Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society (한국경영과학회지)

The Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society (한국경영과학회)
권호 표지

Construction of "CIDEAR" Model for Selecting and Evaluating Cross Impact R & D Projects

상호영향형 R&D과제군의 평가산정을 위한 "CIDEAR" 모형의 개발

  • 권철신 (성균관대학교 시스템경영공학부) ;
  • 박준호 (성균관대학교 시스템경영공학부) ;
  • 홍석기 (LG전자 시스템IC 사업)
  • Published : 2004.09.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to construct $\ulcorner$CIDEAR(Cross Impact-DEA-AR)$\lrcorner$ model which evaluates proposed R&D projects considering cross impact among them and selects proper projects to utilize resources efficiently as well as to maximize efficacy of investments. For this purpose, $\ulcorner$CIDEAR$\lrcorner$ model is designed as the following six steps. $\ulcorner$Decision Theory Evaluation Model$\lrcorner$ is for setting and selecting the evaluation items according to the structured procedure of evaluation system. The priority of items is decided at $\ulcorner$AR Decision Model$\lrcorner$$\ulcorner$Cross Impact Estimation Model$\lrcorner$ is for computing the final probability of success and the result is used to revise the evaluation results of $\ulcorner$Decision Theory Evaluation Model$\lrcorner$. $\ulcorner$Resource Performance Analysis Model$\lrcorner$ classifies the proposed R&D projects on the basis of required resources and expected performance. Consequently, the possibility of bias of project selection can be prevented. $\ulcorner$Priority Oder Decision Model$\lrcorner$ is for computing the efficacy of proposed projects. Finally, $\ulcorner$Efficacy-Efficiency Cause Analysis Model$\lrcorner$ analyzes the structure of efficacy and efficiency of the projects. The major findings and significances of this study are summarized as follows: (1) $\ulcorner$CIDEAR$\lrcorner$ model can deal with the affairs of R&D projects having the characteristics of mutual independence as well as mutual dependence in the point of efficacy and efficiency. Hence, it is possible to evaluate and select R&D projects more accurately. (2) It can be possible to raise the possibility of projects success. R&D manager can use the information for project management because the efficacy-efficiency structure of selected projects can be analyzed. (3) We proved the usefulness of the constructed $\ulcorner$CIDEAR$\lrcorner$ model using an case about twenty-one R&D projects of a leading company of electronic industry in Korea.

