한국지구과학회지 (Journal of the Korean earth science society)

  • 제25권5호
  • /
  • Pages.327-335
  • /
  • 2004
  • /
  • 1225-6692(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-4518(eISSN)
한국지구과학회 (The Korean Earth Science Society)
권호 표지

지구과학 문제중심학습에서 협동기술 훈련의 효과

Effect of Cooperative Skill Training on Problem Based Learning for Science Class

  • 발행 : 2004.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 초등학교 과학과 문제중심학습에서 협동기술 훈련의 효과를 밝히기 위하여 통제집단, 문제중심학습 집단, 협동기술 훈련을 한 문제중심학습 집단의 학습능력 수준에 따라 과학 성취도와 자아존중감을 조사하였다. 본 연구의 결과, 학습능력이 높은 학습자는 협동기술 훈련에 무관하게 문제중심학습이 전통적 수업보다 효과적인 것으로 나타났다. 학습능력이 중간인 학습자와 낮은 학습자는 협동기술 훈련을 한 경우, 전통적 수업 집단보다 과학 성취도가 높게 나타났다. 이로써 협동기술 훈련이 학습능력이 중간 이하인 학습자에게서 발생하는 무임승객효과를 줄이고 소집단활동의 협력적인 상호작용에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 밝혀졌다. 자아존중감은 문제중심학습 집단이 통제 집단에 비해 유의미하게 높게 나타났고 학습능력에 따른 상호작용 효과는 없었다.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of cooperative skill training on problem based learning for elementary school science class. Two experiment groups were involved, in which problem based learning model was used and control group, in which traditional instruction was employed. One of experiment groups was trained in cooperative skills before the instruction. The results demonstrated a significant main effect in the scores of achievement and a significant interaction effect between the instructional strategies and learning ability level. The performance of high-level students in the two experimental groups was higher than that of control group. However, the performance of medium and low-level students trained with cooperative skills training was higher than that of students without cooperative skills training. A significant main effect was also found in self-esteem, but there was no significant interaction between instructional strategies and learning ability. Therefore, this study suggests that cooperative skills training is of great importance for minimizing the free-rider effect and increasing collaborative interaction in cooperative learning.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김광휘, 변영계, 1999, 협동학습의 이론과 실제. 서울, 학지사, 4-25 p
  2. 임희준, 노태희, 2001, 이질적으로 구성된 소집단 협동학습에서의 언어적 상호작용. 한국과학교육학회지, 21 (4), 668-676
  3. 박수경, 2004, 환경단원 수업을 위한 문제중심학습 설계 및 적용. 한국지구과학회지, 25 (4), 205-213
  4. 송인섭, 1989, 인간심리와 자아개념. 양서원, 93-105 p. 강석진, 한수진, 노태희, 2002, 과학 개념 학습에서 협동적 소집단 토론의 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 22 (1), 93-101
  5. 강석진, 한수진, 노태희, 2002, 과학 개념 학습에서 협동적 소집단 토론의 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 22 (1), 93-101
  6. 우옥희, 2000, 문제중심학습이 학습자의 메타인지 수준에 따라 문제해결과정에 미치는 효과. 한국교원대학교 석사학위논문, 180 p
  7. 정진우, 전선례, 장명덕, 2004, 대기와 불의 순환 개념변화에 대한 협동학습의 효과. 한국지구과학회지, 25 (2), 63-73
  8. Barrows, H.S., 1994, Problem based learning applied to medical education. Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, 145 p
  9. Cohen, E.G., 1987, Talking and work together: Status interaction and learning. In Peterson, P., Wilkinson, L.c., and Hallinan, M (eds.), Advances in group process, Greenwich, CN: JAI, 57 p
  10. Cohen, E.G., 1994, Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1-35 https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543064001001
  11. Johnson, D.W. and Johnson, R.T., 1974, Instructional goal structure: Cooperative, competitive of individualistic. Review of Educational Research, 44, 213-221 https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543044002213
  12. Kagan, S., 1992, Cooperative learning: Resources for teachers. San Juan Capistrano, CA: Resources for Teachers, 21-32 p
  13. Kagan, M and Kagan, S., 1993, Playing with element: Advanced work in the structural approach. Cooperative Learning, 13 (1), 6-7
  14. Lazarowitz, B.J.H. and Hertz-Lazarowitz, R, 1992, Academic achievement and social gains of differing status students learning science in cooperative groups. Cooperative Learning, 13 (1), 17-20
  15. Lew, M., Mesch, D., Johnson, D.W., and Johnson, R.T. 1986, Positive interdependence, academic and collaborative skill group contingencies. American Educational Research Journal, 23 (4), 476-488
  16. Sharan, S. and Shachar, C, 1988, Language and learning in the cooperative classroom. NY: Springer, 35-64 p
  17. Slavin, R.E., 1987, Cooperative learning: Where behavioral and humanistic approaches to classroom motivation meet. Elementary School Journal, 88 (3), 290-337
  18. Slavin, R.E., 1992, When and why does cooperative leaming increase achievement? Theoretical and empirical perspectives. In Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. and Miller, N. (eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups, NY: Cambridge University Press, 72-89 p
  19. Stepien, W. and Gallagher, S., 1993, Problem-based learning: As authentic as it gets. Educational Leadership, 50 (I), 25-28
  20. Torp, L. and Sage, S., 2002, Problems as possibilities: Problem-based learning for K-16 education (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision, 20-29p.
  21. Vygotsky, L.S., 1978, Mind in society: The development of high psychological processes (Cole, M., John-Steiner, v., Scribner, S., and Souberman, E. eds. and trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 37 p
  22. Webb, N.M., 1982a, Group composition, group interaction, and achievement in cooperative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74 (4), 475-484 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.4.475
  23. Webb, N.M., 1982b, Peer interaction, and learning in cooperative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74 (5), 642-655 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.5.642