The korean journal of orthodontics (대한치과교정학회지)

The Korean Association Of Orthodontists (대한치과교정학회)
권호 표지

Effects of light direction and exposure times of plasma arc light on shear bond strength of metal brackets

Plasma arc light를 이용한 금속 브라켓의 부착시 광조사 방향과 중합시간이 전단결합강도에 미치는 영향

  • Roh, Sang-Jeong (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Hyun-Jung (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Jeon, Young-Mi (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Institute of Oral Bioscience Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Ghee (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Institute of Oral Bioscience Chonbuk National University)
  • 노상정 (전북대학교 치과대학 교정학교실) ;
  • 이현정 (전북대학교 치과대학 교정학교실) ;
  • 전영미 (전북대학교 치과대학 교정학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 김정기 (전북대학교 치과대학 교정학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소)
  • Published : 2004.10.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of different light direction exposure times and setting times when using plasma arc light on shear bond strength of metal brackets. 240 extracted human premolars were randomly assigned to one of 16 groups Standardized brackets were bonded to enamel using different light curing units (Plasma arc light and Halogen light), exposure times (Plasma arc light 2. 4, 6 seconds and Halogen light 20 seconds). and light directions [Vertical direction [V] and Oblique direction [O]). 8 groups were tested after 5 minutes and the remaining 8 groups after 24 hours. The metal brackets were bonded with Transbond XT. Shear bond strength was measured by a universal testing machine. The results were as fellows: There were as differences between the shear bond strengths of the Vertical groups (V) and Oblique groups (O). regardless of exposure times and types of light curing units (p>0.05). The shear bond strength of the group with 2 seconds of plasma light were significantly lower than other exposure time groups (P<0.05). The shear bond strength tested after 5 minutes was lower than after 24 hours (p<0.05) The Adhesive Remment Index (ARI) score showed no statistically significant difference among the different groups. The results of this study suggested that the light direction of plasma arc light had no influence on the shear bond strength of metal brackets to enamel. and exposure times more than 4 seconds produced shear bond strengths similar to those Produced with a conventional halogen curing light.

