Self-etching Primer를 이용한 교정용 브라켓 부착시 전단결합강도와 파절양상에 관한 비교연구

A comparative study on bond strength and adhesive failure pattern in bracket bonding with self-etching primer

  • 김유경 (단국대학교 치과대학 교정학교실) ;
  • 이진우 (단국대학교 치과대학 교정학교실) ;
  • 차경석 (단국대학교 치과대학 교정학교실)
  • Kim, You-Kyoung (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Lee, Jin-Woo (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Cha, Kyung-Suk (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 발행 : 2004.08.01

초록

본 연구의 목적은 산부식과 전처리 과정을 결합하여 접착 단계를 단순화시킨 self-etching primer의 임상적인 유용성 을 판단하고자, self-etching primer로 브라켓을 접착하는 방법과 기존의 $37\%$ 인산으로 부식하여 접착하는 방법을 사용하여, 광중합시 사용되는 광원 및 브라켓 종류에 따른 전단결합강도와 접착파절양상에 관하여 비교 연구하는 것이다. 사람의 상하악 소구치를 포매하여 만든 시편을 부식 및 전처리 방법에 따라 각각 $37\%$ 인산으로 산부식 후 Transbond XT primer를 사용하여 접착한 군과 Transbond Plus self-etching primer를 사용하여 접착한 군으로, 광원 종류에 따라 가시광선과 plasma arc light을 이용하여 중합한 군으로 나누었고, 브라켓 종류에 따라 금속브라켓과 세라믹 브라켓을 사용하여 접착한 군으로 분류하여 각 군간의 전단결합강도와 접착파절양상을 관찰하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 광원과 브라켓 종류가 동일한 조건일 때, self-etching primer를 사용하여 접착한 군과 XT primer를 사용하여 접착한 군간의 전단결합강도는 통계적으로 유의한 차가 없었다. 2. 금속브라켓을 접착한 경우, 광원과 부식 및 전처리 방법에 따른 전단결합강도는 통계적으로 유의한 차가 없었다. 3. Self-etching primer와 XT primer를 사용하여 접착한 군 모두에서 세라믹 브라켓을 사용하여 접착한 군의 전단결합 강도는 금속브라켓을 사용하여 접착한 군보다 통계적으로 유의하게 컸다(p<0.001). 4. 접착제 잔류지수는 self-etching primer를 사용하여 접착한 군과 XT primer를 사용하여 접착한 군에서 통계적인 유의한 차가 없었으며, 세라믹 브라켓을 사용하여 접착한 군에서 금속브라켓을 사용하여 접착한 군보다 유의하게 커서, 법랑질-레진 접착 계면 부위의 파절이 더 많은 것으로 나타났다. 이상의 결과로 미루어 보아 Transbond Plus self-etching primer를 사용하여 브라켓을 접착하는 것은 적절한 결합강도를 얻으면서도 사용이 간편하고 시술 시간을 단축시킬 수 있으므로 임상적으로 유용할 것으로 판단된다.

