한국조경학회지 (Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture)

  • 제32권5호
  • /
  • Pages.1-10
  • /
  • 2004
  • /
  • 1225-1755(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-9566(eISSN)
한국조경학회 (The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture)
권호 표지

국립공원 방문의 제한요소 및 타협전략

Constraints and Negotiation Strategies of National Park Visitors

  • 홍성권 (건국대학교 생명환경과학대학 환경과학전공) ;
  • 장호찬 (국립방송통신대학교 사회과학부 관광학과) ;
  • 이석호 (동국대학교 관광대학 관광경영학과) ;
  • 김재현 (건국대학교 생명환경과학대학 환경과학전공)
  • Hong Sung-Kwon (Dept. of Environmental Science, Konkuk University) ;
  • Jang Ho-Chan (Dept. of Tourism, Korea National Open University) ;
  • Lee Seok-Ho (Dept. of Tourism Management, Dongguk University) ;
  • Kim Jae-Hyun (Dept. of Environmental Science, Konkuk University)
  • 발행 : 2004.10.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study applied the leisure constraints and negotiation concept to the travel context, especially for traveling in national parks. More specifically, it tries to identify how constraints and negotiation impact a person's travel behavior. The population of this study is the people who intend to visit the national parks for their summer vacations. The data was collected through the panel study, which surveyed the same set of people before and after their trip. Among 527 samples, 39.7％ traveled what they planned without any changes. 24.7％ did not travel or postponed their trip, and 35.7％ enjoyed their vacation but with changes of destination, time or travel periods. These results support that people may use negotiation strategies to overcome their constraints in a travel context. However, there were no statistically significant differences in the impact of constraints on travel behavior among the three groups. The results also confirm that people have to overcome intra-, inter-, and structural constraints for visiting the national parks. Thus, the findings of the study suggest that the concepts of leisure constraints and negotiation is applicable to the travel contexts. Because of its exploratory characteristics, several limitations and cautions were raised.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 홍성권(1998) 주제공원 이용자의 시장세분화를 위한 '충성도'의 사용가능성 검토. 한국조경학회지 26(1): 1-11
  2. Ankomah. P. K., J. L. Crompton, and D. Baker(1996) Influence of Cognitive Distance in Vacation Choice. Annals of Tourism Research 23(1): 138-150 https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(95)00054-2
  3. Botha, C., J. L. Crompton. and S. Kim(1999). Developing a Revised Competitive Position for Sun/Lost City. South Africa. Journal of Travel Research 37(2): 341-352 https://doi.org/10.1177/004728759903700404
  4. Crawford. D. W., and G. Godbey(1987) Reconceptualizating Barriers to Family Leisure. Leisure Sciences 9: 119-127 https://doi.org/10.1080/01490408709512151
  5. Crawford, D. W.. E. L. Jackson, and G. Godbey(1991). A Hierarchical Model of Leisure Constraints. Leisure Sciences 13: 309-320 https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409109513147
  6. Francken. D. A., and W. F. van Raaij(1981). Satisfaction with Leisuie Time Activities. Journal of Leisure Research 13: 337-352
  7. Henderson. K. A., D. Stalnaker, and G. Tay1or(1988) The Relationship between Barriers to Recreation and Gender-Role Personality Traits for Women. Journal of Leisure Research 20(1): 69-80
  8. Henderson. K. A., L. A. Bedini, L. Hecht, and R. Schuler(1995) Women with Physical Disabilities and the Negotiation of Leisure Constraints. Leisure Studies 14: 17-31 https://doi.org/10.1080/02614369500390021
  9. Hubbard, J., and R. C. Mannell(2001) Testing Competing Models of the Leisure Constraint Negotiation Process in a Corporate Employee Recreation Setting. Leisure Sciences 23(3): 145-163 https://doi.org/10.1080/014904001316896846
  10. Jackson. E. L.(1990) Vahations in the Desire to Begin a Leisure Activity: Evidence of Antecedent Constraints? Journal of Leisure Research 22(1): 55-70
  11. Jackson. E. L., D. W. Crawford. and G. Godbey(1993) Negotiation of Leisure Constraints. Leisure Sciences 15: 1-11 https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409309513182
  12. Jackson, E. L., and M. S. Searle(1985) Recreation Non-Participation and Barriers to Participation: Concepts and Models. Loisir et Societ$\dot{e}$ 8: 693-707 https://doi.org/10.1080/07053436.1985.10715236
  13. Jackson, E. L., and V. C. Rucks(1995) Negotiation of Leisure Constraints by Junior-High and High-School Students: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Leisure Research 27(1): 85-105
  14. Kay. T., and G. Jackson(1991) Leisure Despite Constraint: The Impact of Leisure Constraints on Leisure Participation. Journal of Leisure Research 23: 301-313
  15. Pennington-Gray, L. A., and D. L. Kerstetter(2002) Testing a Constraints Model within the Context of Nature-Based Tourism. Journal of Travel Research 40: 416-423 https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287502040004008
  16. Samdahl, D. M. and N. Jekubovich(1993) Constraints and Constraint Negotiation in Common Daily Living. Paper Presented at the Seventh Canadian Congress on Leisure Research, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg. Manitoba
  17. Shaw, S. M., A. Bonea and J. F. McCabe(1991) Do More Constraints Mean Less Leisure? Examining the Relationship between Constraints and Participation. Journal of Leisure Research 23: 286-300
  18. Tian. S., J. L. Crompton, and P. A. Witt(1996) Integrating Constraints and Benefits to Identify Responsive Target Markets for Museum Attraction. Journal of Travel Research 35(2): 34-45 https://doi.org/10.1177/004728759603500207
  19. Um, S., and J. L. Crompton(1992) The Roles of Perceived Inhibitors and Facilitators in Pleasure Travel Destination Decisions. Journal of Travel Research 30(3): 18-25 https://doi.org/10.1177/004728759203000303
  20. Woodside, A. G., and S. Lysonski(1989) A General Model of Traveler Destination Choice. Journal of Travel Research 27(4): 8-14 https://doi.org/10.1177/004728758902700402
  21. http://www.npa.or.kr