The Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of Social Marketing Campaigns in Nutrition

  • Keenan, Debra-Palmer (Department of Nutritional Science, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Cook College) ;
  • Patricia M. Heacock (Department of Nutritional Science, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Cook College)
  • Published : 2003.12.01

Abstract

Over the past two decades in the United States, social marketing has become an increasingly popular means of delivering nutrition education for the purpose of eliciting a specific behavior change. This manuscript defines social marketing via traditional marketing concepts and jargon, as well as through a communications strategy that can be used to guide message and campaign development. Research and evaluation strategies necessary to support the development and assessment of campaign promotions, is discussed. Four campaigns implemented in the United States, and one campaign implemented in Indonesia, are discussed in terms of the strategies presented. These campaigns illustrate how this educational technique and an array of assessment approaches have been applied to varied nutritional issues across diverse target audiences and settings. Practical recommendations, as well as discussion of issues regarding the advantages and disadvantages of using social marketing as an educational strategy, campaign sustainability, and philosophical considerations regarding the use of this educational approach, are addressed.

Keywords

References

  1. Alcalay R, Bell RA (2000) : Promoting nutrition and physical activity through social marketing : Current practices and recommendations, pp.2-53, Center for Advanced Studies in Nutrition and Social Marketing, University of California, Davis
  2. Balch GI, Loughrey K, Weinberg L, Lurie D, Eisner E (1997) : Probing consumer benefits and barriers for the national 5 a day campaign: focus group findings. J Nutr Edu 29 : 178-183 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3182(97)70195-X
  3. Braus P (1995) : Selling good behavior. Am Demogr 17(11) : 60-64
  4. Carroll A, Craypo L, Samuels S (2000) : Evaluating nutrition and physical activity social marketing campaigns: A review of the literature for use in community campaigns, pp.6-31, Center for Advanced Studies in Nutrition and Social Marketing, University of California, Davis
  5. de Pee S, Bloem MW, Satoto, Yip R, Sukaton A, Tjiong R, Shrimpton R, Muhilal, Kodyat B (1998) : Impact of a social marketing campaign promoting dark-green leafy vegetables and eggs in Central Java, Indonesia. Internat J Vitan Nutr Res 68 : 389-398
  6. Foerster SB, Kizer KW, DiSogra LK, Bal DG, Krieg BF,Bunch KL (1995) : California's '5 a day-s-for betterhealth!' campaign: an innovative population-based effort to effect large-scale dietary change. Am J Prey Med 11 (2) : 124-131 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(18)30488-4
  7. GreenCOM (2003) : Strategic participatory communications. Fact Sheet : Social Marketing. Available at : www.greencom.org. Accessed October 3
  8. Gregory E, Ritter E (2003) : Access and accountability: social marketing in extension, a training workbook. Available at : www.tamu.edu/market/training/access.html. Accessed October 3
  9. Heede FA, Pelican S (1995) : Reflections on marketing as an inappropriate model for nutrition education. J Nutr Edu 27(3) : 141-145 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3182(12)80807-7
  10. Heimendinger J, Van Duyn MAS (1995) : Dietary behavior change: the challenge of recasting the role of fruit and vegetables in the American diet. Am J Clin Nutr 61 (suppl) : 1397S-1401S https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/61.6.1397S
  11. Kotler P, Zaltman G (1971) : An approach to planned social change. J Marketing 35 : 3-12
  12. Lefebvre RC, Lurie D, Goodman LS, Weinberg L, Loughrey K (1995) : Social marketing and nutrition education: inappropriate or misunderstood? J Nutr Edu 27 (3) : 146-150 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3182(12)80809-0
  13. Loughrey KA, Balch GI, Lefebvre RC, Doner L, Johnston C, Eisner E, Hadley L (1997) : Bringing 5 a day consumers into focus: qualitative use of consumer research to guide strategic decision making. J Nutr Edu 29 : 172-177 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3182(97)70194-8
  14. National Cancer Institute 5 a Day For Better Health Program Evaluation Report (2003) : Executive Summary. Available at dccps. nci.nih.gov/5ad_exec.html. Accessed November 10
  15. National Cancer Institute's 5 a Day for Better Health Program Website (2003) : Available at www.5aday.gov/index-about. shtml.Accessed October 3
  16. Patterson BH, Block G(1988) : Food choices and the cancer guide-lines. Am J Pub Heal 78 : 282-286 https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.78.3.282
  17. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations (1962) : New York: The Free Press
  18. Rudd RE, Goldberg J, Dietz W (1999) : A five-stage model for sustaining a community campaign. J Heal Comm 4 (1) : 37-48 https://doi.org/10.1080/108107399127084
  19. Sutton SM, Balch GI, Lefebvre (1995) : Strategic questions for consumer-based health communications. Pub Heal Rep 110 : 725-733
  20. Heede FA, Pelican S (1995) : Reflections on marketing as an inappropriate model for nutrition education. J Nutr Educ 27 (3) : 141-145 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3182(12)80807-7
  21. Walsh DC, Rudd RE, Moeykens BA, Moloney TW (1993) : Social marketing for public health. Health Aff(Millwood) Summer 12(2) : 104-119
  22. Wright AL, Naylor A, Wester R, Bauer M, Sutcliffe E (1997) : Using cultural knowledge in health promotion: breastfeeding among the Navajo. Heal Edu Behav 24 (5) : 625-639 https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819702400509