PERCEPTION ASSESSMENT OF ESTHETICS OF UPPER ANTERIOR TEETH

상악전치부 심미에 대한 인식도 평가

  • Jung Jae-Hoon (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Oh Sang-Chun (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
  • 정재훈 (원광대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 오상천 (원광대학교 치과대학 보철학교실)
  • Published : 2003.10.01

Abstract

Statement of problem : The beauty has a little different meaning according to a time, culture, and nation. Purpose : This study was undertaken to determine the Korean perception of the altered upper anterior dental esthetics including the lack of symmetry, the midline deviation, the gingival exposure, the inclination of incisal plane, the type of incisal plane, and the type of gingival line. Material and Method : 670 subjects were participated in this survey. A questionnaire accompanied by 12 sets of computer-manipulated images using 3D MAX 4.2 software was used to record the ranking of the geometric preference related to the anterior esthetic discrepancies in three or four degrees of alteration. The statistical significance of the differences between the groups was determined by a one-way ANOVA and a t-test. Results : The results obtained were as follows: 1) The Korean perception of the anterior dental esthetics according to the subjects' occupation, sex, and age was most affected by occupation. 2) The masked image emphasizing the dentition and lips appeared stranger than the non-masked image at the same alteration. 3) The lack of symmetry, which was expressed as a unilateral discoloration of the tooth, showed incongruity in any teeth of the anterior dentition. The incongruity was more severe as the degree occurred closer to the midline. 4) The deviation of midline was showed more severe strangeness as the degree of deviation increased. However, more than half of the subjects did not perceive a deviation of 5mm. 5) During smiling, the exposure of the upper gingiva showed more severe incongruity as the degree of gingival exposure increased. 77% of the subjects perceived strangeness at the gingival exposure of 4.5mm. 6) The inclination of the incisal plane appeared stranger as the degree of inclination increased. 62% of subjects perceived strangeness at the $7.5^{\circ}$ inclination of the incisal plane. 7) The type of incisal plane showed increasing strangeness in the order of convex/downward, straight/horizontal, and concave/upward. 80% of subjects perceived strangeness at concave/upward. 8) The type of gingival line was showed increasing incongruity in the order of the same, a little above, and a little under the zenith of the lateral incisor to the line joining the zenith of the central incisor and the canine. However, less than half the subjects did not perceive strangeness at any alteration of the gingival line. Conclusion : The Korean perception of the upper anterior dental esthetics was different to the westerner's perception in the some respects.