Keywords

References

  1. 강희일, 정대영, 윤문길, 'DEA모형을 이용한 유망 정보통신산업 선정에 관한 연구', ‘경영연구’, 제7권, 제1호(2000)
  2. 권철신, ‘R&D 평가론’, 개발공학연구회, 1998
  3. 박준호, 권철신, 김보현, 'R&D 프로젝트의 최적포트폴리오 구축을 위한 새로운 평가모형의 개발', ‘대한산업공학회/한국경영과학회 춘계학술대회’, 2003
  4. 유석천, 임호순, 김연성, '서비스 생산성 측정을 위한 DEN/AR-AHP통합모형 개발에 관한 연구', '한국경영과학회 추계학술발표논문집'(1998), pp.309-394
  5. 유석천, 임호순, 김연성, 'R&D 사업의 평가 및 선정을 위한 DEN/AHP 통합 모형 개발에 관한 연구' '한국경영과학회지', Vol.24, No.4(1999), pp.1-12
  6. 이준승, 김종수, 허선, '전력사업분야의 중장기 기술과제 선정기법', 'IE Interfaces', Vol.13, No.2(2000), pp.166-170
  7. Albala, A., 'Stage Approach for the Evaluation and Selection of R&D Projects,' IEEE Transactions on EM, Vol.EM-22, No.4(1975), pp.153-163
  8. Asher, D.T., 'A Linear Programming Model for the Allocation of R and D Efforts.' IRE Transactions on Engineering Management, (Dec. 1962), pp.154-157
  9. Baker, N.R. and J.R. Freeland, 'Recent Advances in R&D Benefit Measurement and Project Selection Methods,' Management Science, Vol.21, No.10(1975), pp.1164-1175 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.21.10.1164
  10. Banker, RD., A. Charnes and W.W. Cooper, 'Some Modes for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis,' Management Science, Vol.30, No.9(1984), pp.1078-1092 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
  11. Beged Dov, A.G., 'Optimal Assignment of Research and Development Projects on a Large Company using an Integer Programming Model,' IEEE Transactions on EM, Vol.EM-12, No.4(1965), pp.138-142
  12. Catherine, S. and J. Richmond., 'Components of Efficiency Evaluation in Data En velopment Analysis,' European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.80, No.3(1995), pp.462-473 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)00131-U
  13. Cetron, M.J., J. Martino and L. Roepcke, 'The Selection of R&D Program Content-Survey of Quantitative Methods,' IEEE Transactions on EM, Vol.EM-14, No.1(1967), pp.4-13
  14. Charnes, A, W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes., 'Measuring the efficiency of Decision Making Units,' European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.2, No.6(1978), pp.429-444 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  15. Cook, W.D. and L.M. Seifford, 'R&D project selection in a multi-dimensional environment : A practical approach,' J Oper. Res. Soc., Vol:33(1982), pp.397-405
  16. Cooper, W.W., L.M. Seiford and K. Tone, DATA ENVELOPMENT ANAYSIS : A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000
  17. Dean, B.V. and M. Nishry, 'Scoring and Probability Models for Evaluation and Selecting Engineering Projects,' Operations Research, Vol.13, No.4(1965), pp.550-569 https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.13.4.550
  18. Dean, B.V. and S.S. Sengupta, 'Research Budgeting and Project Selection,' IRE Transactions on Engineering Management, (Dec. 1962), pp.158-169
  19. Gear, A.Z., A.G. Lockett and A.W Pearson, 'Analysis of Some Portfolio Selection Mod els for R&D,' IEEE Transactions on EM, Vol.EM-18, No.2(1971), pp.66-76
  20. Gordon, T.J. and H. Hayward, 'Initial Experiments with the Cross Impact Matrix Method of Forecasting,' Futures, Vol.1, No2(1968), pp.110-116
  21. Green, R.H., J.R Doyle and W.D. Cook, 'Efficiency Bounds in Data Envelopment Analysis,' European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.89, No.3(1996), pp.482-490 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00043-7
  22. Hall. D.L. and A Nauda, 'An Interactive Approach for Selecting IR&D Projects,' IEEE Transactions on EM, Vol.37, No.2(1990), pp.126-133
  23. Harris, J.S., 'The New Product Chart : Selecting and Appraising New Projects,' Chemical and Engineering News, Vol.39, No.6(1961), pp.110-118 https://doi.org/10.1021/cen-v039n006.p110
  24. Hashimoto, A , 'A Ranked Voting System Using a DEN/AR Exclusion Model : A Note,' European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.97, No.3(1997), pp.600-604 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00281-0
  25. Helin, A.F. and W.E. Souder, 'Experimental Test of Q-Sort procedure for Prioritizing R&D Projects,' IEEE Transactions on EM, Vol.EM-21, No.4(1974)
  26. Hess, S.W, 'A Dynamic Programming Approach to R&D Budgeting and Project Selection,' IRE Transactions on Engineering Management, (Dec. 1962), pp.170-178
  27. Mandakovic, T. and W.E. Souder, 'An Interactive Decomposable Heuristic for Project Selection,' Management Science , Vol.31, No.10(1985)
  28. Moore, J,R and N.R. Baker, 'Computational Analysis of Scoring Models for R&D Project Selection,' Management Science , Vol.16. No.4(1969), pp.212-232 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.16.4.B212
  29. Mottley, C.M. and R.D. Newton, 'The Selection of Projects for Industrial Research,' The 15th National Meeting of the OR Society of America, Washington, D.C., (May 1959), pp.740-751
  30. Paolini, Jr. A and M.A. Glaser, 'Projection Selection Methods that Pick Winners,' Research Management, Vol.20(1977), pp.26-29
  31. Plebani, L.P. and H.K. Jain, 'Evaluating Research Proposals with Group Techniques,' Research Management, Vol.24(1981), pp.34-38
  32. Pound, W.H., 'Research Project Selection : Testing a Model in the Field,' IEEE Transactions on EM, Vol.EM-11, (Nov. 1964), pp.16-22
  33. Saaty, T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980
  34. Shang, J. and T. Sueyoshi, 'A Unified Framework for the Selection of a Flexible Manufacturing System,' European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.85(1995), pp.297-315
  35. Sigford, J.v. and R.H. Parvin, 'Project PATTERN : A Methodology for Determining Relevance in Complex Decision Making,' IEEE Transactions on EM, Vol.EM-11(Nov. 1964), pp.9-13
  36. Souder, W.E., 'Achieving Organization Consensus with respect to R&D Project Selection Criteria,' Management Science, Vol.21, No.6(1975)
  37. Souder, W.E., 'Systems for Using R&D Project Evaluation Methods,' Research Management, Vol.21(1978), pp.29-37
  38. Thompson, R.G., F.D. Singleton, R.M. Thrall and B.A. Smith, 'Comparative Site Evaluations for locating a High-Energy Physics Lab in Texas,' Interfaces, Vol.16(1986), pp.35-49
  39. Verschuur, J.J. and A.A. Potjer, 'Maximization of the Economic Value of Research Quantifying the Relations between Research and the Market,' IEEE Transactions on EM, Vol.EM-21 , No.4(1974), pp.115-118