DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Response Modification Factors of Inverted V-type Special Concentrically Braced Frames

역V형 특수가새골조의 반응수정계수

  • 김진구 (성균관대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 남광희 (성균관대학교 건축공학과)
  • Published : 2004.02.01

Abstract

The overstrength factor and the ductility factor are the two important factors that determine response modification factors used in current seismic codes, In this paper the overstrength and ductility factors of special concentric braced frames are determined by performing pushover analysis of model structures with various stories and span lengths. and by using those factors the response modification factors are obtained. According to the analysis results. the overstrength and the ductility factors are larger than the values proposed by the codes in low-rise structures. and the opposite is true in medium to high-rise structures, It is also found that the factors increase as the height of structures decreases and the span length increases.

초과강도계수와 연성계수는 현행 내진기준에서 사용되는 반응수정계수를 결정하기 위한 두 가지 중요한 계수이다. 본 논문에서는 다양한 층수 및 경간을 갖는 역V형 특수 중심가새골조의 비선형 정적 해석을 수행하여 초과강도계수와 연성계수를 구하고 이를 이용하여 반응 수정계수를 산정하였다. 해석결과에 따르면 저층 구조물의 경우 IBC-2000에서 제시한 값보다 큰 반응수정계수 값을 가지며, 중층 이상의 경우 기준에서 제시한 값보다 작은 값으로 나타났다. 또한 초과강도계수와 연성계수는 구조물의 높이가 감소할수록, 스팬의 길이가 증가할수록 증가하는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. ATC, "Tentative provisions for the development of seismic regulations for buildings," ATC-3-06, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California, 1978, pp. 45-53.
  2. ATC, "Structural response modification factors," ATC-19, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California, 1995, pp. 5-32.
  3. ATC, "A critical review of current approaches to earthquake-resistant design," ATC-34, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California, 1995, pp. 31-36.
  4. Osteraas, J. D., "Strength and ductility considerations in seismic design," PHD Dissertation Stanford University, Stanford, California, 1990.
  5. Uang, C. M., "Establishing $R(or\;R_w)$ and $C_d$ factors for building seismic provisions," Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 119, No. 1, 1991, pp. 19-28. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:1(19)
  6. Vayas, I. and Spiliopoulos, A., "Ductility and overstrength of moment frames," SDSS, Stability and Ductility of Steel Structures, 1999, pp. 439-446.
  7. Balendra, T. and Huang, X., "Overstrength and ductility factors for steel frames designed according to BS 5950," Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 129, No. 8, 2003, pp. 1019-1035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:8(1019)
  8. AISC, Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, AISC, Chicago, IL, 2002.
  9. ICC, International Building Code, International Code Council, 2000.
  10. Prakash, V., Powell, G. H., and Campbell, S., DRAIN-2DX, Static and Dynamic Analysis of Plane Structure, NISEE, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 1993.
  11. BSSC, "NEHRP Commentary on The Guidelines for The Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings," FEMA-274, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 1997.
  12. BSSC, "Prestandard and Commentary for The Seismic Rehabilitation of Building," FEMA-356, Federal Emer gency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 2000.
  13. SEAOC, Recommended Lateral Force Requirements and Commentary, SEAOC Blue Book, Structural Engineers Association of California, 1997.
  14. Elnashai, A. S. and Mwafy, A. M., "Overstrength and force reduction factors of multistorey reinforced-concrete building," The Structural Design of Tall Buildings, Vol. 11, No. 5, 2002, pp. 329-351. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.204
  15. Newmark, N. M. and Hall, W. J., Earthquake spectra and Design, EERI Monograph Series, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, 1982.
  16. Miranda, E. and Bertero, V. V., "Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake-resistant design," Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1994, pp. 357-379. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585778