Alteration of Gene Expressions in Human Endometrial Stromal Cells by Exogeneous FSH Treatments

난포자극호르몬이 인간의 자궁 기질세포의 유전자 발현 양상에 미치는 영향

  • Choi, Hye-Won (Laboratory of Reproductive Biology & Infertility, Samsung Cheil Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Jun, Jin-Hyun (Laboratory of Reproductive Biology & Infertility, Samsung Cheil Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Hyoung-Song (Laboratory of Reproductive Biology & Infertility, Samsung Cheil Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Hong, In-Sun (Department of Veterinary Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine Seoul National University) ;
  • Kang, Kyung-Sun (Department of Veterinary Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine Seoul National University) ;
  • Koong, Mi-Kyoung (Department of Ob/Gyn, Samsung Cheil Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • 최혜원 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성제일병원 생식생물학 및 불임연구실) ;
  • 전진현 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성제일병원 생식생물학 및 불임연구실) ;
  • 이형송 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성제일병원 생식생물학 및 불임연구실) ;
  • 홍인선 (서울대학교 수의과대학 공중보건학교실) ;
  • 강경선 (서울대학교 수의과대학 공중보건학교실) ;
  • 궁미경 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성제일병원 산부인과)
  • Published : 2004.12.30

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effects of recombinant FSH (rFSH) and urinary FSH (uFSH) on the gene expressions of human endometrial stromal cells in vitro. Methods: Endometrial tissue was obtained from a pre-menopausal women undergoing hysterectomy. Primary endometrial stromal cells were isolated and in vitro cultured with FBS-free DMEM/F-12 containing 0, 10, 100, and 1, 000 mIU/ml of rFSH and uFSH for 48 hours, respectively. Total RNA was extracted from the cultured cells and subjected to real time RT-PCR for the quantitative analysis of progesterone receptor (PR), estrogen receptor $\alpha/\beta$ (ER-$\alpha/\beta$), cyclooxygenase 2 (Cox-2), leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), homeobox A10-1 and -2 (HoxA10-1/-2). Results: Both hormone treatments slightly increased (< 3 folds) the expressions of PR, ER-$\beta$ and HoxA10-1/-2 gene. However, ER-$\alpha$ expression was increased up to five folds by treatments of both FSH for 48 hours. The LIF expression by the 10 mIU/ml of uFSH for 12 hours was significantly higher than that of rFSH (p<0.01). After 24 hours treatment of two kinds of hormones, the expression patterns of LIF were similar. The 100 and 1, 000 mIU/ml of rFSH induced significantly higher amount of Cox-2 expression than those of uFSH, respectively (p<0.05). Conclusion: This study represents no adversely effect of exogeneous gonadotropins, rFSH and uFSH, on the expression of implantation related genes. We suggest that rFSH is applicable for the assisted reproductive technology without any concern on the endometrial receptivity.

Keywords

References

  1. Giudice E, Crisci C, Eshkol A, Papoian R. Com-position of commercial gonadotrophin preparations extracted from human post-menopausal urine: char-acterization of non-gonadotrophin proteins. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 2291-9 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138440
  2. Daya S, Gunby J. Recombinant versus urinary folli-cle stimulating hormone for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 2207-15 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.9.2207
  3. Goldfarb JM, Desai N. Follitropin-$\alpha$ versus human menopausal gonadotropin in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril 2003; 80: 1094-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(03)02188-5
  4. Themmen APN, Huhtaniemi IT. Mutations of gona-dotropins and gonadotropin receptors: elucidating the physiology and pathophysiology of pituitary-gonadal function. Endocr Rev 2000; 21: 551-83 https://doi.org/10.1210/er.21.5.551
  5. Fowler PA, Huhtaniemi IT. The ovarian gonadotro-pin receptors in health and disease. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2002; 3: 55-63 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012752819058
  6. Murdoch WJ. Immunolocalization of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor site in murine endo-metrium that mediates apoptosis. Cell Tissue Res 1995; 282: 527-9 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00318886
  7. Popovici RM, Kao LC, Giudice LC. Discovery of new inducible genes in in vitro decidualized human endometrial stromal cells using microarray techno-logy. Endocrinology 2000; 141: 3510-3 https://doi.org/10.1210/en.141.9.3510
  8. Shemesh M. Actions of gonadotrophins on the uterus. Reproduction 2001; 121: 835-42 https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.0.1210835
  9. Patsoula E, Loutradis D, Drakakis P, Michalas L, Bletsa R, Michalas S. Messenger RNA expression for the follicle stimulating hormone receptor and luteinizing hormone receptor in human oocytes and preimplantation stage embryos. Fertil Steril 2003; 79: 1187-93 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00071-2
  10. Han SW, Lei ZM, Rao ChV. Up-regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 gene expression by chorionic gona-dotropin during the differentiation of human endo-metrial stromal cells into decidua. Endocrinology 1996; 137: 1791-7 https://doi.org/10.1210/en.137.5.1791
  11. Zhou XL, Lei ZM, Rao ChV. Treatment of human endometrial gland epithelial cells with chorionic gonadotropin/luteinizing hormone increases the ex-pression of the cyclooxygenase-2 gene. J Clin Endo-crinol Metab 1999; 84: 3364-77 https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.84.9.3364
  12. Fisch B, Avrech OM, Pinkas H, Neri A, Rufas O, Ovadia J, et al. Superovulation before IVF by re-combinant versus urinary human FSH (combined with a long GnRH analog protocol): a comparative study. J Assist Reprod Genet 1995; 12: 26-31 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02214125
  13. Loumaye E, Martineau I, Piazzi A, O'Dea L, Ince S, Howles C, et al. Clinical assessment of human gona-dotrophins produced by recombinant DNA techno-logy. Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 95-107
  14. Filicori M, Cognigni GE, Pocognoli P, Ciampaglia W. Choice of ovarian stimulation regimens in assis-ted reproduction: finding the thread in the gonado-tropin maze. Fertil Steril 2003; 80: 1114-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(03)02192-7
  15. Taylor HS, Daftary GS, Selam B. Endometrial HOXA10 expression after controlled ovarian hyper-stimulation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hor-mone. Fertil Steril 2003; 80: 839-43 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00985-3
  16. Julia TA, Lessey BA, Seppala M, Kaufman DG. Endometrial stromal cells regulate epithelial cell growth in vitro: a new co-culture model. Hum Re-prod 2001; 16: 836-45
  17. 홍인선, 김석현, 궁미경, 전진현, 이영순, 강경선. 자궁내막 세포의 분리 및 배양 그리고 불멸화된 세포주의 확립. 대한불임학회지 2003; 12: 317 -24
  18. Paulson RJ, Sauer MV, Lobo RA. Embryo implan-tation after human in vitro fertilization: importance of endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril 1990; 53: 870-4
  19. Simon C, Cano F, Valbuena D, Remohi J, Pellicer A. Clinical evidence for a detrimental effect on uterine receptivity of high serum oestradiol concentrations in high and normal responder patients. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 2432-7 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136313
  20. Pellicer A, Valbuena D, Cano F, Remohi J, Simon C. Lower implantation rates in high responders: evide-nce for an altered endocrine milieu during the pre-implantation period. Fertil Steril 1996; 65: 1190-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58337-X
  21. Check JH, Choe JK, Katsoff D, Summers-Chase D, Wilson C. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation ad-versely affects implantation following in vitro fe-rtilization-embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet 1999; 16: 416-20 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020565408018