대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제41권6호
  • /
  • Pages.732-746
  • /
  • 2003
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지

A STUDY ON THE ADHESION OF A SOFT LINER CONTAINING 4-META TO THE BASE METAL ALLOY AND ITS VISCOELASTIC PROPERTY

  • Park Hyun-Joo (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim Chang-Whe (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim Yung-Soo (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University)
  • 발행 : 2003.12.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Statement of problem. Soft lining materials, also referred to as tissue conditioning materials, tissue heating materials, relining materials, soft liners or tissue conditioners, were first introduced to dentistry by a plastic manufacturer in 1959. Since the introduction of the materials to the dental field, their material properties have been continually improved through the effort of many researchers. Soft lining materials have become widely accepted, particularly by prosthodontists, because of their numerous clinical advantages and ease of manipulation. Unfortunately, few reports have been issued upon the topic of increasing the bond strength between the base metal alloy used in cast denture bases and PMMA soft liner modified with 4-META, nor upon the pattern of debonding and material change in wet environment like a intra oral situation. Purpose. The purposes of this study were comparing the bond strength between base metal alloy used for the cast denture bases and PMMA soft liner modified with 4-META, and describing the pattern of debonding and material property change in wet environment like the intraoral situation. Material and Methods. This study consisted of four experiments: 1. The in vitro measurement of shear bond strength of the adhesive soft liner. 2. The in vitro measurement of shear bond strength of the adhesive soft liner after 2 weeks of aging. 3. A comparison of debonding patterns. 4. An evaluation the Relation time of modified soft liner. The soft liner used in this study was commercially available as Coe-soft (GC America.IL.,USA), which is provided in forms of powder and liquid. This is a PMMA soft liner commonly used in dental clinics. The metal primer used in this study was 4-META containing primer packed in Meta fast denture base resin (Sun Medical Co., Osaka, Japan). The specimens were formed in a single lap joint desist which is useful for evaluating the apparent shear bond strength of adhesively bonded metal plate by tensile loading. Using the $20{\times}20mm$ transparent grid, percent area of adhesive soft liner remaining on the shear area was calculated to classify the debonding patterns. To evaluate the change of the initial flow of the modified adhesive soft liner, the gelation time was measured with an oscillating rheometer (Haake RS150W/ TC50, Haake Co., Germany). It was a stress control and parallel plate type with the diameter of 35mm. Conclusion. Within the conditions and limitations of this study, the following conclusions were drawn as follows. 1. There was significant increase of bond strength in the 5% 4-META, 10% 4-META containing groups and in the primer coated groups versus the control group(P<0.05). 2. After 2 weeks of aging, no significant increase in bond strength was found except for the group containing 10% 4-META (P<0.05). 3. The gelation times of the modified soft liner were 9.3 minutes for the 5% 4-META containing liner and 11.5 minutes for the 10% 4-META liner. 4. The debonding patterns of the 4-META containing group after 2 weeks of aging were similar to those of immediaely after preparation, but the debonding pattern of the primer group showed more adhesive failure after 2 weeks of aging.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Pound E.Personalized denture procedure; dentist's manual. Anaheim;1973; Dental Corp
  2. C.C.Smith. Method and composition for facilitating dental appliances. United States Patent No.3.060.577.1962
  3. Chase.W.W. Tissue conditioning utilizing dynamic adaptive stress. J Prosthet Dent 1961;11(4);804
  4. E.R.Dootz., A.Koran, RG.Craig. Physical property comparison of 11 soft denture lining materials as a function of accelerated aging. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69(1);114-9
  5. Boucher, Zarb, Bolender et al.. Prosthetic treatment for edentulous patients. St. Louis; CV Mosby 1975;37
  6. P.S. Wright. Compositionand the properties of soft lining materials for acrylic dentures. J Dent 1981;9(3);210-3
  7. Garfield.R.E. An American method for relining metal based prosthesis with acid etched technique. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 51;719
  8. S. Canay, N.Hersek, Tulunoglu, Uzun G. Effect of 4-META adhesive on the bond strength of different metal framework designs and acrylic resins J Oral Rehabil ;1997;24(12);913-9
  9. Tanaka, Nagata, Takeyama et al. 4-META opaque resin; a new resin strongly adhesive to nick-elchromium alloy.J Dent Res 1981;60(9);1697-706
  10. Watanabe, Powers, Loey. In vitro bonding of prosthodontic adhesives to metal alloys. J Dent Res 1988;67;479
  11. Kawano,E.R.Dootz, Koran, RG.Craig. Comparison of bond strength of six soft liner to denture base resin. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68(2);368-71
  12. Ishijama, Kaputo, Mito. Adhesion of resin to casting alloys. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67;445
  13. Barclay CW,williams R.The tesile and shear bond strength of a conventional and a 4- META self cure acrylic resin to various surface finishes of Co-Cr alloy. Eur J Res&Prosth Dent 1994;3(1);5-9
