A Critical Interpretation of Aesthetical Approach to Nursing

간호의 미학적 접근에 대한 비판적 해석

  • 공병혜 (조선대학교 의과대학 간호학과)
  • Published : 2003.10.01

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to interpretate Caper's view of the aesthetical approach to nursing, to discover problems of her arguments, and to ultimately expand the horizon of the aesthetical thinking of nursing. Method: By means of the critical interpretation of Caper's paper, problems of her arguments were discovered. This then was suggested was the proper way of the aesthetical approach to nursing. Result: Caper's arguments of aesthetics were seen to be confused, regarding the pattern of the nursing art and the relationship between aesthetical knowing and practical art, and to have no the nursing's perspective as moral art. The proper paradigm for the distinct thinking of the nursing aesthetics could be offered here through applying some aesthetical theories as follows; a mode of aesthetical knowing could be characterized as emphatical awareness in relationship between nurse and client, and a practical art of nursing understood as moral art in sense of the expression of the human dignity. Conclusion: This study suggested fundamental theme for the proper aesthetical approach to nursing in view of the aesthetical knowing and the practical art. The horizon of the aesthetical thinking in nursing can be expended through the inquiry into aesthetical theories which offer theoretical the base for nursing as an art.

Keywords

References

  1. Baumgarten, A. G. (1983). Theoretische Asthetik. Die Grundlegende Abschnitte aus der 'Aesthetica' (1750/1758). Hamberg: Philosophische Bibliothek
  2. Blondeau, D. (2002). Nursing art as practical art: the necessary relationship between nursing ethics, Nurs philosophy, 3(3), 259-259
  3. Carper, B. L. (1978). Fundamental pattern of Knowing in nursing. Adv Nurs Sci, 1(1), 13-18
  4. Chin, P. L., Kramer, M. K. (1995). Theory and Nursing. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book
  5. Collingwood, R. G. (1958). The principles of art. Oxford University Press, Oxford
  6. Curtin, L. (1982). The commitment of nursing, Nurs Ethics: Theories and Pragmatics (eds L.H. Curtin &M.J.Flaherty), 97-102. Robert J Bundy, Bowie, Maryland
  7. De Raeve, L. (1998). The art of nursing: an aesthetic? Nurs Ethics, 5(5), 401-411
  8. Dewey. J. (1958). Art as Experience, Pedigree, New York: Capricorn book
  9. Edwards, S. D. (1998). The art of nursing. Nurs Ethics, 5(5), 393-400
  10. Edwards, S. D. (2001). Philoaophy of nursing, London: Palgrave
  11. Johnson, J. (1991). Nursing sicence: basic, applied, or practical? Implication for the art of nursing. Adv Nurs Sci, 14(1), 7-16
  12. Johnson, J. (1994). A dialectical examination of nursing art. Adv Nurs Sci, 17(1), 1-14
  13. Kant, I. (1994). Kritik der Urteilskraft. In Weischedel.W.(hrs.), Werkausgabe I. Kant(V). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp
  14. Kim, H. R., & Kim, H. S. (1997). Art and thought. Seoul: Ewha Women University
  15. Kong, B. H. (1999). Aesthetical Knowing and Nursing Action as an Art in Nursing Science. J of Korean Acad Society of Nurs Education, 5(2), 153-164
  16. Kong, B. H. (1999). Kant. Kritik der Urteilskraft, Ulsan: UUP
  17. Kong, B. H. (2002). Aesthetical-ethcal paradigm of care ethics in nursing. J Korean Acad Nurs 32(3), 364-372
  18. Langer, S. (1957). Problem of art, New York: Charles Scribner
  19. Nortvedt, P. (1998). Sensitive judgement, an inquiry into the foundations of nursing ethics, Nursing Ethics, 5(5), 385-392
  20. Orem, D. E. (1971). Nursing: Concepts of Practice. New York: McGraw-Hill book Co
  21. Tostoy, L. (1994). What is art? London: Bristol Classical Press
  22. Wainwright, P. (2000). Towards an aesthetics of nursing. J Adv Nurs, 32(3), 750-756
  23. Watson, J. (1988). Nursing: Human Science and Human Care. New York: National League for Nursing
  24. Weitz M. (1956). The role of theory in aesthetics. J Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 25, 27-35
  25. Wiedenbach, E. (1964). Clinical Nursing: A Helping Art. New York: Springer Publishing Co