A Study on the Cyber Museum Organization System for Intangible Cultural Properties II Focused on the Information system and classification code anger - Focusing on the Exhibition Space, Exhibition Method and Expression Specialty -

무형문화재를 위한 사이버뮤지엄 구성체계에 관한 연구 II - 전시방법 및 표현특성을 중심으로 -

  • Published : 2003.10.01

Abstract

The findings of this study indicate that intangible cultural properties are worth preservation and transmission and should be considered as very important as tangible cultural properties. If the studies of intangible cultural properties are continued focusing on their characteristics and formational system, they can be expressed more properly by adding new interactive elements to database and expressive requisites. New techniques introduced in this study are believed to provide people with most reasonable and developmental motives for expression of the existing intangible cultural properties. Concerning Korea's cultural properties centered on intangible cultural properties, information construction should be made with a new idea of information based on database from the previous studies. The result will be able to set an important factor to give wide publicity to our cultural identity, which is currently shown in the process of background communication, and serve as a foothold to deliver exact information to our descendants. The intangible cultural properties are our people's mental cultural heritage resources. If museums or initiator groups, which are organized to spread cultural heritages, can use them as the subjects of exhibition through information construction and visualization, it will function to maximize the educational effect of transmitting our national mental world. The development of digital environment will provide the optimum conditions and tools making it possible to visualize intangible forms and ideas in a virtual cyber space. Given these viewpoints, steady studies and efforts for the improvement of Korea's cultural image should be made in the way of intangible cultural properties as well as tangible ones. They start from the country's accurate appreciation of cultural properties and are embodied in systematic adjustment and relationship between interdependent elements.

Keywords

References

  1. 김홍기, 건축 조형 디자인론, 기문당, 2002
  2. 김경균 외, Information Architecture, 디자인 정글, 2001
  3. 나재오, 한국 전통문화 요소의 시각적 상징화에 관한 연구, 산업자원부, 1998.8
  4. 송진희, 한국 문화 이미지의 세계화 연구(무형문화재의 시각화를 중심으로), 산업자원부, 2002.5
  5. 클레멘트목, 디지털시대의 정보디자인, 안그라픽스, 2000
  6. 한국관광공사, 한국 문화유산 관광상품화 방안, 한국관광공사, 1996.12
  7. 구세연, 사이버 뮤지엄의 구성과 구조에 관한 고찰, 홍익대학교, 2001
  8. 송정화, 사이버 전시관의 Information Architecture와 그 구성에 관한 연구, 홍익대학교, 2001
  9. 이은종, Web Usability : The art of e-biz Intelligenc, 삼성 멀티캠퍼스 세미나, 2000
  10. 이용학, 무형문화재 전승, 보존 활성화 방안에 관한 연구, 연세대학교, 1999.7
  11. 문화재관리국, 무형문화재의 전승, 보급제도의 발전방향, 문화재관리국, 1998.12
  12. 한국디자인진흥원, 한국디자인 특성화연구를 통한 디자인산업 특화전략, 산업자원부, 2002
  13. Archer, L.B. 1984. Systematic Method for Designers, in Cross, N. ed. 1984. Developments in Design Methodology, Chichester : John Wiley & Sons. 57-82,(Originally published by The Design Council, London 1965.)
  14. Braa, K. 1995. Beyond Formal Quality in Information Systems Design. PhD Dissertation. University of Oslo
  15. Cross, N. 1984. Developments in Design Methodology. Chichester : John Wiley & Sons
  16. Cross, N and Cross, A.C. 1996. Winning by design: the methods of Gordon Murry. racing care designer. Design Studies. 17, 91-107
  17. Darke, J. 1979. The primary generator and the design process. Design Studies. I(1). 36-44
  18. Gray, C. and Pirie, I. 1995. 'Artistic' research procedure: Research at the edge of chaos?' Design Interfaces Conference Proceedings Vol. 3, Design Theory Design Education. 11-13 April 1995. The European Academy of Design . Salford : University of Salford
  19. Hinnells, M. 1993. Environmental factors in products: how to gather the evidence? Design Studies. 14(4) : 457-475
  20. ughes, J. and Wood-Happer, T. 1999. Systems development as a research act. Journal of Information Technology. 14 : 83-94
  21. Jones, C.J. 1997. PhD Research in Design. DRS_NEWS. 58. July-September. 4-6
  22. Jones, C.J. 1992. Design Methods. 2nd edit. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.(Originally published by the Council of Industrial Design, London, UK)
  23. Patton, M.Q. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd edit. Newbury Park, CA : Sage
  24. Svengren, L. 1993. Case study methods in design management research. Design Studies. 14(4): 444-456
  25. Stenmark, D. 2000. Collaborative aspects of information retrieval tools : Summarising three action case studies. in 26. Svensson, L., et al. Proceedings of IRIS 23. Laboratorium for Interaction Technology. University of Trollhattan Uddevalla
  26. 구겐하임 미술관 스페인의 빌바오 뮤지엄 (http://www.guggenheim-bilbao.es/ingles/home.htm)
  27. 미호미술관 (http://www.miho.or.jp/English/index.htm)
  28. 오르세미술관 (http://www.smartweb.fr/orgay/)
  29. 유피지미술관 (http://www.uffiziJirenze.it/welcomeE.html)
  30. 루브르 박물관 (http://www.smartweb.fr/louvre/index.html)
  31. 러시아미술관 (http://www.museum.ru)
  32. 러시아사이버미술관(http://www.computer-museum.ru)
  33. 다윈미술관 (http://darwin.museum.ru)
  34. 센츄럴박물관 (http://museum.navy.ru)