Comparison of the Opinion about Senior Congregate Housing According to Socio-Economic Status -with special on the Seoul Metropolitan area, Busan, Gwangaju and Daejun-

사회경제적 지위에 따른 노인공동생활주택에 대한 견해의 지역별 비교 - 서울ㆍ수도권, 부산, 광주, 대전 지역을 중심으로-

  • 홍형옥 (경희대학교 아동주거학과 주거환경전공) ;
  • 지은영 (경희대학교 아동주거학과 주거환경전공)
  • Published : 2004.07.01

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the influence of socio-economic status of potential consumers on the types of senior congregate housing(SCH) among 4 urban areas(Seoul Metropolitan area, Busan, Gwangaju, and Daejun). This study was part or a research series to develop SCH which meets the korean situation. The Questionnaire used for the final analysis involved 1006 people and SPSS Windows program was used for statistical analysis. The opinion about SCH should differ among the 4 urban areas according to Socio-Economic Status(SES). The results of this study were as follows: The opinions on SCH varied in each region according to SES indicating that diverse constructions of senior housing to meet selective needs of the old can create high demand in a construction market. In order to induce active participation of the private sector, the Ministry of Construction and Transportation, rather than the Ministry of Health and Welfare, should be in charge of the development of SCH. This is desirable in the perspective of developing new types of housing as for general housing. In this case, the Ministry of Construction and Transportation should consider geographic locations and environmental factors of each city. Moreover, the successful development of SCH needs an effort to reexamine an appropriate development plan rather than adopting the cases of developed countries without criticism. In terms of policies, the government should provide financial support for building sharing space, give an exception on a measurement rate, assist in the education of supervisors and establish a management system and so on.

Keywords

References

  1. 오혜경, 홍이경, 박민진(2003). 미국 노인주거시설 개별공간구성의 특성에 관한 연구 -캘리포니아 지역을 중심으로-. 대한가정학회, 제 56차 추계학술대회, 135
  2. 최성재(1998). 고령화사회의 노인시설 유형과 전망. 대한건축학회지, 건축 42(2), 14-21
  3. 흥두승(1983). 한국사회의 전통과 변화. 서울: 서울대 사회학연구회
  4. 홍형옥(1999). 한국의 지역사회통합형 노인주거의 대안적 모색 -노인공동생활주택의 개념 도입과 제도적 탐색-. 한국주택학회지, 7(2), 75-91
  5. 홍형옥(2001a). 노인공동생활주택에 대한 태도와 선호. 한국가정관리학회지, 19(5), 147-166
  6. 홍형옥(2001b). 영국의 노인공동생활주택에 대한 검토. 한국가정관리학회지, 19(4), 49-68
  7. 홍형옥(2002). 노인의 지역사회보호에 있어서 주거관리의 역활과 쟁점. 한국가정관리학회지, 20(5), 51-68
  8. 홍형옥, 지은영(2002). 사회계층별 노인생활지원주택에 대한 태도와 선호. 한국가정관리학회지, 20(2), 83-95
  9. 홍형옥, 지은영(2003a). 노인공동생활주택 개발을 위한 지역사회보호 체계와 주거서비스 요구도. 대한가정학회 제56차 추계학술대회, 95
  10. 홍형옥, 지은영(2003b). 노인공동생활주택에 대한 지역별 견해 비교. 한국주거학회지, 제 14차 추계학술대회
  11. C. Liam (1984). Domiciliary Services for the Elderly. London: Croom Helem
  12. Hyung-Ock Hong, Rhee, K. H., Kwon, O. J., Kim, D.Y., Choi, J.S. & Cho, J.S (2003). Attitudes toward Elderly Housing Issues and Preferences of the Middle Aged Korean, The 12th Biennial International Congress of Asian Regional Association for Home Economics, 234
  13. Hyung-Ock Hong, In-Soo Kwak & Kyung-Hee Rhee(2003). A Study on Korean Adaptation of Congregate Housing for Elderly people of Sweden and Denmark, The Stockholm Symposium on Nordic Studies, 22-47
  14. Hyung-Ock Hong & Byung-Sun You (2003). Comparision of Three Countries about Congregate Housing for Older People-with focus to Sweden, U.K and Korea. The Stockholm Symposium on Nordic Studies, 48-68
  15. Oh Hye-Kyung & Hong Yi-Kyung (2003). Preference according to socio-economic status for the location and interior/exterior space of senior congregate housing, Istanbul technical university-Urban and Environmental Planning and Research center, Interntional Conference
  16. England, J., Oldman, C. & Hearnshaw, S. (2000). A question of shared care? The role of relatives in sheltered housing. Oxford: Anchor Trust
  17. Heywood, F. Oldman, C. & Means, R. (2002). Housing and home in later life. Open University Press
  18. Tinker, A. (1996). Older people in modern society. 4th ed. Londen: Longman