Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

  • 제29권6호
  • /
  • Pages.504-514
  • /
  • 2004
  • /
  • 2234-7658(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-7666(eISSN)
대한치과보존학회 (The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

LIGHT EMITTING DIODE로 광조사한 상아질 접착제의 상아질 전단접착강도와 중합률에 관한 연구

Dentin bond strength of bonding agents cured with Light Emitting Diode

  • 김선영 (서울대학교 치과대학 치의학과 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 이인복 (서울대학교 치과대학 치의학과 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 조병훈 (서울대학교 치과대학 치의학과 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 손호현 (서울대학교 치과대학 치의학과 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 김미자 (서울대학교 치과대학 치의학과 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 석창인 (서울대학교 치과대학 치의학과 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 엄정문 (서울대학교 치과대학 치의학과 치과보존학교실)
  • Kim Sun-Young (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee In-Bog (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Cho Byeong-Hoon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Son Ho-Hyun (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim Mi-Ja (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Seok Chang-In (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Um Chung-Moon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 발행 : 2004.11.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

LED 광중합기(Elipar FreeLight, 3M-ESPE)와 할로겐 광중합기(VIP Bisco)로 광조사한 수종의 상아질 접착제에 대해서 상아질 전단접착강도를 비교하였다 또한 이번 연구의 광학적 근거를 얻기 위해 두 광중합기의 파장에 따른 광강도와 스펙트럼을 비교하였다. 이번 연구에서 사용된 상아질 접착제는 Scotchbond Multipurpose (3M ESPE), Single Bond (3M ESPE). One-Step (Bisco), Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray), Adper Prompt (3M ESPE) 이다. VIP는 487 nm에서 최대정점을 가지는 넓은 스펙트럼의 분포를 보이는 반면에, Elipar FreeLight는 465 nm에서의 최대정점을 중심으로 좁은 스펙트럼의 분포를 보였다. Clearfil SE bond를 제외하고 할로겐과 LED로 광조사 한 각 상아질 접착제에서 상아질 전단접착강도값의 유의성 있는 차이는 보이지 않았다 (P > 0.05). 이러한 결과는 camphoroquinone의 흡수스펙트럼과 LED의 좁은 영역의 스펙트럼사이에 강한 연관성으로 설명할 수 있다.

