원자력 QA의 능력수준 평가를 위한 SE-CMM과 KEPIC QAP-1간의 비교

Comparison of SE-CMM and KEPIC QAP-1 for Assessing Capability Level of Nuclear QA

  • 이선기 (대우건설, 플랜트사업본부 발전PJ팀)
  • 발행 : 2004.12.01

초록

Nuclear project company establishes and maintains its QA system in the conformance with applicable Codes & Standards and contract provisions. Certifying agency(e.g., Korea Electric Association) or project owner appraises the effectiveness of the company QA system by surveying or auditing it. However, although the company fulfills the requirements of this survey/audit, the capability level of its nuclear QA system is not appraised numerically and developed in that KEPIC QAP-1, used by the company as a nuclear QA guidebook, does not describe an approach for managing the capability level of the QA system. This study evaluates the characteristics of QAP-1 from the viewpoint of SE-CMM(Capability Maturity Model for Systems Engineering) in order to suggest a possible solution.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 류진수, 김연성, 서우종(2003), '소프트웨어 프로세스 개선을 위한 CMM과 ISO9001 간의 비교 연구', '품질경영학회지', 31권, 1호, pp.76-89
  2. 박정하(2002), 'CMM개념을 활용한 건설PMIS평가모델개발', 건축공학과 석사논문, 동국대학교
  3. 유일상(2004). '개발프로젝트 시스템의 기술관리 설계모델', 시스템공학과 박사논문, 아주대학교
  4. 이원표(2002), 'KEPIC 교재(미출판)', (주)엘리스컨설팅
  5. 조창권, 민성기(2002), '시스템엔지니어링 적용환경 능력평가모델 개발방안 연구', '2002 시스템엔지니어링 춘계 심포지엄 논문집', 한국시스템엔지니어링협회, pp.9-13
  6. 조철행(2003), '원전 건설 및 운영과 KEPIC의 역할', '제1회 KEPIC 주간 행사 발표 자료집', 대한전기협회, pp.66
  7. Minnich Ilene (1996), 'ISO9001 and the SE-CMM', http://www.secat.com/ download/locked_pdf/isovsecm_lkd.pdf, SECAT LLC
  8. Martin, James N.(1997), Systems Engineering Guidebook, CRC Press
  9. Curtis, P., Phillips, D. M., and Weszka, J.(2002), 'CMMISM-The Evolution Continues!', Journal of Systems Engineering, Vol.5, No.1, pp.7-18 https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.10014
  10. SEI(Software Engineering Institute) (1995), A Systems Engineering Capability Maturity Model Version 1.1, CMU/SEI-MM-003, Carnegie Mellon University