DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Performance Evaluation of Karan Fries and Karan Swiss Cattle under Closed Breeding System

  • Singh, M.K. (National Dairy Research Institute) ;
  • Gurnani, M. (National Dairy Research Institute)
  • Received : 2002.07.22
  • Accepted : 2003.05.09
  • Published : 2004.01.01

Abstract

The 490 and 380 performance records of Karan Fries and Karan Swiss cows developed through crossbreeding followed by inter-se mating were evaluated for production, reproduction performance and disposal rate. Duration of study (1982-92) was grouped into five periods (1982-83; 1984-85; 1986-87; 1988-89; 1990-92) and each year was divided into four seasons (Winter: Dec.-Jan.; Spring: Feb.-March; Summer: April-June; Rainy: July-Sept.; Autumn: Oct.-Nov). Data were also classified according to sire and level of inbreeding. The least squares means of FLY (first lactation yield -305 days), FLL (first lactation length), FSP (first service period), FDP (first dry period), FCI (first calving interval ), MY/FLL (milk yield per day of first lactation length), MY/FCI (milk yield per day of first calving interval), EBV (expected breeding value) and EBE (expected breeding efficiency) were $3,173{\pm}82$ kg, $34611{\pm}$days, $143{\pm}11$ days, $75{\pm}6$ days, $423{\pm}11$ days, $10.6{\pm}0.2$ kg, $8.9{\pm}0.2$ kg, $3,380{\pm}26$ kg, and $88.2{\pm}1.3$% respectively in Karan Fries. Corresponding estimates in Karan Swiss cows were $2,616{\pm}82$ kg, $328{\pm}8$ days, $148{\pm}12$ days, $103{\pm}9$ days, $435{\pm}13$ days, $8.9{\pm}0.2$ kg, $7.2{\pm}0.3$ kg, $2,924{\pm38}$ kg and $86.0{\pm}3.8$% respectively. The effect of sire was significant on FLY, MY/FLL, MY/FCI and EBV in both the herd (p<0.01). The 10 and 15% sires showed superiority (FLY) over herd average of 11 and 7% in Karan Fries and 32 and 21% in Karan Swiss cattle respectively. Inbreeding has adversely and significantly (p<0.05) affected the FLY, MY/FLL, MY/FCI and survivability of Karan Fries females; FDP and disposal through culling of Karan Swiss heifers. The Karan Fries heifers with inbreeding above 12.5% performed 16% lower FLY to herd average. The effect of season of calving was significant on FLL, FSP and FCI (p<0.05) in Karan Fries. Summer calvers ($361{\pm}12$) were have higher lactation length and autumn calvers ($329{\pm}14$) had minimum. Period of calving significantly influenced the FSP, FCI, MY/FLL and MY/FCI in Karan Fries and FLY, MY/FLL and MY/FCI in Karan Swiss. Production efficiency traits in Karan Fries herd witnessed higher yield in the last two periods whereas, Karan Swiss heifers showed fluctuating performance. The findings suggested judicious use of available genetic variability, keeping of inbreeding under safer level and managemental interventions for the consistent improvement of both herds.

