Construction of "CIDEAR" Model for Selecting and Evaluating Cross Impact R & D Projects

상호영향형 R&D과제군의 평가산정을 위한 "CIDEAR" 모형의 개발

  • 권철신 (성균관대학교 시스템경영공학부) ;
  • 박준호 (성균관대학교 시스템경영공학부) ;
  • 홍석기 (LG전자 시스템IC 사업)
  • Published : 2004.09.01

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to construct $\ulcorner$CIDEAR(Cross Impact-DEA-AR)$\lrcorner$ model which evaluates proposed R&D projects considering cross impact among them and selects proper projects to utilize resources efficiently as well as to maximize efficacy of investments. For this purpose, $\ulcorner$CIDEAR$\lrcorner$ model is designed as the following six steps. $\ulcorner$Decision Theory Evaluation Model$\lrcorner$ is for setting and selecting the evaluation items according to the structured procedure of evaluation system. The priority of items is decided at $\ulcorner$AR Decision Model$\lrcorner$$\ulcorner$Cross Impact Estimation Model$\lrcorner$ is for computing the final probability of success and the result is used to revise the evaluation results of $\ulcorner$Decision Theory Evaluation Model$\lrcorner$. $\ulcorner$Resource Performance Analysis Model$\lrcorner$ classifies the proposed R&D projects on the basis of required resources and expected performance. Consequently, the possibility of bias of project selection can be prevented. $\ulcorner$Priority Oder Decision Model$\lrcorner$ is for computing the efficacy of proposed projects. Finally, $\ulcorner$Efficacy-Efficiency Cause Analysis Model$\lrcorner$ analyzes the structure of efficacy and efficiency of the projects. The major findings and significances of this study are summarized as follows: (1) $\ulcorner$CIDEAR$\lrcorner$ model can deal with the affairs of R&D projects having the characteristics of mutual independence as well as mutual dependence in the point of efficacy and efficiency. Hence, it is possible to evaluate and select R&D projects more accurately. (2) It can be possible to raise the possibility of projects success. R&D manager can use the information for project management because the efficacy-efficiency structure of selected projects can be analyzed. (3) We proved the usefulness of the constructed $\ulcorner$CIDEAR$\lrcorner$ model using an case about twenty-one R&D projects of a leading company of electronic industry in Korea.

