품질경영학회지 (Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management)

  • 제31권4호
  • /
  • Pages.203-218
  • /
  • 2003
  • /
  • 1229-1889(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-9005(eISSN)
한국품질경영학회 (Korean Society for Quality Management)
권호 표지

The Effect of Multiple Value Frames of IT Productivity on Business Performance

  • Kang, Taeg-Yong (Dept. of Management Information System, Jinju International University) ;
  • Kwon, Do-Wan (John Molson School of Business, Concordia University) ;
  • Son, Eun-Il (Dept. of Management Information System, Jinju International University)
  • 발행 : 2003.12.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The ongoing debate over IT productivity has revealed paradoxical effects of IT. This study proposes that IT business value is paradoxical structured. IT impacts are not easy to generalize according to one perspective or paradigm. This study assumes multiplicity in the phenomenon of IT value and explores effects of these multiple interpretations. The study seeks to understand organizational performance. Hypotheses are developed to test the relationship between competing interpretations of IT value and organizational performance. The purpose of this study is to determine whether or not senior managers perceive IT value on the basis of divergent managerial value frames.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bakos, J. Yannis, "A strategicanalysis of electronic marketplaces,"MIS Quarterly, 15, 3 (1991), 295-310 https://doi.org/10.2307/249641
  2. Barney, Jay, "Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage,"journal of Management, 17, 1 (1991),99-120 https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  3. Benjamin, Robert I., de Long, DavidW. and Morton, Michael S. Scott,"Electronic Data Interchange: HowMuch Competitive Advantage?," Long Range Planning , 23, 1 (1990), 29-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(90)90005-O
  4. Brynjolfsson, Erik, "The Contributionof Information Technology to Consumer Welfare," Information Systems Research, 7, 3 (1996),281-300 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.3.281
  5. Brynjolfsson, Erik and Hitt, Lorin,"Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systemsspending," Management Science, 42, 4(1996), 541-558 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.4.541
  6. Cameron, Kim S. and Quinn, Rovert E., "Organizational paradox and transformation," In R. E. Quinn and K. S. Cameron (Ed.), Paradox and Transformation, Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, Mass, 1988
  7. Coombs, Rod and Hull, Richard,"'Knowledge management practices'and path-dependency in innovation,"Research PoIicy , 27, 3 (1998),237-253
  8. Copeland, Duncan G. and McKenney,James L., "Airline ReservationsSystems: Lessons from History,"MIS QuarterIy, 12, 3 (1988), 353-370 https://doi.org/10.2307/249202
  9. Covin, J.G. and Slevin, D.P., "Strategicmanagemet of small firms in hostileand benign environments," Strategic Management journal, 10, (1989),75-87 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100107
  10. Daft, Richard L. and Steers, RichardM., Organizations: a micro/macroapproach, Scott, Foresman andCompany, Glenview, Illinois, 1986
  11. Dos Santos, Brian L. and Peffers,Ken., "Firm level performanceeffects: A framework for informationtechnology evaluation research," InR. D. Banker, J. A. Kauffman andM. A. Mahmood (Ed.), StrategicInformation Management: Perspectives onOrganizational Growth and Competitive Advantage, Idea GroupPublishing, Harrisburg, PA, 1993,515-546
  12. Drucker, Peter Ferdinand, Theeffective business, the effectiveexecutive, British Institute of Management, London, 1964
  13. Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. and Westcott, Bhan J., "Paradoxicaldemands and the creation of excellence: the case of just-in-timemanufacturing," In R. E. Quinn and K. S. Cameron (Ed.), Paradox and Transformation, Ballinger PublishingCompany, Cambridge, Mass, 1988
  14. El Sawy, Omar A. , Malhotra,Arvind, Gosain, Sanjay and Young,Kerry M., "IT-intensive valueinnovation in the electronic economy:Insights from Marshall Industries,"MIS Quarterfy, 23, 3 (1999),305-335 https://doi.org/10.2307/249466
  15. Garud, Raghu and Ahlstrom, David,"Technology assessment: Asocio-cognitive perspective," journalof Engineering and TechnologyManagement, 14, 1 (1997), 25-48 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-4748(97)00005-2
  16. Griesinger, Donald W. and Livingston, J. W., "Toward a modelof interpersonal motivation inexperimental games," Behavioral Science, 18, 3 (1973), 173-188 https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830180305
  17. Hair, Joseph F., Jr., Anderson, Rolph E., Tatham, Ronald L. and Black,William C., MuItivariate Data Analysis, Prentice Hall, Upper SaddleRiver, NJ, 1998
  18. Hamilton, S. and Chervany, N.L.,"Evaluating Information Systems Effectiveness - Part I: ComparingEvaluation Approaches," MISQuarterIy, Sep., (1981), 55-69
