한국인 정상교합자의 하악 치열궁 형태

Mandibular Clinical Arch Forms in Koreans with Normal Occlusions

  • 윤영국 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 임상치과학대학원) ;
  • 국윤아 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 임상치과학대학원) ;
  • 김성훈 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 임상치과학대학원) ;
  • 모성서 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 임상치과학대학원) ;
  • 차경석 (단국대학교 치과대학 교정학교실) ;
  • 김정기 (전북대학교 치과대학 교정학교실 및 구강생체과학연구) ;
  • 태기출 (원광대학교 치과대학 교정학교실)
  • Yun, Young-Kuk (Graduate School of Clinical Dental Science, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Kook, Yoon-Ah (Department of Orthodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dental Science, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Hoon (Department of Orthodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dental Science, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Mo, Sung-Seo (Department of Orthodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dental Science, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Cha, Kyung-Suk (Department of Orthodontics, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Ghee (Department of Orthodontics, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Tae, Ki-Chul (Department of Orthodontics, Wonkwang University)
  • 발행 : 2004.12.01

초록

본 연구의 목적은 한국인 정상교합자에서 하악치열궁의 형태적 차이를 알아보고자 하였다. 한국인 102명의 정상교합자를 대상으로 하악 모형의 교합면을 복사한 후 13개의 접촉점중에서 가장 협측으로 위치한 부분을 digitize하였고 각 치아의 브라켓위치에 해당하는점을 하악치아의 두께에 의거하여 4개의 선계측과 2개의 비율을 측정하였다. 치열궁의 형태를 square, ovoid, tapered from으로 분류하여 그 빈도를 남녀성별에 따라 비교한 결과 특이한 차이점을 보이 지 않았으나 대구치간 폭경에서는 남녀 성별의 차이를 보였다. 정상교합자에서 치열궁 형태분포는 ovoid, square, tapered순 이었고 tapered arch from은 $10\%$미만이었다. 치열궁 형태의 빈도분포에 있어서 남녀간의 차이는 없었다.

The purpose of this study was to clarify morphologic characteristics between mandibular clinical arch forms in Koreans with normal occlusions. The study included data from 102 Koreans. The most facial portion of 13 proximal contact areas was digitized from photocopied images of the mandibular dental arches. Clinical bracket points were calculated for each tooth based on mandibular tooth thickness data. Four linear and two proportional measurements were taken. The dental arches were classified into ovoid, square and tapered forms. The frequency distributions of the three mandibular arch form classifications were determined and compared between male and female subjects. No significant differences in arch form size were found between the sexes. However, there were a few differences in molar width. It was useful to classify mandibular clinical arch forms present in normal occlusion samples into ovoid, square and tapered categories. The frequency of the ovoid form was the highest, and that of the square form was the second highest. The tapered arch form was found in less than 10 percent of subjects. No significant differences in their frequency distributions and dimensions were shown between males and females.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Felton JM, Sinclair PM, Jones DL, Alexander RG. A computerized analysis of theshape andstability of mandibular arch form. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;92:478-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(87)90229-0
  2. De La Cruz A, Sampson P, Little RM, Artun J, Shapiro PA. Long term change in arch form after orthodontic treatment and retention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:518-30 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70119-2
  3. McLaughlin RP, Bennett JC. Arch form considerations for stability andesthetics. Rev Esp Orthod 2000;29:46-63
  4. Shapiro PA. Mandibular arch form and dimension. Am J Orthod 1974;66:58-70 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(74)90193-6
  5. Raberin M, Laumon B, Martin J, Brunner F. Dimensions andform of dental arches in subjects with normal occlusions. AmJ Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104:67-72 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(93)70029-N
  6. Currier JH. A computerized geometric analysis of human dental arch. Am J Orthod 1969;56:164-79 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(69)90232-2
  7. White LW. Individualized ideal arches. J Clin Orthod 1978;12:779-87
  8. Robertt JH. Segment concept in arch pattern design. AmJ Orthod 1980;77:355-67 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(80)90102-5
  9. Andrews LF. The sixkeys to occlusion. Am J Orthod 1972;62:296-309 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(72)90268-0
  10. Nojima K, McLaughlin RP, Isshiki Y, Sinclair PM. A comparative study of Caucasian andJapanese mandibular clinical arch forms. Angle Orthod 2001 ;71 :195-200
  11. Kwon YC, Sung JO, Kwon OW, Sung JH.The dental arch form in normal occlusion. Korea J Orthod 1989;19: 95-105
  12. Kim SC. A study on the configurations of Korean normal dental arches forpreformed arch wire. Korea J Orthod 1984;14:93-100
  13. Nam JH, Lee KS. A study pf mandibular dental arch form of the Korean with normal occlusion. Korea J Orthod 1996:26:535-65
  14. Lee YC, Park YC. A study on the dental arch by occlusogram in normal occlusion. Korea J Orthod 1987;17:279-86
  15. Fujita K, Takada K, QianRong G, Shibata T. Patteming of human dental arch wire blanks using a vector quantization algorithm. Angle Orthod 2002;72:285-94
  16. Korean orthodontic association committee for malocclusion report: Korean adult normal occlusion cephalometric measurements. Seoul Korea 1997
  17. Andrews LF. Straight Wire-The concept and appliance. San Diego, Calif: LAWells Co;1989
  18. Little RM, Wallen TR, Riedel RA. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment. First premolar extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1981 ;80:349-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(81)90171-8
  19. Braun S. Hnat WP, Leschinsky R, Legan HL. An evaluation of the shape of some popular nickel titanium alloy preformed arch wires. AmJ Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:1-12 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70297-0
  20. Lee SJ. Korean mandibular clinical dental arch forms with malocclusions. master of science thesis, The Catholic University of Korea 2003