  14. Yoshida K,Tayra Y,SawaseT, Atsuta M.Adhesive primers for bonding Co-Cr alloy to resin. J Oral Rabil 1999;26(6);475
  15. Zurasky J.E. Improved adhesion of denture acrylic resins to base metal alloys. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57;520
  16. Jacobson TE; The significance of adhesive denture base resin. Int J Prosth;1989;2;163-72.Review
  17. Ohkubo C. Okabe T. Shear bond strength of poly methl methacrylate to cast titanium and Co-Cr framework using 5 metal primers. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83(1);50-7
  18. Hyun-Joo Park, Chang-Whe Kim, Yung-Soo Kim. A study on the flexural bond strength of the gold and Co-Cr alloy to the denture base resins. JKAP 2000;38;500
  19. Yukio Miyagawa. New Initiation system for resin polymerization using metal prticles and 4- META. Dent Mater J 2000;19(2);164
  20. Standard test method for apparent shear bond strength of single lap joint adhesively bonded of metal specimens by tesion loading (metal to met-al)D 1002-99;Annual book ASTM standard vol Ol.03
  21. L.Murdford, Curtis, Walter. An investigation of debonding between heat cured PMMA and titanium alloy(Ti-6A1-4V). J Dent 1997;25(5);415-21
  22. Yoshida K, Tayra Y, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of adhesive metal primers on bonding a prosthetic composite resin to metals. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69(4);357-362
  23. GA. Jackley, Plummer KD. Bonding soft reline materials to base metals. J of Prosthodont. 1994;3(1);16-18
  24. D.Brown. Resilient soft liners and tissue conditioners. Br Dent. J;1988;164(1l);357
  25. Yasuda, Sasaki, Shinogoya et al. The interface between metal and resin on the finishing line of Co-Cr dentures. Part 7. a clinical evaluation of 4-META system. J Prosthet Dent 1985;29;761
  26. Sandra Parker, M.Braden. Formulation of tissue conditioners. Biomaterials 1990;11(8);579-84
  27. Danielle Buch. Surface conditions and viscoelastic properties of the denture liner Permaflex Int J Prosth 1995;8(3);285-291
  28. Bryan Ellis, DJ Lamb, McDonald. A study of the composition and diffusion characteristics of a soft liner. J Dent;1979;7(2);133
  29. McCabe. Soft lining materials; Composition and structure. J Oral Rehabil. 1976;3(3);273-78
  30. Standard guide for use of adhesive bonded single lap joint specimen test results ASTM vol 15.06 Designation;D 4896-95 1916;Race St Philadelphia. Pa 19103
  31. Me mordie R, King GE. Evaluation of primers used for bonding silicone to denture base mater-ial. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61(5);636-9
  32. Van Noort, Noroozi, Howard, Cardew. A critique of bond strength measurement. J Dent 1989;17(2);61-7
  33. Mack P.J, Denture soft linings Material available.Aust. Dent. J 1989;34;517
  34. Qudah S. The effect of thermocycling on the hard-ness of soft lining materials. Quintessence 1991;22;575
  35. Al Athel MS, Jagger RG. Effect of test method on the bond strength of a silicone resilient denture lining material. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76(5);535-40
  36. Fowler JA. A comparison bonding strength characteristics between a silicone rubber. silastic 390, and various denture base resin [MScD thesis] Univ. of Texas. 1968.
  37. Anderson, Bennett, Devries. Analysis and testing of adhesive bonds. NewYork academic Press,1977;9-16.157
  38. N.J.A Jepson, McCabe, Storer. Evaluation of the viscoelastic properties of denture soft lining materials. J Dent 1993;21(3);163
  39. Bates.JF. Masticatory function-a review of the lit-erature( II ) Speed of movement of the mandible, rate of chewing and forces developed in chewing. J Oral Rehabil 1975;2;349
  40. Burkhard H. Wolf, Gert.H. Richiter. In vitro testing of the bond between soft materials used for max-illofacial prosthesis and cast titanium. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85;401
  41. Murata H, Shigeto N, Hamada T. Viscoelastic properties of tissue conditioners-stress relaxation test. J Oral Rehabil 1990;17(4);365-75.
  42. Yoeli, Miller, Zeltser. Consistency and softness of soft liners. J Prosthet Dent 1996 ;75(4); 412
  43. R.L Duran, Powers, Craig. Viscoelastic and dynamic properties of soft liners and tissue conditioners. J Dent Res 1979;58;1801
  44. Jae-Ook Lee. Rheology and its application 2001.The Korean academy of rheology
  45. Kook-Heon Cha, Rheometry ; 1999. The Korean academy of rheology
  46. Mc Carthy, Moser. Tissue conditioner as functional impression matrerials. J Oral Rehabil 1978;5(4);357-64.
  47. Braden.M. Tissue conditioner; II .Rheologic properties. J Dent Res 1970:49(3):496-501
  48. Braden.M. Tissue conditioner; I .Composition and structure. J Dent Res 1970;49(1):145-8
  49. Jones DW, Sutow EJ,Graham BS et al. Influence of plasticizer on soft polymer gelation. J Dent Res 1986;65(5);634-42
  50. Murata H, Hamada T, Djulaeha E,Nikawa H.Rheology of tissue conditioner. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79(2);188-99
  51. Murata H, Iwanaga H, Shigeto N, Hamada T. Initial flow of tissue conditioners-influence of composition and structure on. J Oral Rehabil 1993;20(2);177-87
  52. Newsome PR,Basker RM, Bergman B, Glantz PO. The softness and initial flow of temporary soft lining materials. Acta Odontol Scand 1988;46(1);9-17
  53. Murata H, Mcabe JE,Jepson NJ, Hamada T. The determination of working time and gelation time of temporary soft lining materials. Dent Mater 1997;13(3);186-91
  54. S.Parker, M.Braden. Effect of composition on the gelation of tissue conditioners. Biomat. 1996;17(18);1827-32
  55. Iwanaga H, Murakami S, Murata H, Shigeto N, Hamada T. Factor influencing gelation time of tissue conditioner. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22(3);225-32