한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제24권1호
  • /
  • Pages.90-108
  • /
  • 2004
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지

Preservice Science Teachers' Previous Experience, Beliefs, and Visions of Science Teaching and Learning

  • 발행 : 2004.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study is to understand preservice science teachers' previous experience, beliefs about teaching and learning, and visions of themselves as future teachers. The data were collected from two individual interviews with 7 voluntary students and analyzed qualitatively for category construction. As the results of this study, we presented two cases, which showed that their different views of teaching science are strongly related to their previous experiences as learners and observers in schools, and that there is the apparent consistency between each participant's beliefs about science teaching and learning and their own visions of teaching in a science classroom. Implications for preservice science teacher education related to the results were discussed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kim, Y. & Kim, D. (1989). A study on the improvement of curriculum for the biology teacher education based on status survey. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 9(1), 39-52
  2. Kim, H., Kim, Y., & Park, S. (1994). A status survey on the preservice education of secondary science teachers. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 14(2), 199-213.
  3. Park, Y. (1992).Characteristics of good science teachers and preservice teacher education curriculum perceived by secondary teachers. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 12(1), 103-118
  4. Lee, H. (1989). Survey and improvement model of the program for secondary science teacher preparation. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 9(1), 1-17
  5. Hong, S., Woo, J., & Jung, J. (1995). An analysis of preceding-research on science-teacher and science-teacher education in Korea and America. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 15(3), 241-249
  6. Barnes, D. (1992). The significance of teachers' frames for teaching. In T. Russell & H. Munby (Eds.), Teachers and teaching: From classroom to reflection(pp. 9-32). New York: Falmer Press
  7. Barth, R. (1986). On sheep and goats and school reform. Kappan, 25(4), 471-492
  8. Bell, B. & Gilbert, J. (1996). Teacher development. PA: Falmer press
  9. Brickhouse, N. (1990). Teachers' beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 15(4), 13-18
  10. Brookhart, S., & Freeman, D. (1992). Characteristics of entering teacher candidates. Review of Educational Research, 62, 37-60 https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062001037
  11. Bryan, L., & Abell, S. (1999). Development of professional knowledge in learning to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 121-139 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199902)36:2<121::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-U
  12. Bybee, R. (1993). Reforming science educationsocial perspectives and personal reflections. New York: Teachers College Press
  13. Carey, S. (1986). Cognitive science and science education. American Psychologies, 1,1123-1130
  14. Cobern, W., & Loving, C. (2002). Investigation of preservice elementary teachers' thinking about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 1016-1031 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10052
  15. Dana, T., McLoughlin, A., & Freeman, T. (1998, April). Creating dissonance in prospective teachers' conceptions of teaching and learning science. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Diego
  16. Eisenhart, M., Shrum, J., Harding, J., & Cuthbert, A. (1988). Teacher beliefs: Definitions, findings and directions. Educational Policy, 2, 51-70 https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904888002001004
  17. Ellen, R. F. (1984). Enthnographic research: A guide to general conduct. New York: Academic Press
  18. Feldman, A. (2002). Multiple perspectives for the study of teaching: knowledge, reason, understanding, and being. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 1032-1055 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10051
  19. Green, T. (1971). The activeties of teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill
  20. Hamilton, M. L. (1993). Think you can: The influence of culture on beliefs. In C. Day, J. Calderhead. & P. Denicolo (Eds.), Research on teacher thinking: Understanding professional development (pp. 87-97).The Falmer Press: London, Washington, D. C.
  21. Hewson, P. (1981). A conceptual change approach to learning science. European Journal of Science Education, 3, 383-396 https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528810304004
  22. Hewson, P. W. & Hewson, M. G. A'B. (1989). Analysis and use of a task for identifying conceprions of teaching science. Journal of Education for Teaching, 15(3), 191-209 https://doi.org/10.1080/0260747890150302
  23. Hewson, P., Tabachnick, B. R., Zeichner, K. M., Blomker, K. B., Meyer, H., Lemberger, J., Marion, R., Park, H., Toolin, R. (1999). Educating Prospective teachers of biology: Introduction and research methods. Science Education, 83, 247-273 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199905)83:3<247::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-C
  24. Levitt, K. (2001). An analysis of elementary teachers' beliefs regarding the teaching and learning of science. Science Education, 86, 1-22
  25. Lortie, D. (2002). Schoolteacher: A sociological study (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
  26. Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P., Love, N., & Stiles, K. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. California: Corwin Press, INC
  27. Ministry of Education (2002). Teacher educational plans in 2002
  28. Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317-328 https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027870190403
  29. Osborne, J. F. (1996). Beyond constructivism. Science Education, 80(1), 53-82 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199601)80:1<53::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-1
  30. Osbrone, M. (1998). Teacher as knower and learner: reflections on situated knowledge in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 427-439 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199804)35:4<427::AID-TEA12>3.0.CO;2-6
  31. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications
  32. Peterson, R. & Treagust, D. (1998). Learning to teach primary science through problem-based learning. Science Education, 82, 215-237 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199804)82:2<215::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-H
  33. Phillips, D. C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24, 5-12
  34. Resnick, L. (1989). Introduction. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 1-24). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  35. Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning in teach. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research in mathematics education (pp. 102-119). New York: Macmillan
  36. Staver, J. R. (1998). Constructivism: Sound theory for explicating the practice of science and science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(5), 501-520 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199805)35:5<501::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-T
  37. Shapiro, B. (1994). What children bring to lightA constructivist perspective on children’ s learning in science. New York: Teacher's College Press
  38. Tobin, K. (1993). Constructivist perspectives on teacher learning. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
  39. Tobin, K., Tippins, D., & Gallard, A. J., (1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning. New York: MacMillan
  40. von Glasersfeld, E. (1993). Questions and answers about radical constructivism. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 23-28). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
  41. Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 45-69 https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90018-3