Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

MARGINAL MICROLEAKAGE OF SINGLE STEP ADHESIVES

단일 단계 접착제의 변연 미세누출

  • Cho, Young-Gon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Jeong, Jin-Ho (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Ki, Young-Jae (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Choi, Hee-Young (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Jin, Cheul-Hee (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Yoo, Sang-Hoon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Uk (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Park, Byung-Cheul (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 조영곤 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 정진호 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 기영재 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 최희영 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 진철희 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 유상훈 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 김종욱 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 박병철 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실)
  • Published : 2004.03.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study evaluated the marginal microleakage of five single step adhesives. Class V cavity preparations with occlusal margins in enamel and gingival margins in dentin were prepared on both buccal and lingual surfaces of extracted human molar teeth. Prepared teeth were randomly divided into five groups and restored using one of the single step adhesives and composite resins：Prompt L-Pop/Filtek Z-250 (Group 1), AQ Bond/Metafil CX (Group 2), One-Up Bond F/Palfique Toughwell (Group 3). Futurabond/Admira (Group 4), Xeno III/Spectrum TPH (Group 5). The restored teeth were thermocycled. Microleakage was assessed by dye penetration using 2% methylene blue dye solution. The teeth were bisected buccolingually and evaluated for microleakage under steromicroscope. The data were statistically analysed by Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney tests. The results of this study were as follows：1. Microleakage of enamel margins in group 3 was statistically higher than that in groups 1, 2, 4, 5 (p < 0.05). 2. Microleakage of dentin margins in group 1 was statistically higher than that in groups 2, 5, and that in group 3 was statistically higher than that in groups 2, 4, 5 (p < 0.05). 3. Dentin marginal microleakage was higher than enamel marginal microleakage in all experimental groups. In conclusion, Prompt L-Pop showed the least leakage at enamel margin, and AQ Bond showed at dentin margin in this study. Marginal miroleakage in dentin was higher than that in enamel.

