한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제24권5호
  • /
  • Pages.843-850
  • /
  • 2004
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지

과제 지향 보상을 활용한 협동학습에서 소집단 활동 점검 과정이 중학교 과학 수업에 미치는 효과

The Effect of Group Processing on Science Instruction of Middle School in Cooperative Learning using Task-oriented Reward

  • 발행 : 2004.10.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구에서는 과제 지향 보상 협동학습에서 소집단 활동 점검 과정이 학업 성취도, 학습 동기, 과학 수업에 대한 태도에 미치는 영향에 대하여 조사하였다. 서울에 있는 중학교 2학년 58명을 처치 집단과 비교 집단으로 무선 할당한 후, "혼합물의 분리" 단원에 대하여 8차시 동안 수업하였다. 처치 집단에는 소집단 활동 점검 과정이 있는 과제 지향 보상 협동학습(GCL)을 실시하였고, 비교 집단에는 소집단 활동 점검 과정이 없는 과제 지향 보상 협동 학습(CL)을 실시하였다. 연구 결과 학업 성취도와 과학 수업에 대한 태도에서 수업 처치와 사전 성취 수준 사이에 상호작용 효과가 있었다. 상위 수준 학생들은 GCL 집단에서 학업 성취도와 태도에서 더 높은 점수를 받았으며, 하위 수준 학생들은 CL 집단에서 성취도와 태도에서 더 높은 점수를 나타냈다.

This study investigated the effects of group processing in cooperative learning using task-oriented reward on students' science achievement, science learning motivation, and attitude toward science instruction. Eighth graders (N=58) selected from a middle school in Seoul, were randomly assigned to either the treatment or comparison group, and taught on the 'Separation of Mixture' over 8 class hours. The treatment group received cooperative learning using task-oriented reward containing group processing (GCL), while the comparison group received cooperative learning using task-oriented reward without group processing (CL). Significant interactions between the instruction and prior achievement level were found in the achievement and the attitude toward science instruction. High-level students in the GCL group performed better than those in the CL group, while low-level students in the CL group performed better than their counterparts.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 노태희, 박수연, 임희준, 차정호.(1998). 협동학습 전략에서 소집단 구성 방법의 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 18(1), 61-70
  2. 노태희, 윤선애, 한재영, 이지영(2003). 보상 제공 방법에 따른 협동학습의 효과. 대한학회지, 47(6), 625-632
  3. 임희준(1998). 과학 수업에서의 협동학습: 교수 효과와 소집단의 언어적 상호작용. 서울대학교 박사 학위 논문
  4. 정문성, 김동일(1998). 열린 교육을 위한 협동학습의 이론과 실제. 형설출판사: 서울
  5. Archer-Kath, J., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T.(1994). Individual versus group feedback in cooperative groups. The Journal of Social Psychology, 134(5), 681-694 https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1994.9922999
  6. Dishon, D. & Wilson-O'Leary, P.(1984). A guidebook for cooperative learning: A technique for creating more effective schools. Holmes Beach, FL: Learning
  7. Fraser, B. J.(1981). Test of science-related attitudes: handbook. Hawthorn: The Australian Council for Educational Research
  8. Geer, C. H.(1993). The effects of cooperative learning on different ability level student's perceptions of the middle school classroom environment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Atlanta, GA, April, 1993
  9. Goodwin, M.(1999). Cooperative Learning and social skills: what skills to teach and how to teach them. Intervention in School and Clinic, 35(1),29-33 https://doi.org/10.1177/105345129903500105
  10. Hooper, S.(1992). Cooperative learning and computerbased instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(3), 21-23 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296840
  11. Johnson, D. & Johnson, R.(1990). Social skills for successful group work. Educational Leadership, December 1989/January 1990, 29-33
  12. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R T., Stanne, M. B., & Garibaldi, A.(1990). Impact of group processing on achievement in cooperative groups. The Journal of Social Psychology, 130(4), 507-516 https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1990.9924613
  13. Kagan(1994). Cooperative Learning. San Clementre: Kagan Cooperative Learning
  14. Keller, J. M. & Subhiyah, R.(1993). Course Interest Survey. Florida State University
  15. Kluge, D.(1999) A brief introduction to cooperative learning. In Kluge, D., McGuire, S., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (Eds.), Cooperative Learning. Tokyo: Japan Association for Language Teaching (JALT)
  16. Rottier, J., & Ogan, B. J.(1991). Cooperative learning in middle level schools. Washington, D.C.: NEA Professional Library, National Education Association
  17. Sharan, S. & Shaulov, A.(1990). Cooperative learning, motivation to learn, and academic achievement. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Cooperative learning: Theory and research (pp 173-202). New York, NY: Praeger
  18. Slavin, R E.(1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Education Psychology, 21,43-46 https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0004
  19. Walters, L. S.(2000). Putting cooperative Learning to the test, Harvard Education Letter, 16(3). Retrieved December 12, 2001
  20. Watson, S. B. & Marshal, J. E.(1995). Effects of cooperative incentives and heterogeneous arrangement on achievement and interaction of cooperative learning groups in a college life science course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(3), 291-299 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320308
  21. Yager, S., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R T.(1985). Oral discussion, group-to-individual transfer, and achievement in cooperative learning groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(1), 60-66 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.77.1.60