A Visual-perceptive Study on Closed and Open Forms of Ethnic Looks since the 1980s

1990년대 이후 에스닉 룩의 폐쇄형과 개방형의 시지각적 연구

  • 서봉하 (서울대학교 의류학과, 용인송담대학 스타일리스트과)
  • Published : 2004.07.01

Abstract

This study is regarding closed and open forms, which have relatively high recognition among visual perception phenomena in costumes. In particular, this study reviewed closeness and openness of ethnic look, which is a representative open costume. Closed form can be summarized as simple and clear silhouette, conspicuous differentiation from the background, simple construction of the costume and colors with low brightness and clearness. It Is modern, functional, rational and modest. On the other hand, open form can be summarized as complicated and inconspicuous edge line, complicated inner shape and colors with high brightness, high clearness and vividness. It includes concepts of pleasure, entertainment, joy, eroticism, rebel and resistance. Modern costumes have been simplified for a long time and they have functional and closed characteristics in their shape, structure and form. On the other hand, modern open form costumes are usually found in sub-cultural styles such as punk, hippie, kitsch and vintage, and some ethnic looks. Following is a summary of the characteristics of open form shown in the ethnic look. 1. The shape, structure of costumes, hair accessories, lace, ruffle and ornaments are complicated and irregular. 2. The silhouette is inconspicuous because of ambiguity between backgrounds and ABC (Apparel-Body-Construct) or the use of see-through materials. 3. It makes complicated visual shapes because it does not have a single type but is composed of various clothing items together. 4. It gives complex feelings by matching various colors or more than two different fabrics. 5. It looks like the open type because of the complex patterns shown in the costumes.

Keywords

References

  1. 김성훈, 윤재성 (2002). 타이포그래피디자인의 시지각 연구. 디자인과학연구, 5(2), pp.21-28
  2. 고경숙 (1988). 패션에 나타난 폐쇄형디자인과 개방형디자인에 관한 연구. 홍익대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
  3. 연세대 언어정보개발연구소 (2002). 연세 한국어사전. 서울: 두산동아
  4. 김민자 (1998). 20세기 패션에 나타난 모더니즘과 포스트모더니즘에 대한 연구(1). 복식, 37, p. 113
  5. Wolfflin, H. Translated by Hottinger, M. D. (1929). Principles of art history. New York: Dover Publication, pp. 13-16
  6. DeLong, M. R., 금기숙 역 (1997). 복식 조형을 보는 시각. 서울: 이즘, p. 24
  7. Wallschlaeger, C., & Busic-Snyder, C. (1998). 디자인의 개념과 원리. 서울: 안그라픽스, p. 373, p. 422
  8. Wolfflin, H. Translated by Hottinger, M. D. (1929). Principles of art history. New York: Dover Publication, p. 13
  9. Wallschlaeger, C., & Busic-Snyder, C. (1998). 디자인의 개념과 원리. 서울: 안그라픽스, p. 356
  10. 지상현 (2002). 시각예술과 디자인의 심리학. 서울: 민음사, p. 25
  11. Arnheim, R. (1960). Art and visual perception-a psychology of the creative eye. Los Angeles: University of California, p. 300
  12. 정홍숙 (1997). 서앙복식문화사. 서울: 교문사. p. 411
  13. DeLong, M. R., 금기숙 역 (1997). 복식 조형을 보는 시각. 서울: 이즘, pp. 25-26
  14. 고경숙 (1988). 패션에 나타난 폐쇄형디자인과 개방형디자인에 관한 연구. 홍익대학교 대학원 석사학위논문, p. 91
  15. 임은혁 (2002), 1990년 대 패션에 나타난 하위문화 스타일. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문, pp. 84-85
  16. 라사라교육개발원 (1992). 복식사전. 서울: 도서출판 라사라. p. 48
  17. 정연자 (1993), 현대 패션에 나타난 민속풍에 관한 연구. 대한가정학회지, 31(4). p. 218
  18. 김민자 (2003), 복식미학. 가제본 서적, p. 64
  19. 간문자 (1996), 1960년대 저항 패션이 민속풍 패션에 끼친 영향. 복식, 30, p. 153