Evaluation of the Manual Method of Liquid-Based Uterine Cervicovaginal Cytology - By The Manual Method Based on $SurePath^{TM}$ Methodology

자궁경부 액상세포검사의 수기 검사법에 대한 고찰 - $SurePath^{TM}$ 검사법을 준용한 수기 검사법으로 -

  • Park, Jong-Myoung (Department of Cytopathology, Sung-Yoon Reference Laboratory) ;
  • Jang, Jin-Wook (Department of Cytopathology, Sung-Yoon Reference Laboratory) ;
  • Lim, So-Yeo (Department of Cytopathology, Sung-Yoon Reference Laboratory) ;
  • Suh, In-Soo (Department of Pathology, Kyungpook University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Gi (Department of Cytopathology, Sung-Yoon Reference Laboratory)
  • 박종명 (성윤검사센타 세포학부) ;
  • 장진욱 (성윤검사센타 세포학부) ;
  • 임소여 (성윤검사센타 세포학부) ;
  • 서인수 (경북대학교 의과대학 병리학교실) ;
  • 이종기 (성윤검사센타 세포학부)
  • Published : 2004.11.30

Abstract

Liquid-Based Uterine Cervicovaginal Cytology is known to be a sensitive and effective screening method for cervical neoplasm $MonoPrep^{TM},\;ThinPrep^{TM},\;and\;SurePath^{TM}$ methods have been recently used as Liquid-Based Uterine Cervicovaginal Cytology techniques, and the $SurePath^{TM}$ method has been used in Sung-Yoon Reference Laboratory since 2003. The goal of Liquid-Based Uterine Cervicovaginal Cytology is to separate cervical epithelial cells from non-target cells, red blood cells and neutrophils. This report describes a study which evaluated cellularity, stainablilty, and cellular changes of epithelial cels in samples processed using a manual technique as compared to samples processed using $SurePath^{TM}$ automated method. The samples processed by means of a manual technique contained a cellularity of epithelial cells similar to that of the samples processed using the $SurePath^{TM}$ automated method. In addition, we compared variable density gradient reagents, including dextran, dextrose, and sucrose, to $SurePath^{TM}$ gradient media in order to evaluate cell fractionation and cellularity of epithelial cells. 10% dextran of gradient media shows good fractionation. The samples processed with 10% dextran demonstrated sufficient cellularity of epithelial cells and shows the fewest cellular changes. In conclusion, using a manual technique on these samples is easier to read than those results obtained using the $SurePath^{TM}$ automated method.

Keywords

References

  1. Hutchinson ML, Agarwal P, Denault T, Berger B, Cibas ES. A new look at cervical cytology. ThinPrep multicenter trial results. Acta Cytol 1992;36:499-504
  2. Papillo JL, Zarka MA, St. John TL. Evaluation of the ThinPrep Pap test in clinical practice. A seven-month, 16,314-case experience in northern Vermont. Acta Cytol 1998;42:203-8
  3. Austin RM, Ramzy I. Increased detection of epithelial cell abnormalities by liquid-based gynecologic cytology preparations. A review of accumulated data. Acta Cytol 1998;42:178-84 https://doi.org/10.1159/000331543
  4. Vassilakos P, Saurel J, Rondez R. Direct-to-vial use of the AutoCyte PREP liquid-based preparation for cervical-vaginal specimens in three European laboratories. Acta Cytol 1999;43:65-8 https://doi.org/10.1159/000330870
  5. Cengel KA, Day SJ, Davis-Devine S, et al. Effectiveness of the $SurePath^{TM}$ liquid-based Pap test in automatic screening and in detection of HSIL. Diagn Cytopathol 2003; 29: 250-5 https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.10373
  6. Jang J, Kim J, Cho KJ, Khang SK, Nam JH, Gong G. A comparison of AutoCyte PREP with matched conventional smear in crvicovaginal cytology. Korean J Cytopathol 2002; 13: 8-13
  7. Jeon YK, Kim OR, Park KW, Kang SB, Park IA. Liquid-based cytology using $MonoPrep^{TM}$ system in cervicovaginal cytology: Comparative study with conventional Pap smear and histology. Korean J Cytopathol 2004;15:33-9
  8. Lesile R. Rowe C. Marshall J, Benz JS. PREPmate Automated Processor: Comparison of automated and manual methods of liquid-based gynecologic sample preparation, Diagn Cytopathol 2002;27:312-5
  9. Rickwood D, Ford TC, Steensgaard J. Compatibilities and properties of density gradient media. In: Centrifugation. Rickwood D, Ford TC, Steensgaard J. eds. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons, 1994;35-55