Keywords

References

  1. Amaral CM, Hara AT, Fimenta LAF, Rodrigues AL. Microleakage of hydrophilic adhesive systems in class V composite restorations. Am J Dent 14:31 33, 2001
  2. Gladys S, Meerbeek BV, Lambrechts P,Vanherle G. Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials. Am J Dent 14:170 176, 2001
  3. Aguiar FHB, Santos AJS, Groppo FC, Lovadino JR, Quantititive evaluation of marginal leakage of two resin composite restorations using two filling techniques. Oper Dent 27:475 479, 2002
  4. Gagliardi RM, Aveelar RP. Evaluation of micrpleakage using different bonding agents. Oper Dent 28:582 586, 2002
  5. Hannig M, Fu B. Effect of air abrasion and resin com posite on microleakage of class V restorations bonded with self etching primers. J Adhesive Dent 3:265 272, 2001
  6. Frankenberger R, Perdigao J , Rosa BT, Lopes M. 'No bottle' vs multi bottle' dentin adhesive a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 17:373 380, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00084-1
  7. Inoue S, Meerbeek BV, Vargas M, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesion mechanism of self etching adhesives. Advanced Adhesive Dentistry 3rd International Kuraray symposium, 131 148, 1999
  8. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas P, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dernt 28:215 235, 2003
  9. Swift EJ, Perdigao J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and state of the art. Quintessence Int 26:167 173, 1995
  10. Balooch M, Wu Magidi IC, Balazs A, Lundkvist AS, Marshall SJ. Marshall GW, Siekhaus WJ, Kinney JH. Viscoelastic properties of demineralized human dentin measured in water with an atomic force microscope (AFM) based indentation. J Biomed Res 40:539 544, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980615)40:4<539::AID-JBM4>3.0.CO;2-G
  11. Walshaw PR, McComb D, Clinical considerations for optimal dentin bonding. Quintessence Int 27:619 625, 1996
  12. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Dentin permeability and adhesion. J Dent Res 25:355 372, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00057-7
  13. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 17:296 308, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00087-7
  14. Gordan VV, Vargas MA, Cobb DS, Denehy GE: Evaluation of adhesive systems using acidic primers Am J Dent 10:219 223, 1997
  15. Miyazaki M, Iwasaki K, Onose H, Moore BK: Enamel and deltin bond strengths of single application bonding systems. Am J Dent 14:361 366, 2001
  16. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 26:120, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00070-X
  17. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petchelt A. Fatigue behaviour of different dentin adhesives. Dent Mater14:329 338, 1999
  18. Opdam NJM, Roesters JJM, Feilzer AJ. Verdonschot EH. Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo. J Dent 26:555 562, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00042-0
  19. Tells PDS, Machado MAAM, Nor JE. SEM study of a self etching primer adhesive system used for dentin bonding in primary and permanent teeth. Pediat Dent 23:315 320, 2001
  20. Nakabayashi N, Saimi Y. Bonding to intact dentin. J Dent Res 75:1706 1715,1996 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345960750091401
  21. Itthagarun A, Tay FR. Self contamination of deep dentin by dentinal fluid. Am J Dent 13:195 200, 2000
  22. Brackett WW, Covey DA, Germain HA. One year clinical performance of a self etching adhesive in class V resin composites cured by two methods. Oper Dent 27:218 222, 2002
  23. Croll TP: Self etching adhesive system for resin bonding. J Dent Child 176 181, 2000
  24. Perdigao J, Frankenberger R, Rosa RT. New trends in dentin/enamal adhesion. Am J Dent 13:25 30, 2000
  25. Sonoda H, Sasafuchi Y, Kitasako Y, Arakawa M, Otsuki M, Tagami J. Pulpal response to a fluoride releasing all in one resin bonding system. Oper Dent 27:271 277, 2002
  26. Ohno H, Kimura M, Fuchigami S, Oguri M: Dental composition. United states patent number 5,739,177; April 14, 1998
  27. Kleter GA, Damen JJM, Everts V, Niehof J, Ten Cate JM. The influence of the organic matrix on demineralization of bovine root dentin in vitro. J Dent Res 73:1523 1529, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345940730090701
  28. Nunes MF, Perdigao J, Rosa BT: The effect of an experimental one application self conditioning adhesives on microleakage. J Dent Res 78:306 (abstract no. 1602), 1999
  29. Rosa BT, Perdigao J. Bond strengths of nonrinsing adhesives. Quintessence Int 31:353 358, 2000
  30. Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The effect of load cycling on the nanoleakage of dentin bonding systems, Dent Mater 18(2):111 119, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00029-X
  31. Applequist EA, Meiers JC. Effect of bulk insertion, prepolymerized resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int 4:253 258, 1996
  32. Davidson CL, De Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The compositon between the composite dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 63:1396 1399, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630121101
  33. Mehl A, Hickel R, KunZelmann KH. Physical properties and gap formation of light cured composites with and without: softstart polymerization. J Dent 25:321 330，1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00044-9
  34. Yazici AR, Baseren M, Dayangac B. The effect of flow able resin . Oper Dent 28 :42 46, 2003
  35. Ferrari M, Garcia Godoy F. Sealing ability of new generation adhesive restorative materials places on virtal teeth. Am J Dent 15:117128, 2002
  36. Hofmann N, Siebrecht C, Hugo B, Klaiber B. Influence of curing methods and materials on the marginal seal of class V composite restorations in vitro. Oper Dent 28(2):160 167, 2003
  37. Pontes DG, Melo AT, Monnerat AF. Microleakage of new all in one adhesive systems on dentinal and enamel margins. Quintessence Int 33:136 139, 2002
  38. Barnes DM, McDonald NJ, Thompson VP, Blank LW, Shires PJ. Microleakage in facial and lingual class 5 composite restorations: A comparison. Oper Dent 19:133 137, 1994
  39. Pradelle Plasse N, Nechad S, Tavernier B, Colon P. Effect of dentin adhesives on the enamel dentin/com posite interfacial microleakage. Am J Dent 14:344 348, 2001
  40. Tay FR, King NM, Suh BI, Pashley DH. Effect of delayed activation of light cured resin composite on bonding of all in one adhesives. J Adhesive Dent 3:207 225, 2001
  41. Hasegawa T, Manabe A, Itoh K, Wakumoto S. Investigation of self etching dentin primers. Dent Mater 5:408 410, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(89)90110-3
  42. Swift EJ, Bayne SC, Shear bond strength of a new one bottIe dentin adhesive. Am J Dent 4:184 188, 1997
  43. Kubo S, Yokota H, Sata Y, Hayashi Y. Microleakage of self etching primers after thermal and flexural load cycling. Am J Dent 14:163 169, 2001
  44. Tulunoglu O, Uctash M, Alaoam A, Omurlu H. Microleakage of light cured resin and resin modified glass ionomer detin bonding agents applied with cocure vs pre cure technique. Oper Dent 25:292 298, 2000
  45. Santini A, Plasschaert AJM, Mitchell S. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self etching dentin bonding agents. Am J Dent 14:132 136, 2001

Cited by

  1. Microtensile bond strength of single step adhesives to dentin vol.30, pp.4, 2005, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2005.30.4.312
  2. Comparative bond strength of single step adhesives to different dentinal depths vol.30, pp.4, 2005, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2005.30.4.319