanical behavior of magnetorheological dampers after long-term operation in a cable vibration control system pp.15452255, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2280
  38. 지진특성에 따른 MR감쇠기가 설치된 단자유도 구조물의 등가감쇠비 vol.18, pp.1, 2004, https://doi.org/10.5050/ksnvn.2008.18.1.087
  39. A feasibility study on smart base isolation systems using magneto-rheological elastomers vol.32, pp.6, 2009, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2009.32.6.755
  40. Vibration control of a time-varying modal-parameter footbridge: study of semi-active implementable strategies vol.20, pp.5, 2004, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2017.20.5.525
  41. A Review on Structural Development of Magnetorheological Fluid Damper vol.2019, pp.None, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1498962
  42. Modelling Magnetorheological Dampers in Preyield and Postyield Regions vol.2019, pp.None, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5636053
  43. Control-oriented model for the dynamic response of a damped cable vol.442, pp.None, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2018.10.036
  44. Nonlinear optimal control for reducing vibrations in civil structures using smart devices vol.23, pp.3, 2004, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2019.23.3.307
  45. Experimental testing and modelling of a rotary variable stiffness and damping shock absorber using magnetorheological technology vol.30, pp.10, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389x19835955
  46. Design formulas for vibration control of taut cables using passive MR dampers vol.23, pp.6, 2004, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2019.23.6.521
  47. Development of a full-scale magnetorheological damper model for open-loop cable vibration control vol.23, pp.6, 2004, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2019.23.6.553
  48. An Intelligent Artificial Neural Network Modeling of a Magnetorheological Elastomer Isolator vol.12, pp.9, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/a12090195
  49. Modeling the Response of Magnetorheological Fluid Dampers under Seismic Conditions vol.9, pp.19, 2004, https://doi.org/10.3390/app9194189
  50. Magnetorheological valves based on Herschel–Bulkley fluid model: modelling, magnetostatic analysis and geometric optimization vol.28, pp.11, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665x/ab421a
  51. Optimal Control for Footbridges’ Vibration Reduction Based on Semiactive Control Through Magnetorheological Dampers vol.19, pp.9, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219455419501104
  52. Simple adaptive control to attenuate bridge’s seismic responses considering parametric variations vol.23, pp.1, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433219866293
  53. Genetic algorithm-based integrated optimization of active control systems for civil structures subjected to random seismic excitations vol.52, pp.10, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215x.2019.1677632
  54. Modeling and Evaluation of Magnetorheological Dampers with Fluid Leakage for Cable Vibration Control vol.26, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001666
  55. Semi-Active System of Vehicle Vibration Damping vol.11, pp.10, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11104577
  56. Damping enhancement of the inerter on the viscous damper in mitigating cable vibrations vol.28, pp.1, 2004, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2021.28.1.089
  57. Review of Magnetorheological Damping Systems on a Seismic Building vol.11, pp.19, 2004, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11199339