International Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems

Korean Institute of Intelligent Systems (한국지능시스템학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Benchmarking Evaluation of Web System Using Fuzzy Sets

  • Published : 2004.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

For Web System composed of a variety of hardware, software and network system, there is a wide difference in price, function and capacity. In addition, it is important to select the most suitable system when web system is constructed as the claim of high-quality web service from user has increased. Data of bench-marking is usually employed when the system is selected. Evaluation with the result of bench-marking, however, is not easy at web situation composed of a variety of systems. In this paper, first integrated bench-marking of hardware, software and network system metric were determined, and the plan to effectively compare and evaluate the result of bench-marking by using fuzzy set were offered.

Keywords

References

  1. M. C. Paulk, B. Curitis, M. B. Chrissis, C. V. Beber, 'Capability Maturity Model for Software Version 1.1,' Software Engineering Institude, CMU/SEI-93 -TR-24, 1993, 2
  2. 황선명, 강성기, '소프트웨어 품질평가 메트릭스 분석,' 대전대학교 산업정보연구소 연구논문, 제10권 2호, pp.3-9, 1999
  3. 김창민, 'CMFstone: 유닉스 기반한 합성 사용자 프로그래밍 벤치마크.' 자연과학연구, 성결대학교 자연과학연구소, 제1집, pp. 17-39, 1996
  4. L. Press, 'Benchmarks for LAN Performance Evaluation,' Communications of the ACM, Vol. 31, No.8, pp. 1014-1017, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1145/63030.63038
  5. R. H. Saavedra and A. J. Smith, 'Analysis of Benchmark Characteristics and Benchmark Performance Prediction,' ACM Transactions on Computer systems, Vol. 14, No.4, pp. 344-384, November 1996 https://doi.org/10.1145/235543.235545
  6. C. Williamson, R. Simmonds and M. Arlitt, 'A case study of Web server benchmarking using parallel WAN emulation,' Performance Evaluation, Vol. 49, pp. 111-127, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-5316(02)00107-4
  7. R. eigenmann, Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking With realistic Applications, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2001
  8. R. Jain, The Art of Computer Systems Performance Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, INC., 1991
  9. ISO/lEC 9126, Information Technology-Software Quality Characteristics and metrics
  10. 양해술, 'Embedded S/W의 품질평가 모델 개발 연구', TTA, 2002
  11. SPEC, http://www.spec.org
  12. TPC, http://www.tpc.org
  13. VeriTest, http://www.veritest.com
  14. R. C. Wilson, Unix Test Tools and Benchmarks, Prentice Hall Inc., 1995
  15. R. W. Hockney, The Science of Computer Benchmarking' Society for Industrial and applied Mathematics, 1996
  16. J. P. Hayes, Computer Architecture and Organization, McGraw-Hill, 1978
  17. W. SU. Stanley, Database Computers, McGraw- Hill, 1988
  18. M. Schwartz, Telecommunication Networks - Protocols, Modeling and Analysis, Addison Wesley, 1987
  19. TTA, '소프트웨어 검증 및 확인 계획서 지침,' 정보통신단체표준 TTAS.IE- 1059, 2001
  20. TTA, '소프트웨어 품질 메트릭 방법론 표준,' 정보통 신단체표준 TTA.IE-1061, 1999
  21. 정보통신부, '소프트웨어 품질의 측정, 평점 및 심사를 위한 기술지원서,' 한국전산망 표준 KICS.IS-8402, 1994
  22. 김두완, 허천희, 정구범, 정은영, 김재웅, '퍼지집합을 이용한 인터넷 응용 시스템 평가,' 한국인터넷정보학회 추계학술발표대회 논문집, 제4권 2호, pp. 549-552, 2003
  23. 김국보, '컴퓨터통합생산 시스템 구축을 위한 제안 시스템의 적합성 평가,' 대구카톨릭대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, 1997
  24. M.M. Gupta, T. Fuzzy Computing, Elsevier Science Pub., pp.500, 1988
  25. 이광형, 오길록, 퍼지이론 및 응용(II 권: 응용), 홍릉과학출판사, 1992
  26. S. M. Chen, 'A new approach to handing fuzzy decision marking problems,' IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybem., Vol. 18, No 6, pp.1012-1016, 198