Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management (품질경영학회지)

Korean Society for Quality Management (한국품질경영학회)
권호 표지

A preference­based design metric in dynamic robust design

설계자 선호도를 고려한 동적 시스템의 강건설계법

  • 김경모 (금오공과대학교 신소재시스템공학부(산업시스템전공))
  • Published : 2003.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Dynamic robust design has been regarded as the most powerful design methodology for improving product quality, Dynamic SN ratio adopted in dynamic robust design combines two major quality attributes, the variability around the linear function and the slope of the linear function, into a single design metric. The principal shortcoming associated with the dynamic SN ratio is that the metric is independent of designer's preferences for the quality attributes due to priori sets of attribute tradeoff values inherent in it. Therefore, a more rigorous preference­based design metric to accurately capture designer's intent and preference is needed. A new design metric that can be used in dynamic robust design is proposed. The effectiveness of the proposed design metric is examined with the aid of a demonstrative case study and the results are discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. 강맹규(1990),「불확실성하의 의사결정론」, 1판, 희중당
  2. 한국공업 표준협 회 (1991), 「개발설계단계의 품질공학」 품질공학강좌 1권, 한국공업 표준협 회
  3. Chang, T. S., Ward, A. C. and Lee,J.(1994), "Conceptual Robustness inSimultaneous Eneineerine: AnExtension of Taguchi's Parameter Design", Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 6, pp. 211-222 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01608400
  4. Genichi T., Subir, C. and ShinT.(2000), Robust Engineering,McGraw -Hill, New York
  5. Gold, S. and Krishnamurty, S.(1997),"Trade-offs in Robust Engineering Design", ASME Design EngineeringTechnical Conference, Paper No.DAC-3757
  6. lyer, H. V. and Knshnamurty,S.(1998), "A Preference-Based RobustDesign Metric", Proc. of ASMEDesign Engineering TechnicalConferences, Paper No. DAC-5625
  7. Keeney, R. L. and Raiffa, H.(1993),Decisions with Multiple Objectives :Preferences and Value TradeoffsWiley & Sons, New York
  8. Otto, K .N. and Antonsson, E.K.(1993), "Extensions to the TaguchiMethod of Product Design," ASMEJ. Mechanical Design, Vol. 115, pp.5-13 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2919325
  9. Phadke, M. S.(1989), "QualityEngineering using Robust Design",Prentice-Hall, New Jersey
  10. Thurston, D. L.(1991), "A FormalMethod for Subjective DesignEvaluation with Multiple Attributes"Research in Engineering Design,Vol. 3, pp. 105-122 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581343
  11. Thurston, D. L., Carnahan, J. V., andLiu, T.(1994), "Optimization of Design Utility", ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 116,pp.801-808 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2919453