DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Serviceability design of a cold-formed steel portal frame having semi-rigid joints

  • Lim, J.B.P. (The Steel Construction Institute) ;
  • Nethercot, D.A. (Imperial College)
  • Received : 2003.07.24
  • Accepted : 2003.12.10
  • Published : 2003.12.25

Abstract

Details are given of a cold-formed steel portal framing system that uses simple bolted moment-connections for both the eaves and apex joints. However, such joints function as semi-rigid and, as a result, the design of the proposed system will be dominated by serviceability requirements. While serviceability is a mandatory design requirement, actual deflection limits for portal frames are not prescribed in many of the national standards. In this paper, a review of the design constraints that have an effect on deflection limits is discussed, and rational values appropriate for use with cold-formed steel portal frames are recommended. Adopting these deflection limits, it is shown through a design example how a cold-formed steel portal frame having semi-rigid eaves and apex joints can be a feasible alternative to rigid-jointed frames in appropriate circumstances.

Keywords

References

  1. ANSYS, Inc. (1998), User's Manual for Revision 5.5, Pittsburgh, ANSYS, Inc.
  2. Baigent, A.H. and Hancock, G.J. (1982), "The behaviour of portal frames composed of cold-formed members", Thin-walled structures - Recent technical advances and trends in design, research and construction, Oxford, Elsevier Applied Science, 209.
  3. BS5950: Part 1 (2000), Code of practice for design in simple and continuous construction: hot rolled sections, London, British Standards Institution.
  4. BS5950: Part 5 (1998), Code of practice for design of cold-formed sections, London, British Standards Institution.
  5. Chung, K.F. and Ip, K.H. (2000), "Finite element modeling of bolted connections between cold-formed steel strips and hot-rolled steel plates under static shear loading", Engng. Struct, 22, 1271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(99)00082-6
  6. CP3 (1972), Code of basic data for the design of buildings: Chapter V: Part 2: Wind loads, London, British Standards Institution.
  7. De Vos, G.P. and Van Rensburg, B.W.J. (1997), "Lightweight cold-formed portal frames for developing countries", Bldg Env., 32(5), 417. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(97)00011-5
  8. Eurocode 3 (1996), Design of steel structures: Part 1 - General rules and rules for buildings, Brussels, Committee European de Normalisation.
  9. Kirk, P. (1986), "Design of a cold-formed section portal frame building system", Proc. 8th International Speciality Conference on Cold-formed Steel Structures, St. Louis, University of Missouri-Rolla, 295.
  10. Lim, J.B.P. (2001), "Joint effects in cold-formed steel portal frames", University of Nottingham, PhD thesis.
  11. Masika, R.J. and Dunai, L. (1995), "Behaviour of bolted end-plate portal frame joints", J. Constr. Steel Res., 32, 207. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-974X(95)93173-2
  12. Morris, L.J. and Plum, D.R. (1988), Structural Steelwork Design to BS5950, London, Longman Scientific and Technical.
  13. SCI Advisory Desk (1991), "Deflection limits for pitched roof portal frames", Steel Construction Today, 203.
  14. Woolcock, S.T. and Kitipornchai, S. (1986), "Portal frame deflections", J. Aust. Inst. Steel Const., 20(3).

Cited by

  1. Optimum Joint Detail for a General Cold-Formed Steel Portal Frame vol.15, pp.9, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.15.9.1623
  2. Research on cold-formed steel connections: A state-of-the-art review vol.20, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.20.1.021
  3. Optimum design of cold-formed steel portal frame buildings including joint effects and secondary members vol.17, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-017-6005-9
  4. Comparison of optimal designs of steel portal frames including topological asymmetry considering rolled, fabricated and tapered sections vol.111, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.12.028
  5. Optimal design of long-span steel portal frames using fabricated beams vol.104, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.10.010
  6. Effect of stressed skin action on the behaviour of cold-formed steel portal frames vol.105, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.09.026
  7. Effect of serviceability limits on optimal design of steel portal frames vol.86, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.03.001
  8. Testing, simulation and design of back-to-back built-up cold-formed steel unequal angle sections under axial compression vol.33, pp.4, 2003, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2019.33.4.595