References
- Assouline, S., & Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (2003). Developing mathematical talent: A guide for challenging and educating gifted students. Waco, TX: Prufrock
- Bangel, N., & Moon, S. M. (Eds). (2004). A Teacher's Guide to the Purdue Three-Stage Model. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana Department of Education
- Benbow, C. P., Perkins, S., & Stanley, J. C. (1983). Mathematics taught at a fast pace: A longitudinal evaluation of SMPY's first class. In C. P. Benbow & J. C. Stanley (Eds.), Academic precocity: Aspects of its development (pp.51-78). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
- Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (Eds). (1983). Academic precocity: Aspects of its development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
- Chamberlin, S., & Moon, S. M. (2004). Analysis of interest during and after Model Eliciting Activities: A comparison of gifted and general population students. Unpublished manuscript.
- Feldhusen, J. F. (1980), The three-stage model of course design. Englewood Cliffs, Nj: Educational Technology Publications
- Feldhusen, J. F., & Kolloff, M. B. (1978, Sept/Oct). A three-stage model for gifted education. Gifted Child Today, 1, 39-50
- Feldhusen, J. F., Kolloff, M. B., Cole, S., & Moon, S. M. (1988). A three-stage model for gifted education: 1988 update. Gifted Child Today, 11(1), 63-67
- Feldhusen, J. F., & Kolloff, P. B. (1986). The Purdue Three-Stage Enrichment Model at the Elementary Level. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 153-179). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
- Feldhusen, J. F., & Treffinger, D. J. (1985). Creative thinking and problem solving in gifted education. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt
- Gallagher, S. A. (1997). Problem-based learning: Where did it come from, what does it do, and where is it going. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20(4), 332-362 https://doi.org/10.1177/016235329702000402
- Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1967). Scientific creativity. Science Journal, 3(9), 80-84.
- Hansen, J. B., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1994). Comparison of trained and untrained teachers of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38(3), 115-121 https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629403800304
- Hersberger, J. R. (1994). Computers and the mathematically gifted: Facilitating the development of higher level thinking. In J. B. Hansen & S. M. Hoover(Eds.), Talent development theories and practice (pp. 131-142). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt
- Kolloff, M. B., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1981, May/June). PACE (Program for Academic and Creative Enrichment): An application of the three-stage model. Gifted Child Today, 5, 47-50
- Kolloff, P. B., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1984). The effects of enrichment on self-concept and creative thinking. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28(2), 53-57 https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628402800202
- Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. (2003). Beyond constructivism: A models and modeling perspective on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching. Hillsdale, Nj: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates
- Lesh, R., Hoover, M., Kelly, A., & Post, T. (2000). Principles for developing thought-revealing activities for students and teachers. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), The handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 591-646). Hillsdale, Nj: Lawrence Earlbuam and Associates
- Moon, S. M. (1993). Using the Purdue Three-Stage Model: Developing talent at the secondary level. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 5(2), 31-35
- Moon, S. M. (2003a). Developing personal talent. In F. J. Monks & H. Wagner (Eds.), Development of human potential: Investment into our future. Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the European Council for High Ability (ECHA). Rhodes, October 9-13, 2002 (pp. 11-21). Bad Honnef, Germany: K.H. Bock
- Moon, S. M. (2003b). Personal Talent. High Ability Studies, 14(1), 5-21 https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130304095
- Moon, S. M., Feldhusen, J. F., & Dillon, D. R (1994). Long-term effects of an enrichment program based on the Purdue Three-Stage Model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38(1), 38-48 https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629403800106
- Moon, S. M., Feldhusen, J. F., Powley, S., Nidiffer, L., & Whitman, M. (1993). Secondary applications of the Purdue Three-Stage Model. Gifted Child Today, 16(3), 2-9
- Nidiffer, L. G., & Moon, S. M. (1994). Middle school seminars. Gifted Child Today, 17(2), 24-27, 39-41
- Powley, S. A., & Moon, S. M. (1993). Secondary English theme units: A pragmatic approach. Gifted Child Today, 16(4), 52-61
- Reger, B. (2004). Textbooks for regular science students are not satisfactory for gifted students. Unpublished manuscript
- Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The Enrichment Triad Model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
- Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1986). The enrichment revolving door model: A schoolwide plan for the development of creative productivity. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 216-266). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
- Rovira, N. D. (2004). Advanced Chemistry 4th to 6th. In N. Bangel & S. M. Moon (Eds.) , A teacher's guide to the Purdue Three-Stage Model. Indianapolis:IN
- Schiever, S. W. (1990). A comprehensive approach to teaching thinking. Boston: Allyn and Bacon
- Schiever, S. W., & Maker, C. J. (2003). New directions in enrichment and acceleration. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook on gifted education (pp. 163-173). Boston: Allyn and Bacon
- Schlee, B. (2004). Forensic Science. In N. Bangel & S. M. Moon (Eds.), A Teacher's Guide to the Purdue Three-Stage Model. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana Department of Education
- Sher, B. T. (2003). Adapting Science curricula for high-ability learners. In J. VanTassel-Baska & C. A. Little (Eds.), Content-based curriculum (pp. 191-218). Waco, TX: Prufrock
- Stanley, J. C. (1996). In the Beginning: The Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth. In C. P. Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds.) , Intellectual Talent: Psychometric and Social Issues (pp. 225-235). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins
- Van Tassel-Baska, J., & Little, C. A. (Eds.). (2003). Content-based curriculum for high-ability learners. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press
- VanTassel-Baska, J. (1994). Comprehensive Curriculum for Gifted Learners (2nd ed. ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon
- VanTassel-Baska, J. (1998). Comprehensive Curriculum for Gifted Learners (2nd ed. ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon
- Wheatley, G. H. (1994). Talent development theory and practice. In J. B. Hansen& S. M. Hoover (Eds.) , Talent development theories and practice (pp. 143-152). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt
- Whitman, M. W., & Moon, S. M. (1993). Bridge Building: Conducting scientific research redefines the roles of teacher and student. Gifted Child Today, 16(5), 47-50
- Woermbke, M. B. (2004). Mathematics. In N. Bangel & S. M. Moon (Eds.), A teacher's guide to the Purdue Three-Stage Model. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana Department of Education
- Wood, B. K., & Moon, S. M. (2004). A follow-up study of students eligible for a gifted math program. Unpublished manuscript