A self-etching primer that combines the etchant and primer in one chemical compound saves time and should be mote cost-effective to the clinician and patient. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a self-etching primer by measuring shear bond strengths according to various conditions and observing adhesive failure patterns. For this Investigation, 120 upper and lower premolars extracted for orthodontic purposes were used and randomly divided into six groups of twenty teeth each. Human premolars were embedded in a metal cylinder with orthodontic resin. Metal brackets and ceramic brackets were bonded with XT primer and self-etching primer by means of XT adhesive. Upon curing, plasma arc light and visible light were used. After bonding, the shear bond strength was tested by Instron universal testing machine, and the amount of residual adhesive that remained on the tooth after debonding was measured by stereoscope and assessed with an adhesive remnant index. The results were as fellows: 1. When brackets were bonded, if other conditions remained the same, there was no significant difference in shear bond strength due to the type of primer - either self-etching primer or XT primer. 2. When metal brackets were bonded, there was no significant difference in shear bond strength according to the source of light - plasma arc light or visible light - and type of primer. 3. There was a very significant difference in shear bond strength according to the type of brackets - metal or ceramic brackets. The shear bond strength of ceramic brackets was stronger than metal brackets. 4. When the adhesive failure patterns of metal brackets bonded with self-etching primer were observed by using the adhesive remnant index, the bond failure of the metal bracket occurred more frequently at the bracket-adhesive. The failure of the ceramic bracket, however, occurred more frequently at the enamel-adhesive interface. The adhesive failure patterns of metal brackets bonded with XT primer observed the same patterns. The above results suggest that self-etching primer can be clinically useful for bonding the brackets without fear of a decrease in shear bond strength.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Proffit WR. Contemporary orthodontics. St. Louis: Mosby; 2000. p.397-402
  2. White LW. Glass ionomer cement. J Clin Orthod 1990;17:223-8
  3. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surface. J Dent Res 1955;38:849-53
  4. Newman GV. Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments-progress report. Am J Orthod 1965;51:901-12 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(65)90203-4
  5. Bishara SE, VonWald L, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. Effect of a self-etch primer/adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:621-4 https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.113269
  6. Miller RA. Laboratory and clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer. J Clin Orthod 2001;35:42-5
  7. Lopez JI. Retentive shear strengths of various bonding attachment bases. Am J Orthod 1980;77:669-78 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(80)90158-X
  8. Coreil MN, Mclnnes-Ledoux P, Ledoux WR, Weinberg R. Shear bond strength of four orthodontic systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;97:126-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(90)70085-Q
  9. Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 1984;85:333-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90190-8
  10. Surmont P. Dermant L, Martens L, Moors M. Comparison in shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets between five bonding systems related to different etching times;An in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:414-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(92)70114-P
  11. 박영철, 유형석, 오영근, 이승연. Plasma arc light를 이용한 브라켓 부착시의 전단결합강도와 파절양상의 유형. 대치교정지 2001;31:261-70
  12. 이진우, 박희찬. FUPO를 이용한 광중합 브라켓 부착시 접착 결합강도와 파철양상에 관한 비교 연구. 단국치대논문집 석사학위논문 2001
  13. 차경석, 이진우, 박철완. 친수성 primer를 이용한 교정용 브라켓 접착시 타액 오염 정도에 따른 전단결합강도에 관한 연구. 대치교정지 2002;32:293-300
  14. Alexendre P, Young J, Sandrik JL, Bowman D. Bond strength of three orthodontic adhesives, Am J Orthod 1981;79:653-60 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(81)90357-2
  15. Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1975;2:171-8 https://doi.org/10.1080/0301228X.1975.11743666
  16. 김재혁, 황현식. 브라켓 부착시 레진베이스의 두께에 따른 전단결합강도와 파절양상에 관한 연구. 대치교정지 1998;28:659-68
  17. Keizer S, Ten Cate JM, Arends J. Direct bond of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod 1976;69:318-27 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(76)90079-8
  18. 김 철, 윤영주, 김광원. 광중합형 글래스 아이오노머 시멘트가 교정용 브라켓의 전단결합강도에 미치는 영향. 대치교정지 1997;27:327-34
  19. 이주원, 유동환, 김상철. 세라믹 브라켓과 교정용 접착제에 따른 전단 결합 강도의 비교 연구. 대치교정지 1997;27:315-26
  20. Bishara SE, Fehr DE, Jakobsen JR. A comparative study of the debonding strengths of different ceramic brackets, enamel conditioners, adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104:170-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81007-8
  21. Joseph VP, Rossouw PE. The shear bond strength of stainless steel orthodontic brackets bonded to teeth with orthodontic composite resin and various fissure sealants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:66-71 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(90)70033-9
  22. Moser JB, Marshall GW, Green FP. Direct bonding of polycarbonate orthodontic brackets: An in vitro study, Am J Orthod 1979;75:78-85 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(79)90141-6
  23. Sfondrini MF, Cacciafesta V, Pisterio A, Sfondrini G. Effects of conventional and high-intensity light-curing on enamel shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001:119:30-5
  24. MacColl GA, Rossouw PE, Titley KC, Yamin C. The relationship between bond strength and orthodontic bracket base surface area with conventional and microetched foil-mesh bases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:276-81 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70297-5
  25. Proffit WR, Field HW, Nixon WL. Occlusal forces in normal and long faced adults. J Dent Res 1983;62:566-70 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345830620051201
  26. McCarthy MF, Hondrum SO. Mechanical and bond strength properties of light cured and chemically cured glass ionomer cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994:105:135-41
  27. Odegaard J, Segner D. Shear bond strength of metal brackets compared with a new ceramic bracket. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94:201-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(88)90028-5
  28. Harris AMP, Joseph VP, Rossouw PE. Shear peel bond strength of esthetic orhodontic brakets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;102:215-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81055-8
  29. Gwinnett AJ. A comparison of shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brakets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthod 1988;93:346-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(88)90165-5
  30. O'Brien KD, Watts DC, Read MJ. Residual debris and bond strength-Is there a relationship? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94:222-30
  31. Siomoka LV, Powers JM. In vitro bond strength of treated direct bonding metal bases. Am J Orthod 1985;88:133-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(85)90237-4