A Study on the Cyber Museum Organization System for Intangible Cultural Properties III - Focused on the Chungnam Province -

무형문화재를 위한 사이버뮤지엄 구성체계에 관한 연구 III - 충남지역을 중심으로 -

  • 한영호 (상명대학교 디자인학부 실내디자인전공) ;
  • 장중식 (국민대학교 조형대학 공업디자인전공) ;
  • 정용섭 (4D 디자인연구소)
  • Published : 2004.06.01

Abstract

The findings of this study indicate that intangible cultural properties are worth preservation and transmission and should be considered as very important as tangible cultural properties. If the studies of intangible cultural properties are continued focusing on their characteristics and formational system, they can be expressed more properly by adding new interactive elements to database and expressive requisites. New techniques introduced in this study are believed to provide people with most reasonable and developmental motives for expression of the existing intangible cultural properties. Concerning Korea's cultural properties centered on intangible cultural properties, information construction should be made with a new idea of information based on database from the previous studies. The result will be able to set an important factor to give wide publicity to our cultural identity, which is currently shown in the process of background communication, and serve as a foothold to deliver exact information to our descendants. The intangible cultural properties are our people's mental cultural heritage resources. If museums or initiator groups, which are organized to spread cultural heritages, can use them as the subjects of exhibition through information construction and visualization, it will function to maximize the educational effect of transmitting our national mental world. The development of digital environment will provide the optimum conditions and tools making it possible to visualize intangible forms and ideas in a virtual cyber space. Given these viewpoints, steady studies and efforts for the improvement of Korea's cultural image should be made in the way of intangible cultural properties as well as tangible ones. They start from the country's accurate appreciation of cultural properties and are embodied in systematic adjustment and relationship between interdependent elements.

Keywords

References

  1. 김경균 외, Information Architecture, 디자인 정글, 2001
  2. 구세연, 사이버 뮤지엄의 구성과 구조에 관한 고찰, 홍익대학교, 2001
  3. 나재오, 한국 전통문화 요소의 시각적 상징화에 관한 연구, 산업자원부,1998
  4. 남경화, 뮤지엄 체험 향상을 위한 관람자 연구, 예술대학원, 2002
  5. 문화재관리국, 무형문화재의 전승, 보급제도의 발전방향, 문화재관리, 1998
  6. 송정화, 사이버 전시관의 Information Architecture와 그 구성에 관한연구, 홍익대학교, 2001
  7. 송진회, 한국 문화 이미지의 세계화 연구(무형문화재의 시각화를 중심으로), 산업자원부, 2002
  8. 이용학, 무형문화재 전승, 보존 활성화 방안에 관한 연구, 연세대학교, 1999
  9. 이은종, Web Usability : The art of e-biz Intelligenc, 삼성 멀티캠퍼스 세미나, 2000
  10. 클레멘트목, 김옥철 옮김, 디지털시대의 정보디자인, 안그라픽스, 2000
  11. 한국관광공사, 한국 문화유산 관광 상품화 방안, 한국관광공사, 1996
  12. 한국디자인진흥원, 한국디자인 특성화연구를 통한 디자인산업 특화전략, 산업자원부, 2002
  13. Ambrose, Timothy and Paine, Chspin, Museum Basics, Routledge, 1993
  14. Archer, L.B. Systematic Method for Designers, in Cross, N. ed.1984. Developments in Design Methodology, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. 1984
  15. Braa, K. Beyond Formal Quality in Information Systems Design. PhD Dissertation. University of Oslo. 1995
  16. Cross, N. Developments in Design Methodology. Chichester : JohnWiley & Sons. 1984
  17. urry. racing care designer. Design Studies. 17, 1996
  18. Darke, J.. The primary generator and the design process. Design Studies. 1. 1979
  19. Gray, C. and Pirie, I. 'Artistic' research procedure: Research at theedge of chaos?' Design Interfaces Conference Proceedings Vol. 3, Design Theory Design Education. 1995
  20. Hinnells, M. Environmental factors in products: how to gather theevidence? Design Studies. 1993
  21. Jones, C.J. PhD Research in Design. DRS_NEWS. 58. 1997
  22. Jones, C.J. Design Methods. 2nd edit. New York : Van Nostrand Reinhold., 1992
  23. Lord, Barry & Lord Dexter, The Manual of Museum Exhibition, Altamira Press, 2002
  24. Louis Rosenfeld, Information Architecture for the World Wide Web, 1999
  25. Stenmark, D. Collaborative aspects of information retrieval tools:Summarising three action case studies. in Svensson, L., et al.Proceedings of IRIS 23. Laboratorium for Interaction Technology. University of Trollhattan Uddevalla. 2000
  26. Ughes, J. and Wood-Happer, T. Systerns development as a researchact. Journal of Information Technology. 1999