A Survey on Suit Design by Image Visual Effect Demographic Characteristics

인구통계적 변인에 따른 수트디자인 시각효과에 관한 연구

  • 박순천 (조선대학교 미술대학 디자인학부)
  • Published : 2003.09.01

Abstract

This treatise deals with the profitable suit image design of middle-aged men by examining visual effects in physical design. The sample of this study is people who lives in Kwangju, the Republic of Korea and 20-50 age's men and women. And it is very variety in each population statistics factors the differences of associate design visual effect which considering the difference of sex and age group, numbers of button, a figure and material pattern. Firstly, look into the associate design visual effect by sex and button number. In men's group, the style with three buttons was the most attractive and that with two buttons was the least attractive. In 50's group, the style with two buttons was the least attractive and those with 1.3 and 4 buttons were a little attractive. Secondly, in the difference of associate design with sex and shape, men's group was considered that standard type was the most attractive shape, women's group was thought that lean and standard types were the most attractive shape. So we can know that the attractive shape is different with sex. In the difference of association design with age and shape, 20's considered that standard type was the most modernistic and fat type was the least modernistic. 30's considered that lean type was the most modernistic and 50's thought that fat type and standard type were the most modernistic. Thirdly, see the sex and material pattern. In familarity, men's group considered that stripe pattern was more familiar than checks and plain patterns. And they considered that striped pattern and plain was more manly than checks. In sex and material pattern, 20's thought that plain was the most attractive, stripe was the next, and checks was not attractive. 40's estimated that plain and stripe were more attractive than checks. 50's judged that stripe was the most attractive material. Thus. the attraction is different with ages and material patterns.

Keywords

References

  1. Bell, E. L. (1991). Adult's perception of male garment styles. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 10(1), pp. 8-12 https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X9101000102
  2. 김문숙 (1998). 패션디자인의 실제. 서울: 경춘사. p.284
  3. Texjournal (1999). 11. pp. 124-128
  4. 김진식 (1990). 한국양복 100년사. 서울: 미리내. p. 85
  5. 박기완 (1992). 복식용어사전. 서울: 유신문화사. p. 210
  6. 복장월보 (1985). 재킷의 여러 가지 뒷모습. 11, p. 50
  7. Horn, M. J. & Gurel, L. M. (1981). The Second Skin : An Interdisciplinary Study f Clothing, 3rd ed. Boston : Houghton Mifflin Co.. pp. 112, 194-195, 295-296
  8. 채금석 (1996). 현대 남성 수트 (suit)의 변천과 미학적 특성. 복식 30호, pp. 239-259
  9. 권혜욱, 변유선 (1997). 우리나라 남성복 광고의 변화와 남성복 정장 자켓의 디자인 요소 변화에 관한 연구. 한국복식학회, 제 33호, pp. 117-129
  10. 유송옥. 권혜욱 1996). 한국 현대 남성복 번전에 관한 연구. 성균관대학교 인문과학 연구소. p. 276
  11. 월간섬유 (1990). 남성복 120년....그 모든 것. 6, pp. 185-199
  12. Tranquillo, M. D. (1984). Styles of Fashion-A Pictorial Handbook. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Inc.. p. 17
  13. Picken. M. B. (1973). The Fashion Dictionary. New York: Funk and Wagnalls. p. 203
  14. 오미겐타로. 권민 역 (1991). 조형심리. 서울: 동국출판사, p. 88
  15. http://mydreamwiz.com (주)드림위즈
  16. 이미정, 이인자 (1999). 복식디자인 요소가 얼굴지각에 미치는 영향. 복식 44, pp. 103-116
  17. 김유진 (2000). 의복디자인의 조형적 특성에 따른 감성연구. 한국의류학회지, 24(7), pp. 976-986
  18. Kretchmer, E. (1936). Physique and character, Routledge and Kegan paul. ltd.. London. pp. 178-182
  19. 김재숙 (1991). 의복범주, 유행성 및 착용자 연령의 인상효과에 대한 연구. 연세대학교 대학원 박사학위논문. pp. 135-136