본 연구는 Plasma arc light를 이용하여 금속 브라켓의 부착시 광조사 방향, 중합시간 그리고 경화시간이 전단결합강도에 미치는 영향을 평가하기 위해서 시행되었다. 240개의 발거된 소구츠를 16군으로 나눈 후. 광중합기(Plasma arc light와 Halogen light), 중합시간(Plasma arc light 2. 4. 6초와 Halogen light 20초). 그리고 광조사 방향(Vertical 방향과 Oblique 방향)을 다르게 하여 브라켓을 부착하였다. 광증합 접착제는 Transbond XT를 이용하였으며 브라켓 부착 후 5분과 24시간 후에 만능물성시험기를 이용하여 전단결합강도를 측정하였다. 결과는 다음과 같다. 광중합기의 종류와 중합시간에 관계없이 Vertical군과 Oblique군간의 전단결합강도는 유의한 차이가 없었다.(p>0.05) Plasma arc light를 이용하여 2초 동안 광중합한 군들의 전단결합강도는 다른 중합시간의 군들보다 현저히 낮았다(P<0.05). 부착 5분 후의 전단결합강도는 24시간 후보다 현저히 낮았다(P<005), ARI 점수는 군들 간에 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 없었다. 이상의 결과는 plasma arc light를 사용한 금속 브라켓의 부착시 광조사 방향은 전단결합강도에 영향을 끼치지 않으며. Halogen light와 유사한 결합강도를 얻기 위해서는 4초 이상의 중합시간이 필요함을 시사한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Buonocore M. Adhesive sealing of pits and fissures for caries preven-tion, with use of ultraviolet light. J Am Dent Assoc 1970;80:324-30 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1970.0061
  2. Buonocore MG, Davila J. Restoration of fractured anterior teeth with ultraviolet-light-polymerized bonding materials:a new technique. J Am Dent Assoc 1973;86:1349-54 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1973.0305
  3. Silverman E, Cohen M, Gianelly AA, Dietz VS. A universal direct handing system for both metal and plastic brackets. Am J Orthod 1972;62(3):236-44 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(72)90264-3
  4. Wang WN, Meng CL. A study of bond strength between light- and self-cured orthodontic resin. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:350-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)80328-2
  5. Birdsell DC, Bannon PJ, Webb RB. Harmful effects of near-ultraviolet radiation used for polymerization of a sealant and a composite resin. J Am Dent Assoc 1977;94:311-4 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1977.0304
  6. Tirtha R, Fan PL, Dennison JB, Powers JM. ln vitro depth of cure of photo-activated composites. J Dent Res 1982;61:1184-7 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345820610101601
  7. Oesterle LJ, Newman SM, Shellhart WC. Rapid curing of bending composite with a xenon plasma arc light. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:610-6 https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.113652
  8. Sfondrini MF, Cacciafesta V, Pistorio A, Sfondrini G. Effects of con-ventional and high-intensity light-curing on enamel shear bond stren-gth of composite resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:30-5 https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.111399
  9. Lalani N, Foley TF, Voth R, Banting D, Mamandras A. Polymerization with the argon laser: curing time and shear bond strength. Angle Orthod 2000;70:28-33
  10. Talbot TQ, Blankenau RJ, Zobitz ME, Weaver AL, Lohse CM, Rebe-llato J. Effect of argon laser irradiation on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets: an in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:274-9 https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2000.106069
  11. Blankenau RJ, Kelsey WP, Powell GL, Shearer GO, Barkmeier WW, Cavel WT. Degree of composite resin polymerization with visible light and argon laser. Am J Dent 1991;4:40-2
  12. Sfondrini MF, Cacciafesta V, Klersy C. Halogen versus high-intensity light-curing of uncoakd and pre-coated brackets: a shear bond stren-gth study. J Orthod 2002;29:45-50 https://doi.org/10.1093/ortho/29.1.45
  13. Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Sfondrini G. A Xenon arc light-curing unit for bonding and bleaching. J Clin Orthod 2000;34:94-96
  14. Ishikawa H, Komori A, Kojima I, Ando F. Orthodontic bracket bon-ding with a plasma-arc light and resin-reinforced glass ionomer cem-ent. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:58-63 https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.115148
  15. 박영철, 유형석, 오영근, 이승연. Plasma arc light를 이용한 bracket 부착시의 전단결합강도와 파절양상의 유형. 대치교정지 2001;31:261-70
  16. Greenlaw R, Way DC, Galil KA. An in vitro evaluation of a visible light-cured resin as an alternative to conventional resin bonding sys-tems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96:214-20 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(89)90458-7
  17. Tavas MA, Watts DC. Bonding of orthodontic brackets by transillu-mination of a light activated composite: an in vitro study. Br J Orthod 1979;6:207-8 https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.6.4.207
  18. King L, Smith RT, Wendt SL Jr, Behrents RG. Bond strengths of lin-gual orthodontic brackets bonded with light-cured composite resins cured by transillwnination. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;91:312-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(87)90172-7
  19. Oesterlc LJ. Shellhart WC. Bracket bond strength with transillumina- tion of a light-activated orthodontic adhesive. Angle Orthod 2001;71:307-11
  20. Jacoby H. Semi-indirect bonded lingual retainer. J Clin Orthod 1989;23:171-5
  21. Behrents RG, Wendt SL, Fox DM, Smith RT, King L.A transillumi-nation technique for lingual bonding. J Clin Orthod 1987;21:324-5
  22. Evans LJ, Peters C, Flickinger C, Talownis L, Dunn W. A comparison of shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets using various light sources, light guides, and cure times. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121:510-5 https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.121558
  23. Odegaard J, Segner D. The use of visible light-curing composites in bonding ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;97:188-93 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)80050-2
  24. 장영일, 이승진. 광중합 접착제로 접착된 금속 브라켓의 전단접착강도에 관한 연구. 대치교정지 1992;22:289-96
  25. Oesterle LJ, Messersmith ML, Devine SM, Ness CF. Light and setting times of visible-light-cured orthodontic adhesive. J Clin Orthod 1995;29:31-6
  26. 최해운, 김정기. 교정용 브라켓 접착부의 피로특성에 관한 실험적 연구. 대치교정지 1995;25:55-72
  27. Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatroent. Am J Orthod 1984;85:333-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90190-8
  28. Harris AM, Joseph VP, Rossouw E. Comparison of shear bond stren-gths of orthodontic resins to ceramic and metal brackets. J Clin Orthod 1990;24:725-8
  29. Lovius BB, Pender N, Hewage S, O'Dowling I, Tomkins A. A clinical trial of a light activated bonding material over an 18 month period, Br J Orthod 1987;14:11-20
  30. Yap AU, Seneviratne C. Influence of light energy density on effecti-veness of composite cure. Oper Dent 2001;26:460-6
  31. Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Coois JW Jr. Effect of light intensity and exposure duration on cure of resin composite. Oper Dent 1994;19:26-32
  32. Reynolds IR, von Fraunhofer JA. Direct bonding of orthodontic atta-chments to teeth:the relation of adhesive bond strength to gauze mesh size. Br J Orthod 1976;3:91-5 https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.3.2.91
  33. McCourt JW, Cooley RL, Barnwell S. Bond strength of light-cure fluoride- releasing base-liners as orthodontic bracket adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100:47-52 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(91)70048-2
  34. Zach L, Cohen G. Pulp response to externally applied heat. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1965;19:515-30 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(65)90015-0
  35. Loney RW, Price RB. Temperature transmission of high-output light-curing units through dentin. Oper Dent 2001;26:516-20
  36. Read MJ. The bonding of orthodontic attachments using a visible light cured adhesive. Br J Orthod 1984;11:16-20 https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.11.1.16