This study compared the dentin shear bond strengths of currently used dentin bonding agents that were irradiated with an LED (Elipar FreeLight, 3M-ESPE) and a halogen light (VIP, BISCO). The optical characteristics of two light curing units were evaluated. Extracted human third molars were prepared to expose the occlusal dentin and the bonding procedures were performed under the irradiation with each light curing unit. The dentin bonding agents used in this study were Scotchbond Multipurpose (3M ESPE), Single Bond (3M ESPE), One-Step (Bisco), Clearfil SE bond (Kuraray), and Adper Prompt (3M ESPE), The shear test was performed by employing the design of a chisel-on-iris supported with a Teflon wall. The fractured dentin surface was observed with SEM to determine the failure mode. The spectral appearance of the LED light curing unit was different from that of the halogen light curing unit in terms of maximum peak and distribution. The LED LCU (maximum peak in 465 nm) shows a narrower spectral distribution than the halogen LCU (maximum peak in 487 nm). With the exception of the Clearfil SE bond (P < 0.05), each 4 dentin bonding agents showed no significant difference between the halogen light-cured group and the LED light-cured group in the mean shear bond strength (P > 0.05). The results can be explained by the strong correlation between the absorption spectrum of camphoroquinone and the narrow emission spectrum of LED.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment. Visible light-cured and activating units. J Am Dent Assac 110(1) : 100-102, 1985 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1985.0284
  2. Blankenau RJ, Kelsey WP, Powell GL, Shearer GO, Barkmeier WW, Cavel WT. Degree of composite resin polymerization with visible light and argon laser. Am J Dent 4(1) : 40-42, 1991
  3. Ferracane JL, Mitchem JC, Condon JR. Todd R. Wear and marginal breakdown of composites with various degrees of cure. J Dent Res 76(8): 1508-1516, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345970760081401
  4. Rueggeberg FA, Twiggs SW, Caughman WF, Khajotia, S. Life-time intensity profiles of 11 light-curing units. J Dent Res 75:380, Abstr. No. 2897, 1996
  5. Friedman J. Variability of lamp characteristics in dental curing lights. J Esthet Dent 1(6):189-190, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1989.tb00500.x
  6. Martin FE. A survey of the efficiency of visible light curing units. J Dent 26(3) :239-243, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00004-3
  7. Barghi N. Berry T, Hatton C. Evaluating intensity output of curing lights in private dental offices. J Am Dent Assac 125(7) : 992-996, 1994 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1994.0204
  8. Miyazaki M, Hattori T, Ichiishi Y, Kondo M, Onose H, Moore BK. Evaluation of curing units used in private dental offices. Oper Dent 23(2):50-54, 1998
  9. Mills RW. Blue light emitting diodes: Another method of light curing? Br Dent J 178: 169, 1995
  10. Nakamura S, Mukai T, Senoh M. Candela-class high brightness InGaN/AIGaN double heterostructure bluelight-emitting diodes. Appl Phys Lett 64:1687-1689, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.111832
  11. Duke ES. Light-emitting diodes in composite resin photopolymerization. Campend Cantin Educ Dent 22(9): 722-725, 2001
  12. Yap AU, Soh MS. Thermal emission by different light curing units. Oper Dent 28(3) :260-266, 2003
  13. Fujibayashi K. Ishimaru K. Takahashi N, Kohno A. Newly developed curing unit using blue light-emitting diodes. Dent Jap 34: 49-53, 1998
  14. Mills RW, Jandt KD, Ashworth SH. Dental composite depth of cure with halogen and blue light emitting diode (LED) technology. Br Dent J 186(8) : 388-391, 1999
  15. Stahl F, Ashworth SH, Jandt KD, Mills RW. Light emitting diode (LED) polymerization of dental composites: flexural properties and polymerization potential. Biamaterials 21(13): 1379-1385, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00029-6
  16. Mills RW, Uhl A, Jandt KD. Optical power outputs, spectral and dental composite depths of cure, obtained with blue light emitting diode (LED) and halogen light curing units (LCUs). Br Dent J 193(8) :459-463, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801597
  17. Hansen EK. Asumussen E. Reliability of three dental radiometers. Scand J Dent Res 101(2): 115-119, 1993
  18. Leonard DL, Charlton DG, Hilton TJ. Effect of curing-tip diameter on the accuracy of dental radiometers. Oper Dent 24(1):31-37, 1999
  19. Cook, W.D. Spectral distribution of dental photopolymerization sources. J Dent Res 61: 1436-1438. 1982 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345820610121201
  20. McCabe JF, Carnick TE. Output from visible-light activation units and depth of cure of light-activated composites. J Dent Res 68(11): 1534-1539, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680111301
  21. Nomoto R. Effect of light wavelength on polymerization of light-cured resins. Dent Mater J 16(1) :60-73, 1997 https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.16.60
  22. Dickens SH, Milos MF. Relationship of dentin shear bond strengths to different laboratory test designs. Am J Dent 15(3) : 185-192, 2002
  23. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WHo Why do shear bond tests pull out dentin? J Dent Res 76(6): 1298-1307, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345970760061001
  24. Stansbury, J. W. Curing dental resins and composites by photopolymerization. J Esthet Dent 12:300-308, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00239.x
  25. Hayakawa T, Kikutake K. Nemoto K. Effectiveness of the addition of water-soluble photoinitiator into the self-etching primers on the adhesion of a resin composite to polished dentin and enamel. Dent Mater J 18(3) :324-333, 1999 https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.18.324
  26. Burgess JO, DeGoes M, Walker R, Ripps AH. An evaluation of four light-curing units comparing soft and hard curing. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 11(1): 125-132, 1999
  27. Koliniotou-Kubia E, Jacobsen PH. The effect of irradiantion time on the physicalperoperties of light-cured resins. Clin Mater 6(1) :21-28, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/0267-6605(90)90041-S
  28. Takahashi A, Sato Y. Uno S, Pereira PN. Sano H. Effects of mechanical properties of adhesive resins on bond strength to dentin. Dent Mater 18(3): 263-268, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00046-X