Keywords

References

  1. 강희일, 정대영, 윤문길, 'DEA모형을 이용한 유망 정보통신산업 선정에 관한 연구', ‘경영연구’, 제7권, 제1호(2000)
  2. 권철신, ‘R&D 평가론’, 개발공학연구회, 1998
  3. 박준호, 권철신, 김보현, 'R&D 프로젝트의 최적포트폴리오 구축을 위한 새로운 평가모형의 개발', ‘대한산업공학회/한국경영과학회 춘계학술대회’, 2003
  4. 유석천, 임호순, 김연성, '서비스 생산성 측정을 위한 DEN/AR-AHP통합모형 개발에 관한 연구', '한국경영과학회 추계학술발표논문집'(1998), pp.309-394
  5. 유석천, 임호순, 김연성, 'R&D 사업의 평가 및 선정을 위한 DEN/AHP 통합 모형 개발에 관한 연구' '한국경영과학회지', Vol.24, No.4(1999), pp.1-12
  6. 이준승, 김종수, 허선, '전력사업분야의 중장기 기술과제 선정기법', 'IE Interfaces', Vol.13, No.2(2000), pp.166-170
  7. Albala, A., 'Stage Approach for the Evaluation and Selection of R&D Projects,' IEEE Transactions on EM, Vol.EM-22, No.4(1975), pp.153-163
  8. Asher, D.T., 'A Linear Programming Model for the Allocation of R and D Efforts.' IRE Transactions on Engineering Management, (Dec. 1962), pp.154-157
  9. Baker, N.R. and J.R. Freeland, 'Recent Advances in R&D Benefit Measurement and Project Selection Methods,' Management Science, Vol.21, No.10(1975), pp.1164-1175 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.21.10.1164
  10. Banker, RD., A. Charnes and W.W. Cooper, 'Some Modes for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis,' Management Science, Vol.30, No.9(1984), pp.1078-1092 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
  11. Beged Dov, A.G., 'Optimal Assignment of Research and Development Projects on a Large Company using an Integer Programming Model,' IEEE Transactions on EM, Vol.EM-12, No.4(1965), pp.138-142
  12. Catherine, S. and J. Richmond., 'Components of Efficiency Evaluation in Data En velopment Analysis,' European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.80, No.3(1995), pp.462-473 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)00131-U
  13. Cetron, M.J., J. Martino and L. Roepcke, 'The Selection of R&D Program Content-Survey of Quantitative Methods,' IEEE Transactions on EM, Vol.EM-14, No.1(1967), pp.4-13
  14. Charnes, A, W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes., 'Measuring the efficiency of Decision Making Units,' European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.2, No.6(1978), pp.429-444 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  15. Cook, W.D. and L.M. Seifford, 'R&D project selection in a multi-dimensional environment : A practical approach,' J Oper. Res. Soc., Vol:33(1982), pp.397-405
  16. Cooper, W.W., L.M. Seiford and K. Tone, DATA ENVELOPMENT ANAYSIS : A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000
  17. Dean, B.V. and M. Nishry, 'Scoring and Probability Models for Evaluation and Selecting Engineering Projects,' Operations Research, Vol.13, No.4(1965), pp.550-569 https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.13.4.550
  18. Dean, B.V. and S.S. Sengupta, 'Research Budgeting and Project Selection,' IRE Transactions on Engineering Management, (Dec. 1962), pp.158-169
  19. Gear, A.Z., A.G. Lockett and A.W Pearson, 'Analysis of Some Portfolio Selection Mod els for R&D,' IEEE Transactions on EM, Vol.EM-18, No.2(1971), pp.66-76
  20. Gordon, T.J. and H. Hayward, 'Initial Experiments with the Cross Impact Matrix Method of Forecasting,' Futures, Vol.1, No2(1968), pp.110-116
  21. Green, R.H., J.R Doyle and W.D. Cook, 'Efficiency Bounds in Data Envelopment Analysis,' European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.89, No.3(1996), pp.482-490 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00043-7
  22. Hall. D.L. and A Nauda, 'An Interactive Approach for Selecting IR&D Projects,' IEEE Transactions on EM, Vol.37, No.2(1990), pp.126-133
  23. Harris, J.S., 'The New Product Chart : Selecting and Appraising New Projects,' Chemical and Engineering News, Vol.39, No.6(1961), pp.110-118 https://doi.org/10.1021/cen-v039n006.p110
  24. Hashimoto, A , 'A Ranked Voting System Using a DEN/AR Exclusion Model : A Note,' European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.97, No.3(1997), pp.600-604 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00281-0
  25. Helin, A.F. and W.E. Souder, 'Experimental Test of Q-Sort procedure for Prioritizing R&D Projects,' IEEE Transactions on EM, Vol.EM-21, No.4(1974)
  26. Hess, S.W, 'A Dynamic Programming Approach to R&D Budgeting and Project Selection,' IRE Transactions on Engineering Management, (Dec. 1962), pp.170-178
  27. Mandakovic, T. and W.E. Souder, 'An Interactive Decomposable Heuristic for Project Selection,' Management Science , Vol.31, No.10(1985)
  28. Moore, J,R and N.R. Baker, 'Computational Analysis of Scoring Models for R&D Project Selection,' Management Science , Vol.16. No.4(1969), pp.212-232 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.16.4.B212
  29. Mottley, C.M. and R.D. Newton, 'The Selection of Projects for Industrial Research,' The 15th National Meeting of the OR Society of America, Washington, D.C., (May 1959), pp.740-751
  30. Paolini, Jr. A and M.A. Glaser, 'Projection Selection Methods that Pick Winners,' Research Management, Vol.20(1977), pp.26-29
  31. Plebani, L.P. and H.K. Jain, 'Evaluating Research Proposals with Group Techniques,' Research Management, Vol.24(1981), pp.34-38
  32. Pound, W.H., 'Research Project Selection : Testing a Model in the Field,' IEEE Transactions on EM, Vol.EM-11, (Nov. 1964), pp.16-22
  33. Saaty, T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980
  34. Shang, J. and T. Sueyoshi, 'A Unified Framework for the Selection of a Flexible Manufacturing System,' European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.85(1995), pp.297-315
  35. Sigford, J.v. and R.H. Parvin, 'Project PATTERN : A Methodology for Determining Relevance in Complex Decision Making,' IEEE Transactions on EM, Vol.EM-11(Nov. 1964), pp.9-13
  36. Souder, W.E., 'Achieving Organization Consensus with respect to R&D Project Selection Criteria,' Management Science, Vol.21, No.6(1975)
  37. Souder, W.E., 'Systems for Using R&D Project Evaluation Methods,' Research Management, Vol.21(1978), pp.29-37
  38. Thompson, R.G., F.D. Singleton, R.M. Thrall and B.A. Smith, 'Comparative Site Evaluations for locating a High-Energy Physics Lab in Texas,' Interfaces, Vol.16(1986), pp.35-49
  39. Verschuur, J.J. and A.A. Potjer, 'Maximization of the Economic Value of Research Quantifying the Relations between Research and the Market,' IEEE Transactions on EM, Vol.EM-21 , No.4(1974), pp.115-118