Keywords

References

  1. Rosenstiel SF, Rashid RG. Public preferences for anterior tooth variations: a webbased study. J Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 2002: 14: 97-106
  2. Carlsson GE. Wagner IV, Odman P, et al. An international comparative multicenter study of assessment of dental appearance using computer-aided image manipulation. Int J Prosthodont 1998: 11: 246-254
  3. Brooks LE. Smile-Imaging: The key to more predictable dental esthetics. J Esthetic Dent 1990: 2: 6-16
  4. Goldstein RE, Garber DA Goldstein E, et al. Esthetic update: the changing esthetic dental practice. J Am Dent Assoc 1994: 125: 1447-1456
  5. Lloyd PM. Fixed prosthodontics and esthetic considerations for the older adult. J Prosthet Dent 1994: 72: 525-531
  6. Miller CJ. The smile line as a guide to anterior esthetics. Dent Clin North Am 1989: 33: 157-167
  7. Burstone CJ. Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning. Am J Ortho 1967: 54: 262-272
  8. Lombardi RE. Factors mediating against excellence in dental esthetics. J Prothet Dent 1977: 38: 243-253
  9. Riketts RM. Esthetics, environment, and the law of lip relation. Am J Ortho 1968: 54: 292-302
  10. Rufenacht CR. Fundamentals of esthetics, Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc. 1990: 67-77
  11. Dong JK, Jin TH, Cho HW, Oh SC. The esthetics of the smile: a review of some recent studies. Int J Prosthodont 1999 Jan-Feb: 12(1): 9-19
  12. Kokich VO, Kiyak HA, Shapiro PA. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J esthet Dent 1999: 11: 311-324
  13. Johnston CD, Burden DJ, Stevenson MR. The influence of dental to facial midline discrepancies on dental attractiveness ratings. Eur J Orthod 1999: 21: 517-522
  14. Ahmad I. Geometric considerations in anterior dental aesthetics : restorative principles. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent 1998: 10(7): 813-822
  15. Choi TR. Jin TH, Dong JK. A study on the exposure of maxillary and mandibular central incisor in smiling and physiologic rest position. J Wonkwang Dent Research Inst 1995: 5(1): 371-378
  16. Dong JK, Oh SC, Kim HS, Ju TH. The relationship between MMPI clinical scale and smile score. J Wonkwang Dent Research Inst 1996: 6(1): 41-51
  17. Berland L; Westbrook P. New techniques create a new smile. Dent Today 1998: 17: 70-73
  18. Moley J. The role of cosmetic dentistry in restoring a youthful appearance. J Am Dent Assoc 1999: 130: 1166-1172
  19. 조용진, 얼굴, 한국인의 낯. 사계절. 2000
  20. Yoon ME, Jin TH, Dong JK. A study on the smile in Korean youth, J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1992: 30(2): 259-269
  21. Kim HS, Jin TH, Dong JK. A study on the relation between lip and. teeth at smile in old aged Korean. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1993: 31(4)
  22. Wheeler RC. 'Dental anatomy, Physiology, and Occlusion.' 4th ed. Saunders 1974
  23. Oh SC, Jung JH. Morphology and size of clinical crown of permanent upper anterior teeth in Korean adult. The Journal of Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion 2001: 17(1): 38-42
  24. Brisman AS. Esthetics: comparison of dentists' and patients' concepts. J Am Dent Associ 1980: 100: 345-352
  25. Wagner IV, Carlsson GE, Ekstrand K. etc. A comparative study of assessment of dental appearance by dentists, dental technicians, and laymen using computeraided image manipulation. J Esthetic Dentistry 1996: 8(5): 199-205
  26. Katz RV. Relationships between eight orthodontic indices and oral self-image satisfaction scale. Am J Orthod 1978: 73: 328-334
  27. Lobb WK, Ismail AI, Andrews CL, Spracklin TE. Evaluation of orthodontic treatment using the Dental Aesthetic Index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994: 106: 70-75
  28. Cons NC, Jenny J. Comparing perceptions of dental aesthetics in the USA with those in eleven ethnic groups. lnt Dent J 1994; 44: 489-494
  29. Evans R. Shaw W. Preliminary evaluation of an illustrated scale for rating dental attractiveness. Eur J Orthod 1987; 9: 314-318 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/9.1.314
  30. Padwa BL. Kaiser MO. Kaban LB. Occlusal cant in the frontal plane as a reflection of facial asymmetry. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 55: 811-816 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(97)90338-4
  31. Kokich VG Esthetics and anterior tooth position: an orthodontic perspective. Part I: crown length. J Esthet Den 1993; 5: 19-23 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1993.tb00739.x
  32. Kokich VG. Esthetics and anterior tooth position: an orthodontic perspective. Part II: vertical position. J Esthet Den 1993; 5: 174-178 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1993.tb00774.x
  33. Rosenstiel SF. Robert GR. Preferences of anterior tooth proportion-a web-based study. Journal of Prosthodontics 2000; 9(3): 123-136 https://doi.org/10.1053/jpro.2000.19987
  34. Nanamo S. Behrend DA. Harcourt JK. Angular asymmetries of the human face. Int J Prosthodont 2000; 13(1): 41-46
  35. Frush J. Swissdent technique and procedure manual. Los Angeles: Swissdent Corp. 1971
  36. Golub J. Entire smile pivotal to teeth design. Clin Den 1988; 33-43
  37. Um KY. A study of the relationship of the dental midline to the facial median line. Hanyang University. Master's thesis. 1985
  38. Chiche GJ. Pinault A. Esthetics of anterior fixed prosthodontics. Chicago: Quintessence. 1994
  39. Janzen EK. A balanced smile: a most important treatment objective. Am J Orthod 1977; 72: 359-372 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(77)90349-9