Keywords

References

  1. Arora, C. L., R. A. Singhal, R. C. Garg, R. N. Singh and A. Singh. 1993. Comparative performance of 5/8 interbred Frieswal and straight 5/8 crossbred cows. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 63:348-349.
  2. Becker, W. A. 1986. Manual of quantitative genetics. Washington State University, Pullman, USA.
  3. Chaudhary, K. B., D. P. Deshmukh and K. S. Deshpande. 1995. Genetic studies on reproductive traits in Jersey, Sahiwal and Jersey x Sahiwal crossbreds. Indian J. Dairy Sci. 48:172-173.
  4. Dutt, T., B. Bhushan, B. B. Srivastava and P. N. Bhat. 1998. Genetic evaluation of F1, F2 and F3 crosses of Hariana with Friesian, Swiss and Jersey. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 11:470-474.
  5. Gurnani, M., B. K. Joshi and R. Nagarcenkar. 1986b. Development of Karan Swiss cattle at NDRI, Karnal. Dairy information Bulletin. II. 9:1-2.
  6. Gurnani, M., R. K Sethi and R. Nagarcenkar. 1986a. Development of Karan Fries cattle at NDRI, Karnal. Dairy information Bulletin. III. 9:1-2
  7. Gurnani, M., D. S. Bhatnagar and D. Sundaresan. 1971. Incidence of inbreeding and its effect on some economic traits in Tharparkar herd at NDRI. Indian J. Dairy Sci. 24:217-222.
  8. Harvey, W. R. 1975. Least-squares analysis of data with unequal subclass numbers. A.R.S. 20:1-8, USDA, Washington, DC.
  9. Jadhav, K. L., V. N. Tripathi and M. M. Kale. 1991. Performance of crossbred cows for production and reproduction traits in different production level groups. Indian J. Dairy Sci. 45:620-622.
  10. Khanna, A. S., A. S. Kanaujia and D. S. Balaine. 1979. Inbreeding relationship between coefficient of inbreeding and production traits. Indian J. Dairy Sci. 32:151-155.
  11. Kramer, C. Y. 1957. Extension of multiple range tests to group correlated adjusted means. Biometrics. 13:13-18. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001898
  12. Kumar, S. 1992. Multiple trait sire evaluation with production and categorical traits in crossbred cattle. Ph.D. Thesis, National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal.
  13. Milglior, F., B. Szkotnicki and E. B. Burnside. 1992. Analysis of levels of inbreeding and inbreeding depression. J. Dairy Sci. 75:1112-1118.
  14. Narang, R., Y. P. Thakur, N. K. Manuja, S. Katoch and K. Gupta. 2001. First lactation performance of different Holstein Friesian${\times}$Sahiwal grades at Military Dairy Farms. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 71:580-582.
  15. Raheja, K. L. 1994. Comparative evaluation of Friesian-Sahiwal and Friesian-Hariana halfbreds at different military dairy farms. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 64:373-377.
  16. Reddy, K. M. and R. Nagarcenkar. 1988. Studies on production traits in Sahiwal cattle. Indian J. Dairy Sci. 41:298-311.
  17. Singh, Kuldeep., A. S. Khana and A. S. Kanaujia. 2000. Factors affecting lactation performance and persistency in crossbred cattle. Indian J. Dairy Sci. 53:354-360.
  18. Singh, M. K. and M. Gurnani. 2003. Factors affecting disposal trends in corssbred cattle to closed organized farm. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 73:296-299.
  19. Singh, S. K. and R. Nagarcenkar. 1997. Factors affecting milk yield and lactation length in Sahiwal cows. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 67:989-992.
  20. Singh, R. B. 1992. Genetic evaluation of Sahiwal bulls on the basis of daughters’ multiple traits under selection. Ph.D. Thesis, National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal.
  21. Srinivas, B. and M. Gurnani. 1981. Incidence of inbreeding and its effect on some traits of Sahiwal cattle. Indian J. Dairy Sci.34:8-15.
  22. Thompson, J. R., R. W. Everett and N. L. Hammerschmidt. 2000. Effects of inbreeding on production and survival in Holsteins. J. Anim. Sci. 83:1856-64.
  23. Wilcox, C. T., K. D. Pfan and J. W. Bartlet. 1957. An investigation of the inheritance of female reproductive performance and longevity and their interrelationship within a Holstein Friesian herd. J. Dairy Sci. 40:924-947.
  24. Wright, S. 1922. Coefficient of inbreeding and relationship. American Naturalist 56:330-38.

Cited by

  1. Carotenoids from Rhodotorula and Phaffia: yeasts of biotechnological importance vol.36, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-008-0492-9
  2. Production and optimization of carotenoid-enriched dried distiller’s grains with solubles by Phaffia rhodozyma and Sporobolomyces roseus fermentation of whole stillage vol.37, pp.11, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-010-0765-y
  3. Breeding and conservation programmes for Sahiwal cattle genetic resources in the tropics: a review vol.49, pp.2078-6344, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1017/S2078633611000336
  4. locus does not affect the fertility of crossbred bulls but some of the CTCF binding sites could be potentially important vol.81, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.22303
  5. Inbreeding Levels and Pedigree Structure of Landrace, Yorkshire and Duroc Populations of Major Swine Breeding Farms in Republic of Korea vol.19, pp.9, 2004, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.1217
  6. 국내 두록 품종의 근교수준 및 유효집단 크기 추정 vol.41, pp.1, 2004, https://doi.org/10.7744/cnujas.2014.41.1.041
  7. Effective Population Size using Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Information in Korean Native Black Goat vol.54, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.14397/jals.2020.54.1.45
  8. Genome­wide expression analysis of the heat stress response in dermal fibroblasts of Tharparkar (zebu) and Karan-Fries (zebu × taurine) cattle vol.25, pp.2, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12192-020-01076-2