Polscope-Assisted Enucleation for Nuclear Transfer in Mice

  • Won Ji Young (Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, Dankook University) ;
  • Kang Jee Hyun (Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, Dankook University) ;
  • Shim Hosup (Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, Dankook University)
  • Published : 2004.12.01

Abstract

Efficiency of somatic cell nuclear transfer was investigated in mice. First, oocyte activation was induced by SrCl₂, and the rate of development was compared with embryos from normal fertilization. Although more than one half of SrCl₂-treated oocytes developed to blastocysts (146/262, 55.7%), the rate of blastocyst formation was significantly lower than normal fertilization controls (59/79, 74.6%). Second, enucleation of oocytes was performed using Polscope that enables non-invasive visualization of metaphase spindles. Such approach could not only avoid damage of oocytes during an exposure to UV light often employed in conventional enucleation procedures, but could also assure the removal of nuclei from all oocytes operated because of monitoring the location of spindles during an entire process of enucleation. Morphologically normal blastocysts were obtained from the transfer of cumulus cell nuclei into enucleated oocytes. However, the rate of development into the blastocyst stage was still low (4/93, 4.3%). This reflects that the nuclear transfer procedure used in this study was not sufficiently optimized, and other factors may also impact greatly the efficiency of nuclear transfer. Including an induction of oocyte activation and method of enucleation tested in this study, a lot more elements are remained to be optimized to improve the efficiency of somatic cell nuclear transfer in mice.

Keywords

References

  1. Baguisi A, Behboodi E, Melican DT, Pollock JS, Destrempes MM, Cammuso C, Williams JL, Nims SD, Porter CA, Midura P, Palacios MJ, Ayres SL, Denniston RS, Hayes ML, Ziomek CA, Meade HM, Godke RA, Gavin WG, Overstrom EW, Echelard Y (1999): Production of goats by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Nat Biotechnol 17: 456-461 https://doi.org/10.1038/8632
  2. Bos-Mikich A, Swann K, Whittingham DG (1995): Calcium oscillations and protein synthesis inhibition synergistically activate mouse oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 41: 84-90 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080410113
  3. Chung YG, Mann MR, Bartolomei MS (2002): Nuclear cytoplasmic 'tug of war' during cloning: effects of somatic cell nuclei on culture medium preferences of preimplantation cloned mouse embryos. Biol Reprod 66: 1178-1184
  4. Cuthbertson KS, Whittingham DG, Cobbold PH (1981): Free $Ca^{2+}$ increases in exponential phase during mouse oocyte activation. Nature 294: 745-754
  5. Cuthbertson KS (1983): Parthenogenetic activation of mouse oocytes in vitro with ethanol and benzyl alcohol. J Exp Zool 226: 311-314
  6. Hagemann LJ, Hillery-Weinhold FL, Leibfried-Rutledge ML, First NL (1995): Activation of murine oocytes with $Ca^{2+}$ ionophore and cycloheximide. J Exp Zool 271: 57-61 https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402710107
  7. Henery CC, Kaufman MH (1993): The incidence of aneuploidy after single pulse electroactivation of mouse oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 34: 299-307 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080340310
  8. Janssenswillen C, Christiaens F, Camu F, Van Steirteghem A (1997): The effect of propofol on parthenogenetic activation, in vitro fertilization and early development of mouse oocytes. Fertil Steril 67:769-774 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(97)81381-7
  9. Liu L (2000): A reliable, noninvasive technique for spindle imaging and enucleation of mammalian oocytes. Nat Biotechnol 18: 223-225
  10. Nakasaka H, Yamano S, Hinokio K, Nakagawa K, Yoshizawa M, Aono T (2000): Effective activation method with A23187 and purrnycin to produce haploid parthenogenotes from freshly ovulated mouse oocytes. Zygote 8: 203-208
  11. Ogura A, Inoue K, Ogonuki N, Noguchi A, Takano K, Nagano R, Suzuki O, Lee J, Ishino F, Matsuda J (2000): Production of male cloned mice from fresh, cultured, and cryopreserved immature Sertoli cells. Biol Reprod 62: 1579-1584
  12. Onodera M, Tsunoda Y (1989): Parthenogenetic activation of mouse and rabbit eggs by electric stimulation in vitro. Gamete Res 22: 277-283 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1120220305
  13. Shaw JM, Trounson AO (1989): Parthenogenetic activation of unfertilized mouse oocytes by exposure to 1,2-propanol is influenced by temperature, oocyte age, and cumulus removal. Gamete Res 24: 269-279 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1120240304
  14. Siracusa G, Whittingham DG, Molinaro M, Vivarelli E (1978): Parthenogenetic activation of mouse oocytes induced by inhibitors of protein synthesis. J Embryol Exp Morphol 43: 157-166
  15. Wakayama T, Yanagimachi R (1999): Cloning of male mice from adult tail-tip cells. Nature Genet 22: 127-128 https://doi.org/10.1038/9632
  16. Wakayama T, Perry ACF, Zuccotti M, Johnson KR, Yanagimachi R (1998): Full-term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei. Nature 394: 369-374 https://doi.org/10.1038/28615
  17. Wakayama T, Rodriguez I, Perry ACF, Yanagirnachi R, Mombaerts P (1999): Mice cloned from embryonic stern cell. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 14984-14989 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.26.14984
  18. Wakayama T, Tateno H, Mombaerts P, Yanagimachi R (2000a): Nuclear transfer into mouse zygotes. Nat Genet 24: 108-109
  19. Wakayama T, Shinkai Y, Tamashiro KLK, Niida H, Blanchard DC, Blanchard RJ, Ogura A, Tanemura K, Tachibana M, Perry ACF, Colgan DF, Mombaerts P, Yanagimachi R (2000b): Cloning of mice to six generations. Nature 407: 318-319
  20. Willadsen SM (1986): Nuclear transplantation in sheep embryos. Nature 320: 63-65
  21. Wilmut I, Schnieke AE, McWhir J, Kind AJ, Campbell KHS (1997): Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cell. Nature 385: 810-813 https://doi.org/10.1038/385810a0