Growth Characteristics of Kentucky Bluegrass on Different Rootzone Foundations

지반 유형에 따른 켄터키 블루그래스의 생육특성

  • Published : 2004.02.01

Abstract

A turfgrass rootzone foundation is one of the important iufluences on the growth of cool-season turfgrass such as Kentucky bluegrass, which is usually grown on korean golf courses and athletic fields in Korea. This study was carried out to evaluate the growth of Kentucky bluegrass on 4 types of turfgrass root-zone foundations: a 2cm thickness of Sand 90%+Peat humus 8%+Zeolite 2% mixture on a subsoil base (C), a 20cm thickness of Sand 90%+Peat humus 8%+Zeolite 2% mixture (S), a 20cm thickness of Sand 45%+fine sand(a sort of Bomyungsa) 45%+Peat humus 8%+Zeolite 2% mixture (S+F), and a 20cm thickness of Sand 45%+fine sand(a sort of Bomyungsa) 45%+Peat humus 8%+Zeolite 2% mixture on a 20cm thick drainage layer (S+F(G)). Visual ratings of Kentucky bluegrass on the C foundation were low throughout the experiment when compared to S, S+F, and S+F(G) foundations, which contained high contents of sand with a high water infiltration rate. However, poor growth of Kentucky bluegrass in the summer of 1991 on the S foundation was likely to be caused by a too high water infiltration rate (185.8cm/hr). The growth of Kentucky bluegrass on the S+F(G) was good while the growth was a little weak at the developing stage on the S +F foundation. If the cost had to be considered when constructing golf courses and athletic fields, The S+F foundation without the drainage layer would be the best choice in terms of low cost and good quality of Kentucky bluegrass compared to the S+F(G). In this result, the infiltration rate was regarded as the most influential factor to the growth of Kentucky bluegrass on rootzone foundations.

Keywords

References

  1. 한국조경학회지 v.28 no.2 스포츠 그라운드에 적합한 식재지반과 잔디 초종에 관한 연구 심상렬;정대영;김경남
  2. 한국조경학회지 v.30 no.1 축국경기장 토양의 물리적 특성과 잔디 마모특성 심상렬;정대영
  3. 한국조경학회지 v.30 no.2 축구경기장의 잔디초종 선정에 관한 연구 심상렬;정대영
  4. 造園雜誌 v.40 no.3 芝生地の收容力に關する基礎的硏究 近藤三雄;小澤知雄
  5. Turfgrass: science and culture Beard,J.B.
  6. Agron.J. v.62 Evaluating sands for athletic turf Bingaman,D.E.;H.Kohnke. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1970.00021962006200040010x
  7. Agron. J. v.67 Physical characteristics of soil mixtures used for golf green construction Brown.K.W.;R.L.Duble https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1975.00021962006700050016x
  8. Rationale for the Revisions of the USGA Green Construction Specifications Norman,W;Hummel,Jr.
  9. Soil Sci Soc. Am. J. v.43 Sand content of sand-soil-peat mixture for turfgarass Tayor,D.H.;G.R.Blake https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1979.03615995004300020032x
  10. Turfgrass Management Turgeon,A.J.
  11. USGA Green Section Record no.March;April USGA Recommendations for a Method of Putting Green Construction USGA Green Section Staff
  12. Providing Results of National Testing of all Major Turfgrass Species