Health Policy and Management (보건행정학회지)

Korean Academy of Health Policy and Management (한국보건행정학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Development of a Quality Assessment Tool for the Process of Health Promotion Programs at Public Health Centers

보건소 건강증진사업 수행과정의 질 평가지표 개발 -고혈압관리사업에서의 타당도 검증-

  • 서영준 (연세대학교 보건행정학과) ;
  • 정애숙 (연세대학교 보건행정학과) ;
  • 박태선 (연세대학교 보건행정학과) ;
  • 이규식 (연세대학교 보건행정학과)
  • Published : 2003.09.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study purports to develop a quality assessment tool for the process of health promotion programs at public health centers(PHC). The draft of the assessment tool developed by the literature was distributed to 242 staffs who were in charge of the health promotion programs at PHCs for evaluating the feasibility of the tool on September and October 2002. The major results of the study were as follows; The quality assessment tool developed in the study consisted of four domains: strategic planning, program management, monitoring and evaluation, and resources and information. The strategic planning dealt with the function of the planning staff and committees, community data analysis, the feasibility of the program, and the approach methods for attaining the goal of the program. The program management included the items on the qualification and power of the program staff. The monitoring and evaluation included the items on the reporting and communication among program units, and feed back after monitoring. Finally, the resources and information dealt with community networking, clients' response, and consulting activity of the staff. The validity of the tools was tested and partly supported by both formative and criterion-related methods. The assessment tools developed in this study could be used by health promotion workers in the self-evaluation of the program quality. In conclusion, the quality assessment tool developed in the study will be a good safeguard for assuring the quality of the process of health promotion programs.

Keywords

References

  1. 변종화, 문상식, 이주열, 남정자, 한영자, 문옥륜 등. 국민건강증진기금사업의 운영 및 평가체계 개발. 서울 : 보건복지부;1999.
  2. 보건복지부. 2001 국민건강증진사업 편람. 서울;복건복지부:2001.
  3. 보건복지부. 건강증진거점보건소기술지원평가단 사업보고서. 서울 : 보건복지부;2001.
  4. 실버만. 환자의 관점에서 본 질 향상, 의료의 질 경영 따라잡기, Graham N. O. (ed.). 김춘배 외 4인(옮김). 서울:계축문화사;2001.
  5. Baum F. Measuring effectiveness in community-based Health promotion: Quality, evidence and effectiveness in health promotion Edited by John Kenneth Davies and Gorden Macdonald, London and New York;1998. pp.68-89.
  6. Davis JK, Gordon M. Quality, evidence and effectiveness in health promotion. London and New york Routledge; 1998. pp68-109.
  7. Donabedian A. Exploration in quality assessment and monitoring vol 1: The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment. Ann Arbor, Michigan: ealth Administration Press;1980. pp. 24-26, pp.101-109.
  8. Haglund BJA, Petterson B., Finder D, Tillgren P. The SundsvalI Handbook, 'We Can Do It' From the third international conference on health promotion, Sundsvall, Sweden, Sundbyberg: Karolinska Institutet, Department of Public Science, Division of Social Medicine; 1993. pp.9-15.
  9. Mcdonald G. Presentation of existing standards for evaluation and quality assessment of health promotion intervention in the 15 EU member states. Final Report; Woerden, Netherlands: International Union for Health Promotion Education and Netherlands Institute for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention; 1996.
  10. Petterson B. Ett dussin kvalitestskomponenter i halsofrfunjande arbete. Working paper. Stockholm: Karolinska Institute, Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Social Medicine-Master Course in Health Promotion(in swedish); 1992.
  11. Speller V, Evans D, Heak MJ, Developing quality assurance standards for healthpromotion practice in UK. Health Promotion International 1997;12(3):215-224. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/12.3.215
  12. Ovretveit J, Quality in health promotion. Health Promotion International 1996;1:5-62.
  13. Vuori H. Patient satisfaction - an attribute or indicator of the quality of care? editorial. Quality Review Bulletin 1987;13(3):106-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0097-5990(16)30116-6

Cited by

  1. Development of the evaluation tool for the food safety and nutrition management education projects targeting the middle class elderly: Application of the balanced score card and the structure-process-outcome concept vol.48, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2015.48.6.542