- A case study & suggestion for Lecture Evaluation System of University -

강의평가제에 관한 사례연구 -학생대상 설문조사에 근거한 교수 강의평가제 중심으로-

  • Published : 2003.06.01

Abstract

Lecture Evaluation system is an only way, so far, to evaluate the quality of lectures in our university and yet has several problems. This system does not have any effects on professors; however, it is rather used to threaten assistant professors and/or part-time/full-time lecturers. As a result, students are still dissatisfied with the unchanging lectures of professors. Generally speaking, We should consider new ideas to introduce a head teacher system or improve the lecture evaluation system to open doors wider for teachers, professors do their best to expand students' understanding by practicing the Lecture Evaluation System. In fact, it is hard to keep the objectiveness that the professors estimate the quality of professors. That is why this check list should be restricted only as a guideline among the system. After all, it is expected to bring better educational circumstances when the system functions properly to provide professors to research more.

Keywords

References

  1. 원효헌, 설현수(2000). '학생에 의한 교사 교수활동 평가도구의 양호도 분석'. 교육평가연구. 제 13 권 2 호, p55-77
  2. 장언효(1993). '교수강의평가제도의 문제점과 개선방안' '교육논충', 13(4), pp91-103
  3. 최연욱(1995). '대학 강의평가를 위한 문항개발'. 이화여자대학교
  4. 표시열(1993). '현대사회와 대학의 기능(상)', '대학교육'. 제 64호, pp74-78
  5. 허 형(1999). '학생에 의한 교수 강의평가척도 개발과 시행방안', '한국교육문제 연구소 논문집'. 제 14호 . pp23-45
  6. Abrami, P.C., Perry, R. P., and Leventhal, L.,(1982) 'The Relationship Between Student Personality Characteristics, Teacher Ratings, and Student Achivement', 'Joumal of Educational Psychology' Vol. 74
  7. Braskamp, L. A., and Ory, J. C.,(1994), 'Assessing Faculty Work: Enhancin Individual and Institutional Performance, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass'
  8. Dunkin.M.J.(1986), 'Research on Teaching in Higher education, In M.C. Wittrock(ed), Handbook of Research in Teaching(3rd ed)', NewYork: Macmillan, 754-777
  9. Feldman, K. A.(1998). 'Effective collage teaching from the student's and faculty's view: Matched and mismatched priorities'. Research in Higher Education, 30, pp.583-645
  10. Fraenkel, J.R., & Wallen. N.E, (1990). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill, Inc.
  11. Norland, E. (1993). Agricultural education 888. Printed and bound by: Grade A Notes, Inc.