품질경영학회지 (Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management)

  • 제32권4호
  • /
  • Pages.196-207
  • /
  • 2004
  • /
  • 1229-1889(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-9005(eISSN)
한국품질경영학회 (Korean Society for Quality Management)
권호 표지

비즈니스 성과극대화를 위한 TDR 몰입도 향상

The Immersing Improvement of TDR for the Greatest Results in Business

  • 이명호 (LG 마이크론, 한남대학교 정보통계학과) ;
  • 김태규 (LG 마이크론, 한남대학교 정보통계학과)
  • 발행 : 2004.12.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

TDR(Tear Down & Redesign)means that renounce the past resolutely, from a white paper condition, let's change directions. That is, let's redesign from the basic of the establishment of the construction process. Through the switchover the conception, innovate totally the whole existing processes. TDR is the best core innovation activity. The ultimate aim of the TDR activity induces the employees to do more productive business and obtain excellent results in the future by solving the problems, which are the nonproductive business in the business process on the objective view, the business that customers don't recognize the value, the same old practice of business, and the unsettled business from the restriction of resources. By organizing the related to workers of those business, they can solve the problems for 3-4months by full time working This paper inquires what are the obstruction factors on the process of executing TDR activity. Through the search of the reformation plan for the improvement of immersion degree, it presents some methods to be successful business.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 고두균 외(2000), '6시그마경영 이해와 적용', 한국 생산성본부
  2. 김찬규(2003), '종업원의 업무능력을 고려한 종업원 만족도, 생산성 및 고객만족 간 인과관계분석', 한국전자통신연구소 인터넷 경제 연구팀
  3. 김태규 외(2000), '한국적 6시그마 품질혁신 활동 교재', 한국표준협회
  4. 박성현(2002), '현대 실험계획법', 민영사
  5. LG Learning Center(2002), 'Sigma Black Belt 과정 Manual'
  6. LG전자(2002), 'Six Sigma Black Belt 양성교재'
  7. 이레테크(2003), 'Minitab 실무 완성'
  8. 한국능률협회 컨설팅(2001), '6시그마 품질달성을 위한 시스템구축과정 Manual'
  9. Brooke, P.P., Russel, D.W., and Price, J.L.(1988), Discriminant Validation of Measure of Job Satisfaction, Job Involvement, and Organizational Commitment,' Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 139-145 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.73.2.139
  10. Davy, J.A., Kinicki, A.J., and Scheck, C.L.(1991), Developing and Testing a Model of Survivor Responses to Layoffs, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 38, 302-317 https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(91)90032-H
  11. Farkas, A. and Tetrick, L.E. (1989), A Three-wave Longitudinal Analysis of the Casual Ordering of Satisfaction and Commitment on Turnover Decisions, Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 855-868 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.6.855
  12. Hackman, J.R. and Oldham, G.R.(1976), Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250-279 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7
  13. Heskett,J.L., Sasser, W.E., and Schlesinger, L.A.(1997), The Service Profit Chain :How Leading Companies Link Profit and Growth to Loyalty, Satisfaction and Value, Free Press, New York
  14. Kuei, C.H, Madu, C.N., and Lin, C.(2001), The Relationship between Supply Chain Quality Management Practices and Organizational Performance, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 18(8), 864-872 https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006031
  15. Loveman, G.W.(1998), Employee Satisfaction, Customer Loyalty, and Financial Performance: an Empirical Examination of the Service Profit Chain in Result Banking, Journal of Service Research, 1(1), 18-31 https://doi.org/10.1177/109467059800100103
  16. Paul E. Spector, Job Satisfaction - Application, Assessment, Cause, and Consequence, SAGE Publications
  17. Roland T. Rust and Gerg L. Stewart(1996), The Satisfaction and Retention of Frontline Employees - A Customer Satisfaction Measurement Approach, International Journal of Services Industry Management, 7(5), 62-80 https://doi.org/10.1108/09564239610149966
  18. Schnake, M.(1991), Organizational Citizenship: A Review, Proposed Model, and Reserch Agenda, Human Resource, 44, 735-759
  19. Schneider, B. and Bowen, D.(1993), Human Resource Management Is Critical, Organizational Dynamics, 39-52