Applied Microscopy

  • 제33권4호
  • /
  • Pages.261-266
  • /
  • 2003
  • /
  • 2287-5123(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-4445(eISSN)
한국현미경학회 (Korean Society of Microscopy)
권호 표지

다공성막이 혈액뇌관문 내피세포의 배양에 끼치는 영향

Effect of Porous Membrane on Culture Properties of Blood-Brain Barrier Endothelial Cell

  • 이금정 (중앙대학교 의과대학 해부학교실) ;
  • 조혜진 (중앙대학교 의과대학 해부학교실) ;
  • 최형택 (중앙대학교 의과대학 해부학교실) ;
  • 나오순 (중앙대학교 의과대학 해부학교실) ;
  • 김경용 (중앙대학교 의과대학 해부학교실)
  • Lee, Keum-Jeong (Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Cho, Hye-Jin (Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Choi, Hyung-Taek (Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Na, O-Soon (Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Kim, Kyung-Yong (Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University)
  • 발행 : 2003.12.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

소 뇌 미세혈관에서 분리한 내피세포(BBMECs)를 직경 $3.0{\mu}m$및 $0.4{\mu}m$인 구멍을 가지는 다공성막(Transwell)에서 일차배양하였을 때의 특징을 전자현미경을 사용하여 살펴보았다. 분리된 모세혈관의 작은 조각과 분리된 내피세포들은 콜라겐으로 도포한 배양기구의 표면에 고착되어 성장하였다. BBMECs들은 직경 $0.4{\mu}m$인 다공성막의 위쪽 구획에서만 성장하였으나 직경 $3.0{\mu}m$인 구멍을 가진 막에서는 세포들이 구멍을 통해 막의 반대쪽으로 이주하여 다공성막의 아래쪽 구획에서도 성장하여 세포단층을 형성하였다. 이상의 결과로 효소 처리에 의해 분리한 BBMECs는 직경 $0.3{\mu}m$의 다공성막을 통과하나 직경 $0.4{\mu}m$의 다공성막을 통과할 수 없음을 알 수 있었으며, 약물이동도를 관찰하는 실험이나 전기저항을 측정을 목적으로 하는 실험에서는 $3.0{\mu}m$의 다공성막을 사용하는 대신 $0.4{\mu}m$ 크기의 다공성막을 사용해야 한다는 것을 알 수 있었다.

The growth patterns of primary culture of bovine brain microvessel endothelial cells (BBMECs) were studied using electron microscopy when grown on $3.0{\mu}m$ and $0.4{\mu}m$ pore Transwell. The capillary fragments and isolated endothelial cells grew on collagen coated culture plate and Transwell membrane. The BBMECs grew only on the upper surface of membrane of $0.4{\mu}m$. But BBMECs on $3.0{\mu}m$ pore membrane migrated through the pore and grew on the opposite side of the membrane. In summary, BBMECs isolated by enzyme digestion could migrate through $3.0{\mu}m$ pore membrane but not through $0.4{\mu}m$ pore membrane. So $0.4{\mu}m$ pore membrane instead of $3{\mu}m$ pore membrane should be used for drug transport experiment or transendothelial electrical resistance measurement.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abbott NJ, Hughes CC, Revest PA, Greenwood J: Development and characterization of a rat brain capillary endothelial culture: towards an in vitro blood brain barrier. J Cell Sci 103 : 23 37, 1992
  2. Abbruscato TJ, Davis TP: Combination ofhypoxiaJaglycemia compromises in vitro blood brain barrier integrity. J Pathol Exp Ther 289: 668 675, 1999
  3. Arthur FE, Shivers RR, Bowman PD: Astrocyte mediated induction of tight jumctions in brain capillary endothelium: an efficient in vitro model. Dev Brain Res 36 : 155 159, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-3806(87)90075-7
  4. Audus KL, Borchardt RT: Bovine brain microvessel endothelial cell monolayers as a model system for blood brain barrier. Ann NY Acad Sci 507: 9 18,1987 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1987.tb45787.x
  5. Audus KL, Bartel RL, Hidalgo IJ, Borchardt RT: The use of cultured epithelial and endothelial cells for drug transport and metabolic studies, Pharm Res 7: 435 451,1990 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015800312910
  6. Bowman PD, Betz AL, Ar D, Wolinsky JS, Penney JB, Shivers RR, Goldstein GW: Primary culture of capillary endothelium from rat brain, In Vitro 17: 353 362,1981 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02618147
  7. Bowman PD, Ennis SR, Rarey KE, Betz AL, Goldstein GW: Brain microvessel endothelial cells in tissue culture: a model for study of blood brain barrier permeability, Ann Neurol 14: 396 402, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410140403
  8. De Bault LE, Kahn LE, Frommes SP, Cancilla PA: Cerebral microvessels and derived cells in tissue culture: isolation and preliminary characterization, In Vitro 15 : 473 487, 1979 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02618149
  9. Demeuse PH, Kerhofs A, Struys Ponsar C, Knoop B, Remade C, Aguilar PH: Compartmentalised co culture of rat brain endothe lial cells and astrocyte: a synergistic mo del to study the blood brain barrier, J Neurosci Methods 121 21 31,2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0270(02)00225-X
  10. Eddy EP, Maleef BE, Hart TK, Smith PL: In vitro models to predict blood brain barrier penneability, Adv Drug Del Rev 23 : 185 198,1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(96)00435-8
  11. Grabb PA, Gilbert MR: Neoplastic and pharmacological influence on the penneability ofan in vitro blood brain barrier, J Neurosurg 82: 1053 1058,1995 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1995.82.6.1053
  12. Greenwood J: Astrocytes, cerebral endthelium and cell culture: the persuit of an in vitro blood brain barrier organ, Ann NY Acad Sci 633: 426 430,1991 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1991.tb15632.x
  13. Joo F: Endothelial cell of brain and other organ system: some similarities and differences, Progr Neurobiol 48 S35 S37,1993
  14. Male OK, Pryce G, Rahman J: Comparison of the immuno-logical properties of rat cerebral and aortic endothelium, J neuroimmunol 30 : 290 295,1990
  15. Panula P, Joo F, Rechardt L: Evidence for the presence of viable endothelial cells in culture derived from dissociated rat brain, Experimentia 34: 95 97,1978 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01921925
  16. Reese TS, Karnovsky MJ: Fine structural localization of a blood brain barrier to exogenous peroxidase, J Cell BioI 34: 207 217,1967 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.34.1.207
  17. Shi F, Audus KL: Biochemical characteristics of primary and passaged cultures of primate brain microvessel endothelial cells, Neurochem Res 19 :427 433, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00967320
  18. Szabo CA, Deli MA, Ngo Thi Khue, Joo F: Production of pure primary rat endothelial cell culture; a comparison of different method, Neurobiol 5: 1 16,1997 https://doi.org/10.1002/neu.480050102
  19. Williams SK, Gillis JF, Matthews MA, Wagner RC, Bitensky MW: Isolation and characterization of brain endothelial cells: Morphology and enzyme activity, J Neurochem 35: 374 381,1980 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1980.tb06274.x