  19. Hitt, Lorin M. and Brynjolfsson, Erik,"Productivity, business profitability,and consumer surplus: Threedifferent measures of informationtechnology value," MIS Quarterly,20, 2 (1996), 121-142 https://doi.org/10.2307/249475
  20. Hopper, Max D., "Rattling SABRE -New Ways to Compete onInformation," Harvard Business Review, 68, 3 (1990), 118-125
  21. Kim, W Chan and Mauborgne,Renee, "Strategy, value innovation,and the knowledge economy," Sloan Management Review , 40, 3 (1999),41-54
  22. Kwon, Dowan, Watts-Sussman,Stephanie and Collopy, Fred, "ValueFrame, Paradox and Change: TheConstructive Nature of InformationTechnology Business Value,"Sprouts: Working Papers onInformation Environments, Systemsand Organizations, 2, Fall (2002),http://weatherhead.cwru.edu/sprouts/2002/020411.pdf
  23. Landauer, T.K., The Trouble with Computers: Usefulness, usability,and productivity, MIT Press,Cambridge, MA, 1995
  24. Leonard-Barton, Dorothy, "CoreCapabilities and Core Rigidities: AParadox in Managing NewProduct Development," Strategic Management JournaI , 13, (1992),111-125 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250131009
  25. Liebrand, W. B. G. and van Run, G.J., "The effects of social motives onbehavior in social dilemmas in twocultures," JournaI of experimentalsocial psychology, 21, 1 (1985),86-102
  26. Loveman, G., "An assessment of theproductivity impact of informationtechnologies," In T. Allen and M.Scott Morton (Ed.), InformationTechnology and the Corporation of the 1990s: Research Studies, OxfordUniversity Press, New York, 1994,84-110
  27. March, J.G., "Exploration and Exploitation in OrganizationalLeaming," Organization Science, 2, 1Mata, Francisco J., Fuerst, WilliamL. and Bamey, Jay B., "Informationtechnology and sustained competitiveadvantage: A resource-basedanalysis," MIS QuarterIy, 19, 4(1995), 487-505 https://doi.org/10.2307/249630
  28. Mata, Francisco J., Fuerst, Willian L. and Barney, Jey B., "Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis." MIS Quarterly, 19, 4(1995), 487-505 https://doi.org/10.2307/249630
  29. Messick, David M. and McClintock, C.G., "Motivational bases of choice in experimental games," Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4 1 (1968), 1-25 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(68)90046-2
  30. Moore, J.F., The Death of Competition, HarperBusiness, New York, 1996
  31. Nault, Barrie R., "Added value and pricing with information technology" MIS Quarterly, 19, 4 (1995), 449-464 https://doi.org/10.2307/249628
  32. Powell, Thomas C and Dent-Micallef,Anne, "Information technology ascompetitive advantage: The role ofhuman, business, and technologyresources," Strategic Managementjournal, 18, 5 (1997), 375-405 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199705)18:5<375::AID-SMJ876>3.0.CO;2-7
  33. Reingold, Jennifer and Stepanek,Marcia, "Why the productivityrevolution will spread.," BusinessWeek, (Feb. 14 2000), 112-118
  34. Roach, S.S., "Services under siege: the restructuring imperative," Harvard Business Heview, 69, 5 (1991), 82-91
  35. Robey, Daniel and Boudreau,Marie-Claude, "Accounting for thecontradictory organizationalconsequences of informationtechnology: theoretical directions andmethodological implications,"Information Systems Research, 10, 2(1999), 167-185 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.10.2.167
  36. Sethi, Vijay and King, William R., "Development of Measures to Assess the Extent to Which an Information Technology Application Provides Competitive Advantage," Management Science, 40, 12 (December) (1994) 1601-1627 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.40.12.1601
  37. Singh, JagdiP, "Redundancy inConstructs: Problem, Assessment,and an Illustrative Example," journalof Business Research, 22, (1991),255-280 https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(91)90006-J
  38. Singh, Jagdip and Rhoads, Gary K.,"Boundary Role Ambiguity inMarketing-Oriented Positions: Amultidimensional, multifacetedoperationalization," JMR, JournaI of Marketing Research, 28, 3 (1991),328-338 https://doi.org/10.2307/3172868
  39. Slevin, Dennis P. and Covin, JeffreyG., "Strategy formation atterns,performance, and the significance ofcontext," Journal of Management, 23,2 (1997), 189-209 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(97)90043-X
  40. Strassmann, P. A., The businessvalue of computers, The Information conomics Press, New Canaan, 1990
  41. Teece, David J., Pisano, Gary and Shuen, Amy, "Dynamic Capabilitiesand Strategic Management,"Strategic Management journal, 18, 7(1997), 509-533 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
  42. Walsh, James P., "Managerial andorganizational cognition: Notes froma thp down memory lane,"Organization Science, 6, 3 (1995),280-321 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.3.280
  43. Zahra, Shaker A and Covin, JeffreyG, "Business strategy, technologypolicy and firm performance,"Strategic Management journal , 14,6 (1993), 451-478 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140605